Justifying the Epistemological Theory of Argumentation

IF 0.9 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Informal Logic Pub Date : 2024-01-21 DOI:10.22329/il.v43i4.8473

C. Lumer

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses Harvey Siegel’s general justification of the epistemological theory of argumentation in his seminal essay “Arguing with Arguments." On the one hand, the achievements of this essay are honoured—in particular, a thorough differentiation of the different meanings of ‘argument’ and ‘argumentation,’ the semantic justification of the fundamentality of arguments as sequences of propositions, and the detailed critiques of alternative theories of argumentation. On the other hand, suggestions for strengthening the theory are added to Siegel's expositions, which make different perspectives within the epistemological theory of argumentation recognisable.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

论证认识论理论的正当性

本文讨论了哈维-西格尔在其开创性论文《用论据论证》中对论证认识论理论的总体论证。一方面，本文表彰了这篇文章的成就--尤其是对 "论据 "和 "论证 "不同含义的彻底区分、论据作为命题序列的基本性在语义学上的论证，以及对其他论证理论的详细批判。另一方面，在西格尔的论述中加入了加强该理论的建议，这使得论证认识论理论中的不同视角得以识别。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Informal Logic PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： Informal Logic publishes articles that advance the dialectic in reasoning and argumentation theory and practice. Primary criteria for the acceptance of articles with a theoretical focus or interest are: (1) the article advances the dialectic or constitutes an interesting comment on it: it presents a cogent argument, objection, interpretation or position that is an advance in relation to the background of issues and controversies on the topic; or it casts the issue addressed in a new and worthwhile light; and (2) the article makes explicit reference to the pertinent literature on its topic, and it discharges the burden of proof imposed by that scholarship. Primary criteria for acceptance of articles devoted to the teaching of informal logic, critical thinking or argumentation include: originality; utility; timeliness; and evidence of the effectiveness of the methods, materials, technologies, etc., proposed. The standard criteria for scholarly publication—topical fit with the subjects covered in the journal; adequacy of coverage to the issue addressed; clarity, organization and literateness of the prose; conceptual clarity and cogency of argumentation—apply ceteris paribus to the selection of all articles, notes and reviews.

期刊最新文献

The Distinctiveness Problem of Analogical Arguments Generative AI and Argument Creativity Arguments from Fairness and Extensive Interpretation in Greek Judicial Rhetoric What Makes an Argument Strong? Une réaction à la critique depuis les marges épistémologiques