Comparative Analysis of the Discrepancy in Conventional Cephalometric Tracing and Digital Cephalometric Tracing with Planmeca Romexis® Software

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences Pub Date : 2024-01-11 DOI:10.15517/ijds.2024.58261
Pamela Chinchilla Torres, María José Rodríguez Pacheco, Ramón Chinchilla Herrera
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the Discrepancy in Conventional Cephalometric Tracing and Digital Cephalometric Tracing with Planmeca Romexis® Software","authors":"Pamela Chinchilla Torres, María José Rodríguez Pacheco, Ramón Chinchilla Herrera","doi":"10.15517/ijds.2024.58261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to compare the discrepancy in conventional cephalometric tracing and digital cephalometric tracing in lateral skull radiographs, with 3 angular and 3 linear measurements. We used 24 digital lateral skull radiographs of patients from the Universidad Latina de Costa Rica, taken with the Kodak 8000C Digital Panoramic and Cephalometric System, for the computerized tracing the radiographs were passed directly to the Planmeca Romexis® software, and the same radiographs were printed for the manual tracing. A comparison between the manual tracing and the Planmeca Romexis® software measurements showed statistically significant differences (p<0,05) of 4 measurements between the two systems. It is evident that the cephalometric tracing with the Planmeca Romexis® software is more reliable than the manual tracing due to the data obtained in this research.","PeriodicalId":19450,"journal":{"name":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2024.58261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the discrepancy in conventional cephalometric tracing and digital cephalometric tracing in lateral skull radiographs, with 3 angular and 3 linear measurements. We used 24 digital lateral skull radiographs of patients from the Universidad Latina de Costa Rica, taken with the Kodak 8000C Digital Panoramic and Cephalometric System, for the computerized tracing the radiographs were passed directly to the Planmeca Romexis® software, and the same radiographs were printed for the manual tracing. A comparison between the manual tracing and the Planmeca Romexis® software measurements showed statistically significant differences (p<0,05) of 4 measurements between the two systems. It is evident that the cephalometric tracing with the Planmeca Romexis® software is more reliable than the manual tracing due to the data obtained in this research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 Planmeca Romexis® 软件进行传统头颅测量描记与数字头颅测量描记的差异比较分析
本研究的目的是比较头颅侧位X光片中传统头颅测量描记与数字头颅测量描记在 3 个角度和 3 个线性测量方面的差异。我们使用柯达 8000C 数字全景和头颅测量系统拍摄的 24 张哥斯达黎加拉美大学患者的数字头颅侧位X光片进行计算机描记,X光片直接传输到 Planmeca Romexis® 软件,并打印出相同的 X 光片用于手动描记。手动描记与 Planmeca Romexis® 软件测量结果的比较显示,两种系统的 4 项测量结果存在显著的统计学差异(P<0.05)。从本研究获得的数据来看,使用 Planmeca Romexis® 软件进行头形测量比手动测量更可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Current Perspective on Fiberglass Posts Length: Finite Element Study Uses of Chitosan-Based Hydrogels in Dentistry: A Systematic Review Sodium Hypochlorite in Endodontic Therapy: Immutable Hero or Imminent Threat? Exploring the Complexities of Temporomandibular Joint Function and Dysfunction: A Contemporary Review Factors Associated with the Perception of Prehospital Internship Training of Dental and Other Health Sciences Students in the COVID-19 Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1