P468 Relevance of anti-drug antibodies in context of supra-therapeutic anti-TNF concentrations

J. Kim, M. Walshe, K. Borowski, R. Milgrom, J. Stempak, S. Lee, K. Croitoru, M. Silverberg
{"title":"P468 Relevance of anti-drug antibodies in context of supra-therapeutic anti-TNF concentrations","authors":"J. Kim, M. Walshe, K. Borowski, R. Milgrom, J. Stempak, S. Lee, K. Croitoru, M. Silverberg","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The low serum concentration of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNFα) agents and the presence of anti-drug antibodies are related to poor therapeutic outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to evaluate the prognosis of patients having both antidrug antibodies and supratherapeutic drug concentrations.\n \n \n \n IBD patients on maintenance infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA) therapy were prospectively recruited. Serum drug concentrations and antidrug antibodies were measured (Anser, Prometheus). The drug concentrations were classified as subtherapeutic (IFX: <3 µg/mL; ADA: <5 µg/mL), therapeutic (IFX: 3-8 µg/mL; ADA 5-10 µg/mL), and supratherapeutic (IFX > 8 µg/mL; ADA > 10 µg/mL) concentrations regardless of the timing of blood sample collection. We analysed the relationship between i) drug concentrations and ii) the presence and absence of anti-drug antibodies with use of systemic corticosteroids and anti-TNF discontinuation.\n \n \n \n Of 172 patients (122 CD [70.9%], 44 UC [25.6%], 3 IBD-U [1.7%], and 3 IBD-pouch [1.7%]), the median age was 32.3 years (range, 24.8-42.5), and the median duration of IBD was 9.7 years (range 5.3-15.6). IFX and ADA were used in 81 (47.1%) and 91 (52.9%) patients, respectively, and concurrent usage of immunomodulators and systemic corticosteroids was observed in 39 (22.7%) and 23 (13.4%) patients, respectively. Supratherapeutic, therapeutic, and subtherapeutic concentrations were observed in 74 (43.0%), 32 (18.6%), and 66 (38.4%), respectively. The patients with antidrug antibodies (n = 79, 45.9%) showed a higher frequency of having subtherapeutic drug concentrations (68.4% vs 12.9%, P < 0.001) compared to those without antibodies, and the presence of antibodies was an independent predictor of discontinuation of anti-TNFα agents (hazard ratio 3.50, 95% confidence interval 1.88-6.51, P < 0.001, Fig. 1A). In subgroup analysis, patients with antidrug antibodies and supratherapeutic drug concentration exhibited a tendency to have improved drug persistence compared to those with subtherapeutic drug concentration, albeit insignificantly (P = 0.099, Fig. 1B). However, the persistence in this group was still poorer than that observed in patients without antibodies (P = 0.003). Finally, neither anti-TNFα concentrations nor the presence of antidrug antibodies were associated with the need for additional systemic corticosteroid use within 6 months.\n \n \n \n The presence of antidrug antibodies can predict the discontinuation of anti-TNFα agents despite supratherapeutic drug levels. While supratherapeutic drug concentration may improve the treatment persistence of anti-TNFα agents in patients with anti-drug antibodies, it does not last as long as in those without antibodies.\n \n","PeriodicalId":15453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","volume":"355 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The low serum concentration of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNFα) agents and the presence of anti-drug antibodies are related to poor therapeutic outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to evaluate the prognosis of patients having both antidrug antibodies and supratherapeutic drug concentrations. IBD patients on maintenance infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA) therapy were prospectively recruited. Serum drug concentrations and antidrug antibodies were measured (Anser, Prometheus). The drug concentrations were classified as subtherapeutic (IFX: <3 µg/mL; ADA: <5 µg/mL), therapeutic (IFX: 3-8 µg/mL; ADA 5-10 µg/mL), and supratherapeutic (IFX > 8 µg/mL; ADA > 10 µg/mL) concentrations regardless of the timing of blood sample collection. We analysed the relationship between i) drug concentrations and ii) the presence and absence of anti-drug antibodies with use of systemic corticosteroids and anti-TNF discontinuation. Of 172 patients (122 CD [70.9%], 44 UC [25.6%], 3 IBD-U [1.7%], and 3 IBD-pouch [1.7%]), the median age was 32.3 years (range, 24.8-42.5), and the median duration of IBD was 9.7 years (range 5.3-15.6). IFX and ADA were used in 81 (47.1%) and 91 (52.9%) patients, respectively, and concurrent usage of immunomodulators and systemic corticosteroids was observed in 39 (22.7%) and 23 (13.4%) patients, respectively. Supratherapeutic, therapeutic, and subtherapeutic concentrations were observed in 74 (43.0%), 32 (18.6%), and 66 (38.4%), respectively. The patients with antidrug antibodies (n = 79, 45.9%) showed a higher frequency of having subtherapeutic drug concentrations (68.4% vs 12.9%, P < 0.001) compared to those without antibodies, and the presence of antibodies was an independent predictor of discontinuation of anti-TNFα agents (hazard ratio 3.50, 95% confidence interval 1.88-6.51, P < 0.001, Fig. 1A). In subgroup analysis, patients with antidrug antibodies and supratherapeutic drug concentration exhibited a tendency to have improved drug persistence compared to those with subtherapeutic drug concentration, albeit insignificantly (P = 0.099, Fig. 1B). However, the persistence in this group was still poorer than that observed in patients without antibodies (P = 0.003). Finally, neither anti-TNFα concentrations nor the presence of antidrug antibodies were associated with the need for additional systemic corticosteroid use within 6 months. The presence of antidrug antibodies can predict the discontinuation of anti-TNFα agents despite supratherapeutic drug levels. While supratherapeutic drug concentration may improve the treatment persistence of anti-TNFα agents in patients with anti-drug antibodies, it does not last as long as in those without antibodies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P468 抗药物抗体与超治疗浓度抗肿瘤坏死因子的相关性
抗肿瘤坏死因子-α(anti-TNFα)药物血清浓度低和抗药抗体的存在与炎症性肠病(IBD)治疗效果不佳有关。我们旨在评估同时存在抗药抗体和超治疗药物浓度的患者的预后。 我们前瞻性地招募了正在接受英夫利西单抗(IFX)或阿达木单抗(ADA)维持治疗的 IBD 患者。对血清药物浓度和抗药抗体进行了测定(Anser,Prometheus)。无论血样采集时间如何,药物浓度都被归类为亚治疗浓度(IFX:8 µg/mL;ADA > 10 µg/mL)。我们分析了 i) 药物浓度和 ii) 抗药性抗体的存在与否与使用全身性皮质类固醇激素和停用抗肿瘤坏死因子之间的关系。 在 172 名患者(122 名 CD [70.9%]、44 名 UC [25.6%]、3 名 IBD-U [1.7%] 和 3 名 IBD-袋 [1.7%])中,中位年龄为 32.3 岁(范围为 24.8-42.5),中位 IBD 病程为 9.7 年(范围为 5.3-15.6)。81(47.1%)和 91(52.9%)名患者使用了 IFX 和 ADA,39(22.7%)和 23(13.4%)名患者同时使用了免疫调节剂和系统性皮质类固醇激素。在 74 例(43.0%)、32 例(18.6%)和 66 例(38.4%)患者中分别观察到超治疗浓度、治疗浓度和亚治疗浓度。与没有抗体的患者相比,有抗药抗体的患者(n = 79,45.9%)出现亚治疗药物浓度的频率更高(68.4% vs 12.9%,P < 0.001),而且抗体的存在是停用抗肿瘤坏死因子α药物的独立预测因素(危险比 3.50,95% 置信区间 1.88-6.51,P < 0.001,图 1A)。在亚组分析中,与药物浓度低于治疗水平的患者相比,具有抗药抗体和药物浓度高于治疗水平的患者的药物持续性有改善的趋势,尽管效果不显著(P = 0.099,图 1B)。然而,这组患者的持续用药情况仍然比没有抗体的患者差(P = 0.003)。最后,无论是抗 TNFα 浓度还是抗药抗体的存在,都与 6 个月内是否需要额外使用全身性皮质类固醇无关。 尽管抗肿瘤坏死因子α的药物浓度超过治疗水平,但抗药抗体的存在仍可预测抗肿瘤坏死因子α药物的停药情况。虽然超治疗药物浓度可改善抗肿瘤坏死因子α药物在有抗药抗体患者中的治疗持久性,但其持续时间不如无抗体患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prolonged time to diagnosis of Crohn’s disease in patients with perianal fistulas negatively affects long-term outcomes Oxidized polyunsaturated fatty acid promotes colitis and colitis-associated tumorigenesis in mice Prevalence, characteristics, management, and outcomes of difficult-to-treat inflammatory bowel disease IL23R-specific CAR Tregs for the treatment of Crohn’s disease Colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: a review of the role of gut microbiota and bacterial biofilms in disease pathogenesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1