Subjective Socioeconomic Status Moderates How Resting Heart Rate Variability Predicts Pain Response

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Affective science Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1007/s42761-023-00234-w
Jacinth J. X. Tan, Chin Hong Tan, Michael W. Kraus
{"title":"Subjective Socioeconomic Status Moderates How Resting Heart Rate Variability Predicts Pain Response","authors":"Jacinth J. X. Tan,&nbsp;Chin Hong Tan,&nbsp;Michael W. Kraus","doi":"10.1007/s42761-023-00234-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Higher resting heart rate variability (HRV)—an index of more flexible response to environmental stressors, including noxious stimuli—has been linked to reduced perception of experimentally induced pain. However, as stress responses are adapted to one’s chronic environments, we propose that chronic exposure to threats captured by one’s subjective socioeconomic status (SSS) may shape different adaptations that produce distinct pain responses linked to higher resting HRV. Specifically, lower SSS individuals with more threat exposures may prioritize threat detection by upregulating sensitivity to stressors, such as acute pain. Therefore, higher HRV would predict greater perceived acute pain among lower SSS individuals. In contrast, higher SSS individuals with less threat exposures may instead prioritize affective regulation by downregulating sensitivity to stressors, producing lower pain perception with higher HRV. We examined this stress response moderation by SSS in 164 healthy young adults exposed to experimental pain via the cold pressor test (CPT). Resting HRV, indexed by the <i>root-mean-square of successive differences</i> in heart rate, and self-reported SSS were measured at rest. Pain perception indexed by self-reported pain and pain tolerance indexed by hand-immersion time during the CPT were assessed. Results revealed that among higher SSS individuals, higher resting HRV predicted lower pain reports and subsequently greater pain tolerance during the CPT. Conversely, among lower SSS individuals, higher resting HRV predicted higher pain reports and subsequently lower pain tolerance. These findings provide preliminary evidence that environmental stress exposures linked to one’s SSS may shape unique biological adaptations that predict distinct pain responses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72119,"journal":{"name":"Affective science","volume":"5 2","pages":"1 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42761-023-00234-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affective science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-023-00234-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Higher resting heart rate variability (HRV)—an index of more flexible response to environmental stressors, including noxious stimuli—has been linked to reduced perception of experimentally induced pain. However, as stress responses are adapted to one’s chronic environments, we propose that chronic exposure to threats captured by one’s subjective socioeconomic status (SSS) may shape different adaptations that produce distinct pain responses linked to higher resting HRV. Specifically, lower SSS individuals with more threat exposures may prioritize threat detection by upregulating sensitivity to stressors, such as acute pain. Therefore, higher HRV would predict greater perceived acute pain among lower SSS individuals. In contrast, higher SSS individuals with less threat exposures may instead prioritize affective regulation by downregulating sensitivity to stressors, producing lower pain perception with higher HRV. We examined this stress response moderation by SSS in 164 healthy young adults exposed to experimental pain via the cold pressor test (CPT). Resting HRV, indexed by the root-mean-square of successive differences in heart rate, and self-reported SSS were measured at rest. Pain perception indexed by self-reported pain and pain tolerance indexed by hand-immersion time during the CPT were assessed. Results revealed that among higher SSS individuals, higher resting HRV predicted lower pain reports and subsequently greater pain tolerance during the CPT. Conversely, among lower SSS individuals, higher resting HRV predicted higher pain reports and subsequently lower pain tolerance. These findings provide preliminary evidence that environmental stress exposures linked to one’s SSS may shape unique biological adaptations that predict distinct pain responses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主观社会经济地位如何调节静息心率变异性对疼痛反应的预测
较高的静息心率变异性(HRV)是对环境压力(包括有害刺激)做出更灵活反应的指标,它与对实验诱导疼痛的感知降低有关。然而,由于应激反应是根据个人的长期环境而调整的,我们建议,长期暴露于个人主观社会经济地位(SSS)所反映的威胁中可能会形成不同的适应性,从而产生与较高静息心率变异有关的不同疼痛反应。具体来说,社会经济地位较低的人受到的威胁较多,他们可能会通过提高对压力源(如急性疼痛)的敏感性来优先检测威胁。因此,较高的心率变异将预示着较低 SSS 的人感知到的急性疼痛会更大。与此相反,SSS 值较高且受到威胁较少的人可能会通过降低对压力源的敏感性来优先调节情绪,从而在心率变异较高的情况下产生较低的疼痛感。我们通过冷加压试验(CPT),在 164 名暴露于实验性疼痛的健康年轻人中研究了 SSS 对压力反应的调节作用。我们测量了静息时的心率变异(以连续心率差的均方根为指标)和自我报告的 SSS。评估了以自我报告的疼痛为指标的疼痛感和以 CPT 期间手浸入时间为指标的疼痛耐受性。结果显示,在 SSS 较高的人中,静息心率变异较高的人疼痛报告较低,因此在 CPT 期间疼痛耐受性较高。相反,在 SSS 值较低的人中,静息心率变异越大,疼痛报告越高,疼痛耐受性也越低。这些发现提供了初步证据,表明与个人SSS相关的环境压力暴露可能会形成独特的生物适应性,从而预测不同的疼痛反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction to the Special Section Commentaries Affectivism and the Emotional Elephant: How a Componential Approach Can Reconcile Opposing Theories to Serve the Future of Affective Sciences A Developmental Psychobiologist’s Commentary on the Future of Affective Science Emotional Overshadowing: Pleasant and Unpleasant Cues Overshadow Neutral Cues in Human Associative Learning Emphasizing the Social in Social Emotion Regulation: A Call for Integration and Expansion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1