Thomas Debris-Alazard, Pouria Fallahpour, Damien Stehl'e
{"title":"Quantum Oblivious LWE Sampling and Insecurity of Standard Model Lattice-Based SNARKs","authors":"Thomas Debris-Alazard, Pouria Fallahpour, Damien Stehl'e","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2401.03807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Learning With Errors ($\\mathsf{LWE}$) problem asks to find $\\mathbf{s}$ from an input of the form $(\\mathbf{A}, \\mathbf{b} = \\mathbf{A}\\mathbf{s}+\\mathbf{e}) \\in (\\mathbb{Z}/q\\mathbb{Z})^{m \\times n} \\times (\\mathbb{Z}/q\\mathbb{Z})^{m}$, for a vector $\\mathbf{e}$ that has small-magnitude entries. In this work, we do not focus on solving $\\mathsf{LWE}$ but on the task of sampling instances. As these are extremely sparse in their range, it may seem plausible that the only way to proceed is to first create $\\mathbf{s}$ and $\\mathbf{e}$ and then set $\\mathbf{b} = \\mathbf{A}\\mathbf{s}+\\mathbf{e}$. In particular, such an instance sampler knows the solution. This raises the question whether it is possible to obliviously sample $(\\mathbf{A}, \\mathbf{A}\\mathbf{s}+\\mathbf{e})$, namely, without knowing the underlying $\\mathbf{s}$. A variant of the assumption that oblivious $\\mathsf{LWE}$ sampling is hard has been used in a series of works constructing Succinct Non-interactive Arguments of Knowledge (SNARKs) in the standard model. As the assumption is related to $\\mathsf{LWE}$, these SNARKs have been conjectured to be secure in the presence of quantum adversaries. Our main result is a quantum polynomial-time algorithm that samples well-distributed $\\mathsf{LWE}$ instances while provably not knowing the solution, under the assumption that $\\mathsf{LWE}$ is hard. Moreover, the approach works for a vast range of $\\mathsf{LWE}$ parametrizations, including those used in the above-mentioned SNARKs.","PeriodicalId":13158,"journal":{"name":"IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch.","volume":"120 3","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.03807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Learning With Errors ($\mathsf{LWE}$) problem asks to find $\mathbf{s}$ from an input of the form $(\mathbf{A}, \mathbf{b} = \mathbf{A}\mathbf{s}+\mathbf{e}) \in (\mathbb{Z}/q\mathbb{Z})^{m \times n} \times (\mathbb{Z}/q\mathbb{Z})^{m}$, for a vector $\mathbf{e}$ that has small-magnitude entries. In this work, we do not focus on solving $\mathsf{LWE}$ but on the task of sampling instances. As these are extremely sparse in their range, it may seem plausible that the only way to proceed is to first create $\mathbf{s}$ and $\mathbf{e}$ and then set $\mathbf{b} = \mathbf{A}\mathbf{s}+\mathbf{e}$. In particular, such an instance sampler knows the solution. This raises the question whether it is possible to obliviously sample $(\mathbf{A}, \mathbf{A}\mathbf{s}+\mathbf{e})$, namely, without knowing the underlying $\mathbf{s}$. A variant of the assumption that oblivious $\mathsf{LWE}$ sampling is hard has been used in a series of works constructing Succinct Non-interactive Arguments of Knowledge (SNARKs) in the standard model. As the assumption is related to $\mathsf{LWE}$, these SNARKs have been conjectured to be secure in the presence of quantum adversaries. Our main result is a quantum polynomial-time algorithm that samples well-distributed $\mathsf{LWE}$ instances while provably not knowing the solution, under the assumption that $\mathsf{LWE}$ is hard. Moreover, the approach works for a vast range of $\mathsf{LWE}$ parametrizations, including those used in the above-mentioned SNARKs.