Six Years Later: Examining the Academic and Employment Outcomes of the Original and Reinstated Summer Pell

IF 1.7 3区 教育学 Q2 ECONOMICS Education Finance and Policy Pub Date : 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1162/edfp_a_00423
Vivian Yuen Ting Liu, Rachel Yang Zhou, Jordan Matsudaira
{"title":"Six Years Later: Examining the Academic and Employment Outcomes of the Original and Reinstated Summer Pell","authors":"Vivian Yuen Ting Liu, Rachel Yang Zhou, Jordan Matsudaira","doi":"10.1162/edfp_a_00423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Pell Grant, while offering substantial financial support for low-income students pursuing higher education, historically covered only the costs of two full-time semesters per year and did not include assistance for summer courses. Research has consistently demonstrated that continuous enrollment throughout the academic year enhances college persistence and degree completion. In response to this understanding, the Summer Pell (SP) program was introduced in the summer of 2009, providing eligible low-income students with an additional grant to cover summer tuition and related expenses. However, after a brief period of operation, the SP program was discontinued in 2011, only to be reinstated in 2017. We utilize administrative data obtained from New York City in the context of differences-in-differences analyses spanning both program periods, and find that SP-eligible students exhibited a higher retention rate in the fall of their second year, achieved higher rates of associate's and bachelor's degree attainment, and experienced greater earnings gains up to nine years after college entry compared to SP-ineligible students. Our analysis of heterogeneity further underscores that the benefits of the SP program were pronounced among black students and older students.","PeriodicalId":46870,"journal":{"name":"Education Finance and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Finance and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00423","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Pell Grant, while offering substantial financial support for low-income students pursuing higher education, historically covered only the costs of two full-time semesters per year and did not include assistance for summer courses. Research has consistently demonstrated that continuous enrollment throughout the academic year enhances college persistence and degree completion. In response to this understanding, the Summer Pell (SP) program was introduced in the summer of 2009, providing eligible low-income students with an additional grant to cover summer tuition and related expenses. However, after a brief period of operation, the SP program was discontinued in 2011, only to be reinstated in 2017. We utilize administrative data obtained from New York City in the context of differences-in-differences analyses spanning both program periods, and find that SP-eligible students exhibited a higher retention rate in the fall of their second year, achieved higher rates of associate's and bachelor's degree attainment, and experienced greater earnings gains up to nine years after college entry compared to SP-ineligible students. Our analysis of heterogeneity further underscores that the benefits of the SP program were pronounced among black students and older students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
六年之后:研究最初和恢复的夏季佩尔计划的学业和就业成果
佩尔助学金虽然为接受高等教育的低收入学生提供了大量资助,但历来只涵盖每年两个全日制学期的费用,不包括对暑期课程的补助。研究一致表明,全学年持续注册可提高大学的持续学习率和学位的完成率。根据这一认识,2009 年夏季推出了暑期佩尔(SP)计划,为符合条件的低收入学生提供额外的助学金,用于支付暑期学费和相关费用。然而,在短暂运行一段时间后,SP 计划于 2011 年终止,直到 2017 年才重新恢复。我们利用从纽约市获得的行政数据,对两个计划期间进行了差异分析,结果发现,与符合 SP 计划条件的学生相比,符合 SP 计划条件的学生在第二年秋季的保留率更高,获得副学士学位和学士学位的比率更高,并且在进入大学九年后的收入增长幅度更大。我们对异质性的分析进一步凸显了 SP 计划对黑人学生和高年级学生的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Making the (Letter) Grade: The Incentive Effects of Mandatory Pass/Fail Courses Assessing School District Decision-Making: In-Person Schooling and COVID-19 Transmission Situating Leadership at the Center of Education Finance and Policy The Impact of School Desegregation on White Individuals' Racial Attitudes and Politics in Adulthood The External Validity of College Remediation Effects: Caveats about Compliers in Fuzzy-Discontinuity Designs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1