Factors Contributing to Potentially Unnecessary Pediatric Emergency Transfers

Kortni Clements, Nancy Glober
{"title":"Factors Contributing to Potentially Unnecessary Pediatric Emergency Transfers","authors":"Kortni Clements, Nancy Glober","doi":"10.18060/27741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Riley Hospital for Children receives thousands of emergency pediatric transfers from outside hospitals every year. The United States is currently facing a national EMS shortage along with increasing costs of medical care. Additionally, these transfers can be inconvenient for patients and their families. However, not all of these transfers are medically necessary. Identifying factors that contribute to unnecessary emergency transfers is essential for optimizing care for each patient. \nMethods: Retrospective chart reviews of electronic medical records at Riley Hospital for Children were completed for transferred patients between 01/01/2022 to 02/20/2022. Patients were identified through the transfer center patient list. The primary objective of the study was to identify patients transferred and discharged from the emergency department without advanced imaging or specialist consult. Demographic data including age, race, ethnicity, and sex were collected. \nResults: There were 404 patients included in the study. About one third of these patients were discharged from the emergency department. Of those, 38 patients (9.4%) also did not have advanced imaging or a specialist consult in the Riley Emergency Department. Age was found tobe statistically different between these patients and all other patients. The median age for patients discharged without advanced imaging or specialist consult was 2.4 years old, while the median age for all other patients was 6.5 years old. Other demographics including race, ethnicity, and sex were not significantly different. \nConclusion and Potential Impact: The results suggest that younger pediatric patients may be at a greater risk for unnecessary emergency transfer. The generalizability of this study is limited in scope due to the use of only one EMR and hospital system. Finally, as this is a retrospective study, the information is limited by what was documented.","PeriodicalId":20522,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IMPRS","volume":" 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IMPRS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/27741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Riley Hospital for Children receives thousands of emergency pediatric transfers from outside hospitals every year. The United States is currently facing a national EMS shortage along with increasing costs of medical care. Additionally, these transfers can be inconvenient for patients and their families. However, not all of these transfers are medically necessary. Identifying factors that contribute to unnecessary emergency transfers is essential for optimizing care for each patient. Methods: Retrospective chart reviews of electronic medical records at Riley Hospital for Children were completed for transferred patients between 01/01/2022 to 02/20/2022. Patients were identified through the transfer center patient list. The primary objective of the study was to identify patients transferred and discharged from the emergency department without advanced imaging or specialist consult. Demographic data including age, race, ethnicity, and sex were collected. Results: There were 404 patients included in the study. About one third of these patients were discharged from the emergency department. Of those, 38 patients (9.4%) also did not have advanced imaging or a specialist consult in the Riley Emergency Department. Age was found tobe statistically different between these patients and all other patients. The median age for patients discharged without advanced imaging or specialist consult was 2.4 years old, while the median age for all other patients was 6.5 years old. Other demographics including race, ethnicity, and sex were not significantly different. Conclusion and Potential Impact: The results suggest that younger pediatric patients may be at a greater risk for unnecessary emergency transfer. The generalizability of this study is limited in scope due to the use of only one EMR and hospital system. Finally, as this is a retrospective study, the information is limited by what was documented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导致潜在不必要儿科急诊转院的因素
背景介绍莱利儿童医院每年都要接收数千名从外部医院转来的儿科急诊病人。美国目前正面临着全国性急救服务短缺以及医疗费用不断上涨的问题。此外,这些转院可能会给病人及其家属带来不便。然而,并非所有这些转院都是医疗必需的。找出导致不必要紧急转院的因素对于优化每位患者的护理至关重要。方法:对莱利儿童医院 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 2 月 20 日期间转院患者的电子病历进行回顾性病历审查。患者通过转院中心患者名单确定。研究的主要目的是确定从急诊科转院并出院的患者中是否有未经高级影像学检查或专家会诊的患者。研究还收集了包括年龄、种族、民族和性别在内的人口统计学数据。研究结果共有 404 名患者参与研究。其中约三分之一的患者从急诊科出院。其中有 38 名患者(9.4%)在莱利急诊科没有进行高级成像或专家会诊。研究发现,这些患者的年龄与所有其他患者存在统计学差异。未接受高级影像学检查或专家会诊的出院患者的年龄中位数为 2.4 岁,而所有其他患者的年龄中位数为 6.5 岁。包括种族、民族和性别在内的其他人口统计学特征没有明显差异。结论和潜在影响:研究结果表明,年龄较小的儿科患者可能面临更大的不必要紧急转院风险。由于只使用了一种电子病历和医院系统,本研究的推广范围有限。最后,由于这是一项回顾性研究,所记录的信息有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extracranial Meningioma Metastasis: A Systematic Review of Clinical Characteristics, Management Strategies, and Outcomes Intraventricular Ependymoma in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review of Demographics, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes Intraventricular Ependymoma in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review of Demographics, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes Extracranial Meningioma Metastasis: A Systematic Review of Clinical Characteristics, Management Strategies, and Outcomes Exploring Differentiation and TEAD Inhibition in NF2-Knockdown NES Cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1