P466 Ultrasound muscle assessment for sarcopenia screening in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A prospective study (SarcUS-IBD)

G. Mulinacci, L. Pirola, D. Gandola, D. Ippolito, C. Viganò, A. Laffusa, C. Gallo, P. Invernizzi, S. Danese, S. Massironi
{"title":"P466 Ultrasound muscle assessment for sarcopenia screening in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A prospective study (SarcUS-IBD)","authors":"G. Mulinacci, L. Pirola, D. Gandola, D. Ippolito, C. Viganò, A. Laffusa, C. Gallo, P. Invernizzi, S. Danese, S. Massironi","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Sarcopenia is prevalent among patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and impacts IBD patient’s surgical and therapeutic outcomes, thus necessitating effective diagnostic tools to assess muscle mass and function in this population.\n \n \n \n A total of 153 consecutive patients were enrolled, 100 in the \"training cohort\" and 53 in the \"study cohort\". Three superficial muscles (Rectus Femoris (RF), Rectus Abdominis (RA) and Biceps Brachii (BB)) were chosen for sarcopenia detection with muscle ultrasound (US). The \"training cohort\" served for feasibility and interobserver variability assessment of US measurement. In the \"study cohort\", muscle ultrasound (US), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were employed to measure muscle parameters. BIA served as the reference standard for comparison. Accuracy of a self-reported questionnaire for sarcopenia screening was assessed.\n \n \n \n The prevalence of sarcopenia in IBD patients was 50%. Muscle US demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy in detecting sarcopenia compared to BIA, with Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) values of 80% and 85% for RA and BB thickness, respectively. Moreover, an Ultrasound Muscle Index (USMI) was defined by the sum of RA, BB, and RF thickness measurements divided by the square of the patient's height, resulting in an AUROC of 81%. Several muscle cutoffs for sarcopenia were recognized, with those of RA and USMI being correlated with the highest positive (84.3%) and negative (99%) predictive values, respectively. Excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability (ICC > 0.95) were observed for US measurements. Additionally, the agreement between the US and magnetic resonance measurements of rectus abdominis was excellent (ICC 0.96).\n \n \n \n The findings of this study emphasize the potential of muscle US as a reliable diagnostic tool for assessing sarcopenia in IBD patients. The study provides cutoff values for US measurements, aiding clinicians in accurate diagnosis. Self-reported questionnaires showed limitations in identifying sarcopenia, underlining the importance of objective measures like US or BIA. Muscle loss in IBD patients appears to be associated with disease activity rather than systemic inflammatory markers. This research has significant implications for disease management in IBD patients and underscores the need for further investigations with larger cohorts and long-term follow-ups to validate these findings.\n \n","PeriodicalId":15453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sarcopenia is prevalent among patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and impacts IBD patient’s surgical and therapeutic outcomes, thus necessitating effective diagnostic tools to assess muscle mass and function in this population. A total of 153 consecutive patients were enrolled, 100 in the "training cohort" and 53 in the "study cohort". Three superficial muscles (Rectus Femoris (RF), Rectus Abdominis (RA) and Biceps Brachii (BB)) were chosen for sarcopenia detection with muscle ultrasound (US). The "training cohort" served for feasibility and interobserver variability assessment of US measurement. In the "study cohort", muscle ultrasound (US), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were employed to measure muscle parameters. BIA served as the reference standard for comparison. Accuracy of a self-reported questionnaire for sarcopenia screening was assessed. The prevalence of sarcopenia in IBD patients was 50%. Muscle US demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy in detecting sarcopenia compared to BIA, with Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) values of 80% and 85% for RA and BB thickness, respectively. Moreover, an Ultrasound Muscle Index (USMI) was defined by the sum of RA, BB, and RF thickness measurements divided by the square of the patient's height, resulting in an AUROC of 81%. Several muscle cutoffs for sarcopenia were recognized, with those of RA and USMI being correlated with the highest positive (84.3%) and negative (99%) predictive values, respectively. Excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability (ICC > 0.95) were observed for US measurements. Additionally, the agreement between the US and magnetic resonance measurements of rectus abdominis was excellent (ICC 0.96). The findings of this study emphasize the potential of muscle US as a reliable diagnostic tool for assessing sarcopenia in IBD patients. The study provides cutoff values for US measurements, aiding clinicians in accurate diagnosis. Self-reported questionnaires showed limitations in identifying sarcopenia, underlining the importance of objective measures like US or BIA. Muscle loss in IBD patients appears to be associated with disease activity rather than systemic inflammatory markers. This research has significant implications for disease management in IBD patients and underscores the need for further investigations with larger cohorts and long-term follow-ups to validate these findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P466 用于炎症性肠病患者肌肉疏松症筛查的超声波肌肉评估:前瞻性研究(SarcUS-IBD)
肌肉疏松症在炎症性肠病(IBD)患者中很普遍,会影响 IBD 患者的手术和治疗效果,因此需要有效的诊断工具来评估这类人群的肌肉质量和功能。 该研究共招募了 153 名连续患者,其中 100 人属于 "训练队列",53 人属于 "研究队列"。研究人员选择了三块浅表肌肉(股直肌(RF)、腹直肌(RA)和肱二头肌(BB))进行肌肉超声波检测。训练队列 "用于评估超声测量的可行性和观察者之间的差异性。在 "研究队列 "中,肌肉超声波(US)、生物电阻抗分析(BIA)和磁共振成像(MRI)被用来测量肌肉参数。生物电阻抗分析是进行比较的参考标准。此外,还评估了用于肌少症筛查的自我报告问卷的准确性。 肌肉疏松症在 IBD 患者中的发病率为 50%。与 BIA 相比,肌肉超声在检测肌肉疏松症方面具有良好的诊断准确性,RA 和 BB 厚度的接收者工作特征曲线下面积 (AUROC) 值分别为 80% 和 85%。此外,超声肌肉指数(USMI)是由 RA、BB 和 RF 厚度测量值的总和除以患者身高的平方来定义的,其 AUROC 值为 81%。肌肉疏松症的几个肌肉临界值已得到认可,其中 RA 和 USMI 的阳性预测值(84.3%)和阴性预测值(99%)分别最高。US 测量的评分者间和评分者内部可靠性极佳(ICC > 0.95)。此外,腹直肌的 US 和磁共振测量值之间的一致性也非常好(ICC 0.96)。 本研究结果强调了肌肉 US 作为评估 IBD 患者肌肉疏松症的可靠诊断工具的潜力。该研究为 US 测量提供了临界值,有助于临床医生进行准确诊断。自我报告问卷在确定肌肉疏松症方面存在局限性,这凸显了 US 或 BIA 等客观测量方法的重要性。IBD 患者的肌肉减少似乎与疾病活动有关,而非全身炎症指标。这项研究对 IBD 患者的疾病管理具有重要意义,同时也强调了进一步研究的必要性,即通过更大规模的队列和长期随访来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prolonged time to diagnosis of Crohn’s disease in patients with perianal fistulas negatively affects long-term outcomes Oxidized polyunsaturated fatty acid promotes colitis and colitis-associated tumorigenesis in mice Prevalence, characteristics, management, and outcomes of difficult-to-treat inflammatory bowel disease IL23R-specific CAR Tregs for the treatment of Crohn’s disease Colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: a review of the role of gut microbiota and bacterial biofilms in disease pathogenesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1