The impact of libraries and informationists on patient and population care: a mixed-methods study

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of the Medical Library Association Pub Date : 2024-01-11 DOI:10.5195/jmla.2024.1520
Carol Shannon, Jacqueline Freeman, Mark MacEachern, Gurpreet Rana, Craig Smith, Judith Smith, Jean Song
{"title":"The impact of libraries and informationists on patient and population care: a mixed-methods study","authors":"Carol Shannon, Jacqueline Freeman, Mark MacEachern, Gurpreet Rana, Craig Smith, Judith Smith, Jean Song","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2024.1520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: While several studies have examined the effectiveness of librarian interactions with clinicians and impact of librarians on patient care, no studies have explored a library’s effects on population care. The goal of this study was to investigate the library’s impact on both patient and population care.\nMethods: Using a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design, we first interviewed a small set of clinicians and researchers active in patient and population care. Based on the themes that we discovered through coding the interviews, we created a survey that was sent to faculty in the health sciences and the health system.\nResults: We collected data from a representative sample of our population. We discovered that all respondents value the library and informationists, using our services most for teaching, publishing, presenting, and professional development.\nConclusion: We now have data to support our value to our population and to show where we can do more work to improve the use of our services. Our study shows the value of doing a mixed-methods sequential exploration in which themes that are important to our user community were identified prior to launching a large-scale survey.","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2024.1520","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: While several studies have examined the effectiveness of librarian interactions with clinicians and impact of librarians on patient care, no studies have explored a library’s effects on population care. The goal of this study was to investigate the library’s impact on both patient and population care. Methods: Using a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design, we first interviewed a small set of clinicians and researchers active in patient and population care. Based on the themes that we discovered through coding the interviews, we created a survey that was sent to faculty in the health sciences and the health system. Results: We collected data from a representative sample of our population. We discovered that all respondents value the library and informationists, using our services most for teaching, publishing, presenting, and professional development. Conclusion: We now have data to support our value to our population and to show where we can do more work to improve the use of our services. Our study shows the value of doing a mixed-methods sequential exploration in which themes that are important to our user community were identified prior to launching a large-scale survey.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图书馆和信息员对病人和人群护理的影响:一项混合方法研究
目的:虽然已有多项研究探讨了图书馆员与临床医生互动的有效性以及图书馆员对患者护理的影响,但还没有研究探讨图书馆对人群护理的影响。本研究的目标是调查图书馆对患者和人群护理的影响:方法:我们采用了一种顺序探索性混合方法设计,首先采访了一小部分活跃在患者和人群护理领域的临床医生和研究人员。根据对访谈进行编码后发现的主题,我们制作了一份调查问卷,并将其发送给健康科学和卫生系统的教师:我们从具有代表性的样本中收集了数据。我们发现,所有受访者都非常重视图书馆和信息人员,他们在教学、出版、演讲和职业发展中使用我们的服务最多:我们现在有数据来支持我们对大众的价值,并显示我们在哪些方面可以做更多的工作来提高我们服务的使用率。我们的研究表明了采用混合方法进行有序探索的价值,即在开展大规模调查之前,确定对我们的用户群体非常重要的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Medical Library Association
Journal of the Medical Library Association INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly that aims to advance the practice and research knowledgebase of health sciences librarianship. The most current impact factor for the JMLA (from the 2007 edition of Journal Citation Reports) is 1.392.
期刊最新文献
A community engagement program to improve awareness for credible online health information. Consulting with an embedded librarian: student perceptions on the value of required research meetings. Designing a framework for curriculum building in systematic review competencies for librarians: a case report. History in context: teaching the history of dentistry with rare materials. MLA Research Training Institute (RTI) 2018 and 2019: participant research confidence and program effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1