Weaving webs of well-being: The ethics of navigating religious differences in Christian foster families with foster children of various backgrounds

IF 1 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Social Compass Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1177/00377686231219469
Brenda E Bartelink, Diana VAN BERGEN, J. Vanderfaeillie, Paul Vermeer, S. Saharso
{"title":"Weaving webs of well-being: The ethics of navigating religious differences in Christian foster families with foster children of various backgrounds","authors":"Brenda E Bartelink, Diana VAN BERGEN, J. Vanderfaeillie, Paul Vermeer, S. Saharso","doi":"10.1177/00377686231219469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes ethical issues arising in transreligious foster care placements in relation to foster children’s needs regarding religious socialization and identification. Applying Urban Walker’s expressive-collaborative framework to 30 qualitative interviews with foster parents, foster children, parents, and professionals, we elaborate and apply a three-level reflection on Christian foster parents’ ethics of care in everyday practice of foster care. A first-level reflection demonstrates that integrating the foster child in the foster family often leads to predominant Christian socialization of foster children. A second-level reflection demonstrates asymmetry between foster parents and birth parents in the religious socialization of foster children, leading to confusion for the foster child and (potential) conflict with birth parents. Finally, a normative reflection leads us to conclude that foster children in transreligious placements need loose and hybrid moral frames in which they can alter, shift, and navigate their multiple identifications and partialities as part of their development.","PeriodicalId":46442,"journal":{"name":"Social Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Compass","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00377686231219469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes ethical issues arising in transreligious foster care placements in relation to foster children’s needs regarding religious socialization and identification. Applying Urban Walker’s expressive-collaborative framework to 30 qualitative interviews with foster parents, foster children, parents, and professionals, we elaborate and apply a three-level reflection on Christian foster parents’ ethics of care in everyday practice of foster care. A first-level reflection demonstrates that integrating the foster child in the foster family often leads to predominant Christian socialization of foster children. A second-level reflection demonstrates asymmetry between foster parents and birth parents in the religious socialization of foster children, leading to confusion for the foster child and (potential) conflict with birth parents. Finally, a normative reflection leads us to conclude that foster children in transreligious placements need loose and hybrid moral frames in which they can alter, shift, and navigate their multiple identifications and partialities as part of their development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
编织幸福之网基督教寄养家庭与不同背景寄养儿童之间宗教差异的伦理导航
本文分析了跨宗教寄养安置中出现的伦理问题,这些问题与寄养儿童在宗教社会化和身份认同方面的需求有关。通过对寄养父母、寄养儿童、寄养父母和专业人士的 30 个定性访谈,我们运用 Urban Walker 的表达-合作框架,对基督教寄养父母在日常寄养实践中的照顾伦理进行了三个层次的反思。第一层反思表明,将寄养儿童融入寄养家庭往往会导致寄养儿童的基督教社会化占主导地位。第二层反思表明,在寄养儿童的宗教社会化方面,寄养父母与亲生父母之间存在不对称,导致寄养儿童的困惑以及与亲生父母的(潜在)冲突。最后,规范性反思使我们得出结论,跨宗教寄养的寄养儿童需要宽松和混合的道德框架,在这种框架中,他们可以改变、转变和驾驭自己的多重认同和偏执,这也是他们成长的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Compass
Social Compass Multiple-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Social Compass is a fully peer reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on the sociology of religion. It aims to reflect the wide variety of research being carried out by sociologists of religion in all countries. Part of each issue consists of invited articles on a particular theme; for the unthemed part of the journal, articles will be considered on any topic that bears upon religion in contemporary societies. Issue 2 each year contains selected papers from the biennial conferences of the International Society for the Sociology of Religion (ISSR). Readers are also invited to contribute to the Forum section.
期刊最新文献
Toward equality: Including non-human animals in studies of lived religion and nonreligion. Christianity and reverential naturalism engage a world in peril: A dialogue between disciplines. Young people and religious actors in a globalized world. Introduction Exploring the use of the mass media by youths in Pentecostal churches in Nigeria Religious-secular as non-competitive: Encouraging participative church in a Czech Catholic diocese
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1