P585 Effectiveness of Switching to Subcutaneous Infliximab in Ulcerative Colitis Patients Experiencing Intravenous Infliximab Failure

J. H. Bae, J. B. Park, J. Baek, S. W. Hong, S. Park, D. H. Yang, B. Ye, J. Byeon, S. Myung, S. K. Yang, S. Hwang
{"title":"P585 Effectiveness of Switching to Subcutaneous Infliximab in Ulcerative Colitis Patients Experiencing Intravenous Infliximab Failure","authors":"J. H. Bae, J. B. Park, J. Baek, S. W. Hong, S. Park, D. H. Yang, B. Ye, J. Byeon, S. Myung, S. K. Yang, S. Hwang","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Studies on elective switching to the subcutaneous (SC) formulation of infliximab revealed comparable efficacy and safety and higher infliximab level than those exhibited by intravenous (IV) infliximab. However, no studies have reported on the effectiveness of SC switching in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who experienced IV infliximab failure during maintenance treatment.\n \n \n \n This retrospective study included UC patients who had been switched to SC infliximab because of IV infliximab failure, between January 2021 and January 2023. Group A was defined as having clinically and biochemically active UC (secondary loss of response), and group B consisted of patients with stable symptoms but biochemically active UC.\n \n \n \n Twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria: 15 in group A and 8 in group B. The serum infliximab levels significantly increased after SC switching in both groups. Electively switched group also exhibited increased infliximab levels after SC switching. Group A showed improved partial Mayo score with a significant decrease in faecal calprotectin (FC) and C-reactive protein after switching. In group B, the FC level significantly decreased without clinical relapse after switching. A high proportion of patients (≥ 80%) in both groups achieved clinical and/or biochemical response at last follow-up. During the follow-up period, only two patients in group A discontinued SC infliximab, and only one complained of severe injection site reaction.\n \n \n \n In UC patients who experience IV infliximab failure during maintenance treatment, switching to SC infliximab may be a promising option because of its efficacy and safety.\n \n \n","PeriodicalId":15453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies on elective switching to the subcutaneous (SC) formulation of infliximab revealed comparable efficacy and safety and higher infliximab level than those exhibited by intravenous (IV) infliximab. However, no studies have reported on the effectiveness of SC switching in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who experienced IV infliximab failure during maintenance treatment. This retrospective study included UC patients who had been switched to SC infliximab because of IV infliximab failure, between January 2021 and January 2023. Group A was defined as having clinically and biochemically active UC (secondary loss of response), and group B consisted of patients with stable symptoms but biochemically active UC. Twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria: 15 in group A and 8 in group B. The serum infliximab levels significantly increased after SC switching in both groups. Electively switched group also exhibited increased infliximab levels after SC switching. Group A showed improved partial Mayo score with a significant decrease in faecal calprotectin (FC) and C-reactive protein after switching. In group B, the FC level significantly decreased without clinical relapse after switching. A high proportion of patients (≥ 80%) in both groups achieved clinical and/or biochemical response at last follow-up. During the follow-up period, only two patients in group A discontinued SC infliximab, and only one complained of severe injection site reaction. In UC patients who experience IV infliximab failure during maintenance treatment, switching to SC infliximab may be a promising option because of its efficacy and safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P585 在静脉注射英夫利西单抗失败的溃疡性结肠炎患者中改用皮下注射英夫利西单抗的效果
关于选择改用英夫利西单抗皮下注射制剂的研究显示,与静脉注射英夫利西单抗相比,皮下注射英夫利西单抗的疗效和安全性相当,英夫利西单抗水平也更高。然而,对于在维持治疗期间静脉注射英夫利西单抗失败的溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者,还没有关于皮下注射英夫利西单抗的有效性的研究报告。 这项回顾性研究纳入了 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月期间因静脉注射英夫利西单抗失败而改用静脉注射英夫利西单抗的 UC 患者。A组定义为临床和生化活动性UC(继发性应答丧失),B组包括症状稳定但生化活动性UC患者。 23 名患者符合纳入标准:两组患者的血清英夫利西单抗水平在SC转换后均显著升高。选择性换药组在换药后也显示出英夫利西单抗水平的升高。A 组的部分梅奥评分有所改善,换药后粪便钙粘蛋白(FC)和 C 反应蛋白明显下降。在 B 组中,换药后 FC 水平明显下降,但无临床复发。在最后一次随访中,两组中均有很高比例的患者(≥ 80%)获得了临床和/或生化应答。在随访期间,A 组仅有两名患者停用了 SC 英夫利西单抗,仅有一名患者抱怨出现了严重的注射部位反应。 对于在维持治疗过程中静脉注射英夫利西单抗失败的 UC 患者,改用 SC 英夫利西单抗可能是一个很有前途的选择,因为它既有效又安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prolonged time to diagnosis of Crohn’s disease in patients with perianal fistulas negatively affects long-term outcomes Oxidized polyunsaturated fatty acid promotes colitis and colitis-associated tumorigenesis in mice Prevalence, characteristics, management, and outcomes of difficult-to-treat inflammatory bowel disease IL23R-specific CAR Tregs for the treatment of Crohn’s disease Colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: a review of the role of gut microbiota and bacterial biofilms in disease pathogenesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1