Sorumluluk Bilincinin Faydacı Tüketim Tarzına Etkisinde Rasyonel Harcamanın Aracılık Rolü

IF 0.3 Q4 ECONOMICS Sosyoekonomi Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2024.01.08
Gamze Ergi̇n, Kahraman Çati, Ebru Oskaloğlu
{"title":"Sorumluluk Bilincinin Faydacı Tüketim Tarzına Etkisinde Rasyonel Harcamanın Aracılık Rolü","authors":"Gamze Ergi̇n, Kahraman Çati, Ebru Oskaloğlu","doi":"10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2024.01.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the scope of this research, it was revealed whether rational spending (with and without credit cards) has a mediating role in the effect of responsibility consciousness on utilitarian consumption style. In addition, it was determined whether the level of responsibility consciousness affects utilitarian consumption style and rational spending and whether rational spending affects utilitarian consumption. Research data were collected using the questionnaire technique. Data were collected from 479 students, 129 academics and 71 administrative staff. The collected data were analysed using SPSS 26 and PROCESS v4.2 plugin. In the research, first of all, the dimensions of responsibility consciousness, utilitarian consumption style and rational spending scales were determined with the help of explanatory factor analysis. As a consequence of the factor analysis, responsibility awareness and utilitarian consumption are one dimension; the rational spending scale was determined to have two dimensions: rational spending habit without credit cards and rational use of credit cards. As a consequence of the intermediation analysis, it was concluded that the consciousness of responsibility affects rational spending without credit cards, rational use of credit cards and utilitarian consumption. In addition, it was supposed that rational spending without credit cards and rational use of credit cards affect utilitarian consumption, and rational spending without credit cards affects rational use of credit cards. The serial mediation analysis using Model 6 determined that the consciousness of responsibility affects utilitarian consumption serially (one after the other) through rational spending (rational use of credit cards and rational spending habits without credit cards).","PeriodicalId":42679,"journal":{"name":"Sosyoekonomi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sosyoekonomi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2024.01.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within the scope of this research, it was revealed whether rational spending (with and without credit cards) has a mediating role in the effect of responsibility consciousness on utilitarian consumption style. In addition, it was determined whether the level of responsibility consciousness affects utilitarian consumption style and rational spending and whether rational spending affects utilitarian consumption. Research data were collected using the questionnaire technique. Data were collected from 479 students, 129 academics and 71 administrative staff. The collected data were analysed using SPSS 26 and PROCESS v4.2 plugin. In the research, first of all, the dimensions of responsibility consciousness, utilitarian consumption style and rational spending scales were determined with the help of explanatory factor analysis. As a consequence of the factor analysis, responsibility awareness and utilitarian consumption are one dimension; the rational spending scale was determined to have two dimensions: rational spending habit without credit cards and rational use of credit cards. As a consequence of the intermediation analysis, it was concluded that the consciousness of responsibility affects rational spending without credit cards, rational use of credit cards and utilitarian consumption. In addition, it was supposed that rational spending without credit cards and rational use of credit cards affect utilitarian consumption, and rational spending without credit cards affects rational use of credit cards. The serial mediation analysis using Model 6 determined that the consciousness of responsibility affects utilitarian consumption serially (one after the other) through rational spending (rational use of credit cards and rational spending habits without credit cards).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理性支出在责任意识对功利主义消费方式影响中的中介作用
在这一研究范围内,揭示了理性消费(使用信用卡和不使用信用卡)在责任意识对功利主义消费方式的影响中是否起着中介作用。此外,研究还确定了责任意识水平是否影响功利性消费方式和理性消费,以及理性消费是否影响功利性消费。研究数据采用问卷调查法收集。数据收集对象包括 479 名学生、129 名学者和 71 名行政人员。收集到的数据使用 SPSS 26 和 PROCESS v4.2 插件进行分析。在研究中,首先借助解释性因子分析确定了责任意识、功利性消费方式和理性消费的量表维度。经过因子分析,责任意识和功利性消费为一个维度;理性消费量表被确定为两个维度:无信用卡理性消费习惯和合理使用信用卡。通过中介分析,得出了责任意识影响无卡理性消费、合理使用信用卡和功利性消费的结论。此外,无信用卡的理性消费和合理使用信用卡会影响功利性消费,无信用卡的理性消费会影响合理使用信用卡。利用模型 6 进行的序列中介分析表明,责任意识通过理性消费(理性使用信用卡和不使用信用卡的理性消费习惯)对功利性消费产生序列(一前一后)影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sosyoekonomi
Sosyoekonomi ECONOMICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Soviet Union's Five-Year Plans on Türkiye's First Five-Year Industrial Plan within the Context of Turkish-Russian Economic Relations Ekonomik Risk, Ekonomik Özgürlük İndeksi, Yolsuzluk Algısı İndeksi ve İnsani Gelişim İndeksi’nin Mekânsal Analizi The Effect of Real Wages on Employment after the Global Financial Crisis: The Case of the Turkish Manufacturing Industry Examining The Impact of Inflation on Financial Development in The Fragile Five Economies with Asymmetric Cointegration Tests Developing Countries’ Deadlock: What Does the Thirlwall's Law Offer Us?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1