The future of midwife-led continuity of care: Call for a dialogue

Yvonne J. Kuipers
{"title":"The future of midwife-led continuity of care: Call for a dialogue","authors":"Yvonne J. Kuipers","doi":"10.1016/j.dialog.2024.100170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Purpose</h3><p>Midwife-led continuity of care (MLCC) is an evidence-based care model positively influencing the health and wellbeing of women and their families. Despite the evidence, a sustainable future of the model is uncertain. The aim of this paper is to give an example of a theoretical exercise that enhances the understanding of the trends and developments impacting MLCC’s future state.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The industrial complex theory scaffolded the theoretical approach. The intuitive logics scenario development methodology was used to structure the key variables that influence the utility of MLCC. Dimensionally structured scenarios representing the probable, possible and probable MLCC futures were written.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirteen key variables that greatly impact the future MLCC, with varying degrees of certainty were identified. A theoretical framework representing two underlying meta dimensions of MLCC was constructed: <em>identity system of midwife-led continuity of care (fixed vs fluid)</em> and <em>embodied orientation to the world (reasoning vs meaning making)</em>. Within the framework, four different storylines of possible, plausible prospective futures emerged: <em>Sense &amp; sensibility</em>, <em>The birth of mothers</em>, <em>Too many sisters</em> and <em>One-stop-shop</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The paper is an example of how to approach the future of MLCC, the method serving as a tool to establish a theoretical truth of how its future state may unfold, the scenarios facilitating a dialogue among stakeholders and informing the public.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72803,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in health","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653324000066/pdfft?md5=09cd0ce5bee0989ce46fca32f38c7773&pid=1-s2.0-S2772653324000066-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653324000066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Purpose

Midwife-led continuity of care (MLCC) is an evidence-based care model positively influencing the health and wellbeing of women and their families. Despite the evidence, a sustainable future of the model is uncertain. The aim of this paper is to give an example of a theoretical exercise that enhances the understanding of the trends and developments impacting MLCC’s future state.

Methods

The industrial complex theory scaffolded the theoretical approach. The intuitive logics scenario development methodology was used to structure the key variables that influence the utility of MLCC. Dimensionally structured scenarios representing the probable, possible and probable MLCC futures were written.

Results

Thirteen key variables that greatly impact the future MLCC, with varying degrees of certainty were identified. A theoretical framework representing two underlying meta dimensions of MLCC was constructed: identity system of midwife-led continuity of care (fixed vs fluid) and embodied orientation to the world (reasoning vs meaning making). Within the framework, four different storylines of possible, plausible prospective futures emerged: Sense & sensibility, The birth of mothers, Too many sisters and One-stop-shop.

Conclusion

The paper is an example of how to approach the future of MLCC, the method serving as a tool to establish a theoretical truth of how its future state may unfold, the scenarios facilitating a dialogue among stakeholders and informing the public.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
助产士主导的持续护理的未来:呼吁对话
背景/目的 以助产士为主导的连续性护理(MLCC)是一种以证据为基础的护理模式,对妇女及其家庭的健康和幸福有着积极的影响。尽管证据确凿,但该模式的可持续发展前景并不明朗。本文旨在举例说明一种理论实践,以加深对影响 MLCC 未来状态的趋势和发展的理解。直观逻辑情景开发方法用于构建影响 MLCC 功用的关键变量。结果确定了对未来 MLCC 有重大影响的 13 个关键变量,其确定程度各不相同。我们构建了一个理论框架,代表了 MLCC 的两个基本元维度:助产士主导的连续性护理身份系统(固定与流动)和对世界的体现性定位(推理与意义建构)。在这一框架内,出现了四种不同的故事情节,描述了可能的、合理的未来前景:结论:本文是一个关于如何展望助产士连续护理中心未来的范例,该方法可作为一种工具,为助产士连续护理中心的未来状态如何发展建立理论依据,这些设想方案可促进利益相关者之间的对话,并向公众提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dialogues in health
Dialogues in health Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Fishing with skis, digging with noodles: Resolving task-and-tool mismatches in efforts to advance health equity Blurred vision: The ophthalmological effect of smog in Pakistan Correlation between fall experience and life functions among community-dwelling older adults in Japan Breaking barriers: A gender-based quota system in nursing school admission in Bangladesh Success rates and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among treatment-naïve patients in Davao City, Philippines: A ten-year retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1