Evaluation of guideline implementation for dispensing driving-impairing medicines by National Pharmacy Organizations

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100415
H. de Gier , L. Bogaard , V.F. Siu , B. Todorov , G. Sousa Pinto , R. Viegas , N. Aldarij , L. van Dijk , S.D. Borgsteede
{"title":"Evaluation of guideline implementation for dispensing driving-impairing medicines by National Pharmacy Organizations","authors":"H. de Gier ,&nbsp;L. Bogaard ,&nbsp;V.F. Siu ,&nbsp;B. Todorov ,&nbsp;G. Sousa Pinto ,&nbsp;R. Viegas ,&nbsp;N. Aldarij ,&nbsp;L. van Dijk ,&nbsp;S.D. Borgsteede","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In 2004, the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) adopted a Statement of Professional Standard on the supply of medicines affecting driving performance, transformed to FIP guidelines in 2014. In 2011, the final report from the European initiative on Driving Under the Influence of Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines (DRUID) was published. Both documents provided recommendations for improving dispensing guidelines for driving-impairing medicines for patients who use psychoactive medicines.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study investigated the extent that European professional organizations of pharmacists (POPs) implemented existing guidelines and DRUID results.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An online questionnaire survey was conducted in April–May 2022. Questionnaires were sent by e-mail to POPs in 46 European countries. The questionnaire addressed the following topics: awareness of FIP guidelines and DRUID outcomes (a), development of dispensing guidelines (b), target groups for information materials (c), evaluations of dispensing practices (d), examples of projects on medicines affecting driving fitness (e), development of ICT (Information and Communication Technology) -support (f), collaboration with organizations of physicians (g), and patients (h). The data were analyzed by indicating implementation initiatives in different countries. Open-ended questions were assessed qualitatively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>POPs in 23 European countries responded to the invitation (response rate: 50%). Guidelines for improving dispensing practices were available in 5 countries targeted at professionals, patients, and the general population. Patient and physician organizations were involved in 4 and 3 countries, respectively. Implementation was supported by computerized dispensing systems (5 countries) and public campaigns (5 countries).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Twenty years after the introduction of FIP guidelines and ten years after the DRUID outcomes, only 5 European POPs have implemented this knowledge. Different activities were performed to support implementation, resulting in examples of successful use of recommendations for driving-impairing medicines in pharmacy practice. Implementation needs further attention. The successful practices that have been developed are an example for dissemination to other countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000106/pdfft?md5=cf6757c9b4fe28d058ce85b6fdb0d3c1&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624000106-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In 2004, the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) adopted a Statement of Professional Standard on the supply of medicines affecting driving performance, transformed to FIP guidelines in 2014. In 2011, the final report from the European initiative on Driving Under the Influence of Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines (DRUID) was published. Both documents provided recommendations for improving dispensing guidelines for driving-impairing medicines for patients who use psychoactive medicines.

Objective

This study investigated the extent that European professional organizations of pharmacists (POPs) implemented existing guidelines and DRUID results.

Methods

An online questionnaire survey was conducted in April–May 2022. Questionnaires were sent by e-mail to POPs in 46 European countries. The questionnaire addressed the following topics: awareness of FIP guidelines and DRUID outcomes (a), development of dispensing guidelines (b), target groups for information materials (c), evaluations of dispensing practices (d), examples of projects on medicines affecting driving fitness (e), development of ICT (Information and Communication Technology) -support (f), collaboration with organizations of physicians (g), and patients (h). The data were analyzed by indicating implementation initiatives in different countries. Open-ended questions were assessed qualitatively.

Results

POPs in 23 European countries responded to the invitation (response rate: 50%). Guidelines for improving dispensing practices were available in 5 countries targeted at professionals, patients, and the general population. Patient and physician organizations were involved in 4 and 3 countries, respectively. Implementation was supported by computerized dispensing systems (5 countries) and public campaigns (5 countries).

Conclusions

Twenty years after the introduction of FIP guidelines and ten years after the DRUID outcomes, only 5 European POPs have implemented this knowledge. Different activities were performed to support implementation, resulting in examples of successful use of recommendations for driving-impairing medicines in pharmacy practice. Implementation needs further attention. The successful practices that have been developed are an example for dissemination to other countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家药房组织对影响驾驶药品配药指南实施情况的评估
背景2004年,国际药学联合会(FIP)通过了《关于影响驾驶性能的药品供应的专业标准声明》,并于2014年转化为FIP指南。2011 年,欧洲关于在药物、酒精和药品影响下驾驶(DRUID)的倡议发布了最终报告。本研究调查了欧洲药剂师专业组织(POPs)执行现有指南和 DRUID 结果的程度。通过电子邮件向 46 个欧洲国家的 POP 发送了问卷。问卷涉及以下主题:对 FIP 指南和 DRUID 结果的认识(a)、配药指南的制定(b)、信息资料的目标群体(c)、配药实践的评估(d)、影响驾驶健康的药物项目实例(e)、ICT(信息和通信技术)支持的发展(f)、与医生组织的合作(g)和患者(h)。通过指出不同国家的实施举措对数据进行了分析。对开放式问题进行了定性评估。结果 23 个欧洲国家的 POP 响应了邀请(响应率:50%)。5 个国家提供了针对专业人员、患者和普通民众的配药实践改进指南。分别有 4 个国家和 3 个国家的患者和医生组织参与其中。结论在引入 FIP 指南 20 年和 DRUID 成果 10 年后,只有 5 个欧洲持久性有机污染物国家实施了这一知识。为支持实施工作,开展了不同的活动,并在药学实践中成功使用了有关影响驾驶药物的建议。实施工作需要进一步关注。已开发的成功实践是向其他国家推广的范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Montelukast deprescribing in outpatient specialty clinics: A single center cross-sectional study Appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand Comparing nursing medication rounds before and after implementation of automated dispensing cabinets: A time and motion study Translation, transcultural adaptation, and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the general medication adherence scale (GMAS) in patients with high blood pressure A cross-sectional survey exploring organizational readiness to implement community pharmacy-based opioid counseling and naloxone services in rural versus urban settings in Alabama
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1