A New Simple Method for Age Determination of Harbour Porpoises (Phocoena phocoena)

Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI:10.1578/am.50.1.2024.30
Louise B. Henriksen, C. B. Thøstesen, A. Alstrup, Hanne Lyngholm Larsen, Magnus Wahlberg, Ursula Siebert, S. Pagh
{"title":"A New Simple Method for Age Determination of Harbour Porpoises (Phocoena phocoena)","authors":"Louise B. Henriksen, C. B. Thøstesen, A. Alstrup, Hanne Lyngholm Larsen, Magnus Wahlberg, Ursula Siebert, S. Pagh","doi":"10.1578/am.50.1.2024.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Age determination of marine mammals is important for understanding the impact of anthropogenic disturbances as well as for population management. Toothed whales are usually age-determined by counting annually formed layers in their teeth. This includes a time-consuming sequence of preparations, usually involving chemical treatment. This study tested a quicker and simpler method for age determination of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena), originally developed for age determination of foxes and other terrestrial carnivores. The tooth was ground with fine-grained sandpaper, and the age lines were directly read using a binocular microscope. To evaluate the usability of the grinding method for harbour porpoises, three tests were used: (1) the number of growth layer groups (GLGs) in teeth from 66 harbour porpoises by the grinding method were compared by two readers; (2) GLGs in teeth from six harbour porpoises prepared by the grinding method and by the decalcification method were compared in a blinded set-up with two readers; and (3) the GLGs in teeth from two individuals with known ages prepared by both the grinding method and the decalcification method, respectively, were compared. A Bland–Altman plot showed high agreement between the determined age of individuals by the two different methods. The average age difference was -0.56 years, and the 95% confidence interval for the average difference was [-4.3, 3.2] years. The grinding method is therefore considered to be a valid alternative and quicker method for age determination of harbour porpoises.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1578/am.50.1.2024.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Age determination of marine mammals is important for understanding the impact of anthropogenic disturbances as well as for population management. Toothed whales are usually age-determined by counting annually formed layers in their teeth. This includes a time-consuming sequence of preparations, usually involving chemical treatment. This study tested a quicker and simpler method for age determination of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena), originally developed for age determination of foxes and other terrestrial carnivores. The tooth was ground with fine-grained sandpaper, and the age lines were directly read using a binocular microscope. To evaluate the usability of the grinding method for harbour porpoises, three tests were used: (1) the number of growth layer groups (GLGs) in teeth from 66 harbour porpoises by the grinding method were compared by two readers; (2) GLGs in teeth from six harbour porpoises prepared by the grinding method and by the decalcification method were compared in a blinded set-up with two readers; and (3) the GLGs in teeth from two individuals with known ages prepared by both the grinding method and the decalcification method, respectively, were compared. A Bland–Altman plot showed high agreement between the determined age of individuals by the two different methods. The average age difference was -0.56 years, and the 95% confidence interval for the average difference was [-4.3, 3.2] years. The grinding method is therefore considered to be a valid alternative and quicker method for age determination of harbour porpoises.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
港湾鼠海豚年龄测定的新简易方法
海洋哺乳动物的年龄测定对于了解人为干扰的影响和种群管理非常重要。齿鲸的年龄通常是通过计算其牙齿中每年形成的齿层来确定的。这包括一系列耗时的准备工作,通常涉及化学处理。这项研究测试了一种更快速、更简单的方法来测定港湾鼠海豚(Phocoena phocoena)的年龄,这种方法最初是为测定狐狸和其他陆生食肉动物的年龄而开发的。用细砂纸打磨牙齿,然后用双目显微镜直接读取年龄线。为了评估磨牙法对港湾鼠海豚的可用性,我们使用了三种测试方法:(1)由两名读数员比较 66 头港湾江豚的磨牙法牙齿生长层组(GLG)的数量;(2)在盲法设置中,由两名读数员比较 6 头港湾江豚的磨牙法和脱钙法牙齿生长层组的数量;(3)比较两头已知年龄个体的磨牙法和脱钙法牙齿生长层组的数量。布兰德-阿尔特曼图显示,用两种不同方法测定的个体年龄具有很高的一致性。平均年龄差为-0.56岁,平均年龄差的95%置信区间为[-4.3, 3.2]岁。因此,研磨法被认为是测定港湾鼠海豚年龄的一种有效的替代方法,也是一种更快捷的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1