Biopsy or no biopsy? Risk of Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules Based on TI-RADS Criteria

Faadil Shariff, Vivek Halappa
{"title":"Biopsy or no biopsy? Risk of Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules Based on TI-RADS Criteria","authors":"Faadil Shariff, Vivek Halappa","doi":"10.18060/27782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules recommended for biopsy using the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting & Data System (TIRADS). \nMethods: We conducted a retrospective review of ultrasound (US) guided thyroid biopsies performed from 2018- 2023 at IU Health hospitals for nodules which were recommended for biopsy based on ACR TI-RADS criteria and compared with histopathology results. The research was conducted at University and Methodist Hospital radiology reading rooms. \nResults: Of the total 210 thyroid nodules recommended for biopsy, only 8.57% of nodules biopsied were malignant. Positive malignancy rate for TR-3 was 10.2%, TR-4 was 7.1%, and TR-5 was 12.5%. TR-3 nodules less than 2.9 cm were all benign on histopathology. TR-4 nodules less than 1.5 cm were all benign on histopathology. TR-5 nodules were all benign on histopathology. The most common malignancy was papillary thyroid carcinoma. \nConclusion: ACR TI-RADS is currently the standard of care for guidelines and lexicon for radiologists for characterizing thyroid nodules. Our results demonstrate that all TR-3 nodules less than 2.9 cm were all benign and most of the TR-4 and TR-5 nodules biopsied were benign on histopathology. The lower biopsy rate for positive malignancy even for TR-4 and TR-5 nodules respectively raises the need for revision for existing TI-RADS criteria, as more nodules could be followed up with ultrasound rather than percutaneous biopsy, which will alleviate patient anxiety as well as decrease overall healthcare costs.","PeriodicalId":20522,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IMPRS","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IMPRS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/27782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules recommended for biopsy using the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting & Data System (TIRADS). Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of ultrasound (US) guided thyroid biopsies performed from 2018- 2023 at IU Health hospitals for nodules which were recommended for biopsy based on ACR TI-RADS criteria and compared with histopathology results. The research was conducted at University and Methodist Hospital radiology reading rooms. Results: Of the total 210 thyroid nodules recommended for biopsy, only 8.57% of nodules biopsied were malignant. Positive malignancy rate for TR-3 was 10.2%, TR-4 was 7.1%, and TR-5 was 12.5%. TR-3 nodules less than 2.9 cm were all benign on histopathology. TR-4 nodules less than 1.5 cm were all benign on histopathology. TR-5 nodules were all benign on histopathology. The most common malignancy was papillary thyroid carcinoma. Conclusion: ACR TI-RADS is currently the standard of care for guidelines and lexicon for radiologists for characterizing thyroid nodules. Our results demonstrate that all TR-3 nodules less than 2.9 cm were all benign and most of the TR-4 and TR-5 nodules biopsied were benign on histopathology. The lower biopsy rate for positive malignancy even for TR-4 and TR-5 nodules respectively raises the need for revision for existing TI-RADS criteria, as more nodules could be followed up with ultrasound rather than percutaneous biopsy, which will alleviate patient anxiety as well as decrease overall healthcare costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活检还是不活检?基于 TI-RADS 标准的甲状腺结节恶性风险
目的:使用美国放射学会(ACR)甲状腺成像报告和数据系统(TIRADS)评估建议进行活检的甲状腺结节的恶性风险。方法:我们对2018-2023年期间IU Health医院根据ACR TI-RADS标准推荐进行活检的结节进行了超声(US)引导下甲状腺活检的回顾性研究,并与组织病理学结果进行了比较。研究在大学医院和卫理公会医院放射科阅片室进行。研究结果在建议活检的 210 个甲状腺结节中,只有 8.57% 的结节为恶性。TR-3的阳性恶性率为10.2%,TR-4为7.1%,TR-5为12.5%。组织病理学结果显示,小于 2.9 厘米的 TR-3 结节均为良性。小于 1.5 厘米的 TR-4 结节经组织病理学检查均为良性。TR-5结节的组织病理学检查结果均为良性。最常见的恶性肿瘤是甲状腺乳头状癌。结论ACR TI-RADS 是目前放射科医生描述甲状腺结节特征的标准指南和词典。我们的研究结果表明,所有小于 2.9 厘米的 TR-3 结节都是良性的,大多数活检的 TR-4 和 TR-5 结节在组织病理学上都是良性的。即使是TR-4和TR-5结节的活检阳性恶性率也较低,这就提出了修订现有TI-RADS标准的必要性,因为更多的结节可以通过超声而不是经皮活检进行随访,这将减轻患者的焦虑并降低总体医疗成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extracranial Meningioma Metastasis: A Systematic Review of Clinical Characteristics, Management Strategies, and Outcomes Intraventricular Ependymoma in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review of Demographics, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes Intraventricular Ependymoma in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review of Demographics, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes Extracranial Meningioma Metastasis: A Systematic Review of Clinical Characteristics, Management Strategies, and Outcomes Exploring Differentiation and TEAD Inhibition in NF2-Knockdown NES Cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1