Decolonizing Human Rights Law in Global Health - the Impacts of Intellectual Property Law on Access to Essential Medicines: A Perspective from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Khorsed Zaman
{"title":"Decolonizing Human Rights Law in Global Health - the Impacts of Intellectual Property Law on Access to Essential Medicines: A Perspective from the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Khorsed Zaman","doi":"10.1017/s2044251323000747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The global impacts of COVID-19 have been calamitous, unleashing widespread human suffering and exacerbating health crises, all while worsening pre-existing inequalities and transgressing fundamental human rights. Despite earnest pleas from the United Nations and developing nations for an equitable distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, these appeals were largely unheeded. Instead, major pharmaceutical manufacturers and high-income countries (HICs) had maintained a stranglehold on vaccine technology through the safeguarding of intellectual property rights (IPRs), leading to exorbitant pricing and preferential distribution to affluent regions. This vaccine hoarding has left low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with delayed and insufficient supplies, endangering the lives of the most vulnerable. The stringent enforcement of IPRs mechanisms, rather than aligning with international human rights obligations, has further marginalised the right to life, health, and access to vaccines and medicines, particularly in LMICs. This study ardently advocates for a policy shift that promotes the decolonisation of human rights in the context of IPRs and global health law.","PeriodicalId":43342,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s2044251323000747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global impacts of COVID-19 have been calamitous, unleashing widespread human suffering and exacerbating health crises, all while worsening pre-existing inequalities and transgressing fundamental human rights. Despite earnest pleas from the United Nations and developing nations for an equitable distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, these appeals were largely unheeded. Instead, major pharmaceutical manufacturers and high-income countries (HICs) had maintained a stranglehold on vaccine technology through the safeguarding of intellectual property rights (IPRs), leading to exorbitant pricing and preferential distribution to affluent regions. This vaccine hoarding has left low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with delayed and insufficient supplies, endangering the lives of the most vulnerable. The stringent enforcement of IPRs mechanisms, rather than aligning with international human rights obligations, has further marginalised the right to life, health, and access to vaccines and medicines, particularly in LMICs. This study ardently advocates for a policy shift that promotes the decolonisation of human rights in the context of IPRs and global health law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球卫生领域人权法的非殖民化--知识产权法对获取基本药物的影响:从 COVID-19 大流行的角度看问题
COVID-19 的全球影响是灾难性的,它造成了广泛的人类苦难,加剧了健康危机,同时还加剧了原有的不平等现象,侵犯了基本人权。尽管联合国和发展中国家恳切呼吁公平分配 COVID-19 疫苗,但这些呼吁在很大程度上被置若罔闻。相反,主要制药商和高收入国家通过保护知识产权(IPRs)扼制了疫苗技术,导致疫苗定价过高并优先分配给富裕地区。这种疫苗囤积现象导致中低收入国家(LMICs)的疫苗供应出现延误和不足,危及最弱势群体的生命。知识产权机制的严格执行非但没有与国际人权义务保持一致,反而使生命权、健康权以及获得疫苗和药品的权利进一步边缘化,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家。本研究积极倡导政策转变,在知识产权和全球卫生法的背景下促进人权的非殖民化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
C.H. Alexandrowicz's India and the Kautilyan Moment Annotated Leading Trademark Cases in Major Asian Jurisdictions edited by Kung-Chung LIU. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2020. xii + 456 pp. Hardcover: £150.00; Softcover: £38.99; VitalSource eBook: £38.99 doi: 10.4324/9780429316395 In Fairness to Nottebohm: Nationality in an Age of Globalization Collective Self-Defence in International Law by James A. GREEN. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2024. xx + 366 pp. Hardback: USD$135.00. doi: 10.1017/9781009406420 Feminist Jurisography Law, History, Writing by Ann GENOVESE. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2023. ix+142 pp. Hardcover: £120.00/AUD$252.00; Softcover: £34.99/AUD$73.99; eBook: £31.49/AUD$66.99. doi: 10.4324/9780429461132
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1