AN ANALYSIS OF HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILL QUESTIONS IN READING COMPREHENSION IN SCHOOL FINAL EXAMINATION IN BIMA

Novi Sri Rahmi, Nizam Ahsani
{"title":"AN ANALYSIS OF HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILL QUESTIONS IN READING COMPREHENSION IN SCHOOL FINAL EXAMINATION IN BIMA","authors":"Novi Sri Rahmi, Nizam Ahsani","doi":"10.54783/jser.v5i2.233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is aimed at finding out the distribution of higher order thinking skill questions, describing the specific cognitive processes demonstrated under HOTS questions, and finding out the portion of HOTS questions in two school examination packages in Bima. Content analysis was used to examine 86 reading comprehension test items in school final examination using Bloom’s taxonomy revised version. Qualitative data analysis was applied to the reading comprehension question items. Public documentation, indirect observation and a semi-structured interview were performed to collect the data. Data source were collected from reading comprehension test items and analysis card. In analyzing the data, qualitative analysis of Miles, Huberman, & Saldana (2014) model with three phases was applied. The findings indicated the distribution of higher order thinking skill questions are lower than lower order thinking skill questions. HOTS only obtain 6 out of 86 questions while the rest of questions are indicated as LOTS. Analyze skill has the highest distribution among HOTS skills: 4 questions, evaluate skill has 2 questions, while create skill is not found. On the contrary, the most used specific cognitive processes in the whole questions are interpreting and recognizing skill with the frequency of 18 questions, and differentiating and critiquing skills frequently appear in the test as the specific cognitive processes of HOTS questions","PeriodicalId":507825,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Economics Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Economics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54783/jser.v5i2.233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is aimed at finding out the distribution of higher order thinking skill questions, describing the specific cognitive processes demonstrated under HOTS questions, and finding out the portion of HOTS questions in two school examination packages in Bima. Content analysis was used to examine 86 reading comprehension test items in school final examination using Bloom’s taxonomy revised version. Qualitative data analysis was applied to the reading comprehension question items. Public documentation, indirect observation and a semi-structured interview were performed to collect the data. Data source were collected from reading comprehension test items and analysis card. In analyzing the data, qualitative analysis of Miles, Huberman, & Saldana (2014) model with three phases was applied. The findings indicated the distribution of higher order thinking skill questions are lower than lower order thinking skill questions. HOTS only obtain 6 out of 86 questions while the rest of questions are indicated as LOTS. Analyze skill has the highest distribution among HOTS skills: 4 questions, evaluate skill has 2 questions, while create skill is not found. On the contrary, the most used specific cognitive processes in the whole questions are interpreting and recognizing skill with the frequency of 18 questions, and differentiating and critiquing skills frequently appear in the test as the specific cognitive processes of HOTS questions
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对毕马威学校期末考试阅读理解中的高阶思维技能问题的分析
本研究旨在了解高阶思维能力试题的分布情况,描述高阶思维能力试题所展示的具体认知过程,并了解高阶思维能力试题在比马两套学校考试试卷中所占的比例。采用布卢姆分类法修订版对学校期末考试中的 86 个阅读理解测试项目进行了内容分析。对阅读理解试题进行了定性数据分析。收集数据的方法包括公开文献、间接观察和半结构式访谈。数据来源于阅读理解测试题目和分析卡。在分析数据时,采用了 Miles、Huberman 和 Saldana(2014 年)的定性分析模型,分为三个阶段。结果表明,高阶思维技能题的分布低于低阶思维技能题。在86个问题中,HOTS仅占6个,其余问题均为LOTS。在 HOTS 技能中,分析技能的分布最多:4 道题,评价技能有 2 道题,而创建技能则没有。相反,在整个试题中使用最多的特定认知过程是解释和识别技能,使用频率为 18 题,而区分和批判技能作为 HOTS 试题的特定认知过程在测试中频繁出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SAACCESS (SIMPAN ARSIP DENGAN ACCESS) APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT AT 11TH STATE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL SURABAYA PENGARUH DISIPLIN KERJA DAN LINGKUNGAN KERJA NON FISIK TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI MELALUI KEPUASAN KERJA SEBAGAI INTERVENING VARIABEL (STUDI EMPIRIK PADA PEGAWAI SALAH SATU PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR PIPA DI KAB. BOGOR) PENGARUH PEMAHAMAN PERPAJAKAN, SOSIALISASI PERPAJAKAN, DAN MODERNISASI SISTEM PERPAJAKAN TERHADAP KEPATUHAN PAJAK PELAKU USAHA MIKRO, KECIL, DAN MENENGAH (UMKM) DI PROVINSI DKI JAKARTA PENGARUH RETURN ON INVESTMENT (ROI) DAN EARNING PER SHARE (EPS) TERHADAP DIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO (DPR) PT. UNILEVER INDONESIA Tbk (PERIODE 2010-2023) PENGARUH KUALITAS PRODUK, HARGA DAN PROMOSI TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN MOTOR HONDA SCOOPY DI KOTA PALEMBANG
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1