Determinants of long acting reversible contraceptive utilisation among women of reproductive age at Balaka district hospital, Malawi

Chank Mwalweni, Ellen Mbweza Chirwa, Eveles Banda Chimala
{"title":"Determinants of long acting reversible contraceptive utilisation among women of reproductive age at Balaka district hospital, Malawi","authors":"Chank Mwalweni,&nbsp;Ellen Mbweza Chirwa,&nbsp;Eveles Banda Chimala","doi":"10.1016/j.ijans.2024.100659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Limited studies have examined the factors associated with utilisation of long acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) in Malawi. The purpose of this study was to assess prevalence and determinants of LARC utilisation among women of reproductive age at Balaka district hospital, Malawi.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Facility based cross-sectional study was conducted from 4th July to 28th September 2022. A total of 216 women of reproductive age were selected by a systematic random sampling technique. Data collection was done through face-to-face interviews using a structured and pre-tested questionnaire. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to examine the association between independent variables and utilisation of LARCs. Results were presented as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with statistical precision at p ≤ 0.05 and 95 % confidence interval (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The prevalence of LARC utilisation at the study site was 26.4 %. Couple discussion (AOR = 7.169;95 % CI:1.872–27.453), partner approval (AOR = 11.157; 95 % CI:3.039–40.960), history of unplanned pregnancy (AOR = 3.099; 95 % CI: 1.114–8.622), fear of unplanned pregnancy (AOR = 3.605;95 % CI:1.286–10.107), counselling on LARCs (AOR = 3.829; 95 % CI: 1.070–13.654), number of children (AOR = 1.504; 95 % CI:1.044–2.167) and waiting time at clinic (AOR = 0.315;95 % CI: 0.174–0.571) were identified as the determinants of LARC utilisation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study found low overall utilisation of LARCs. Strategies to increase LARCs utilisation should consider promoting men’s involvement in family planning (FP) activities and address health system related factors including long waiting time at clinic and strengthening counselling on LARC methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38091,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214139124000040/pdfft?md5=aed11152c011019dcd7ca657ed4343cd&pid=1-s2.0-S2214139124000040-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214139124000040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Limited studies have examined the factors associated with utilisation of long acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) in Malawi. The purpose of this study was to assess prevalence and determinants of LARC utilisation among women of reproductive age at Balaka district hospital, Malawi.

Study design

Facility based cross-sectional study was conducted from 4th July to 28th September 2022. A total of 216 women of reproductive age were selected by a systematic random sampling technique. Data collection was done through face-to-face interviews using a structured and pre-tested questionnaire. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to examine the association between independent variables and utilisation of LARCs. Results were presented as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with statistical precision at p ≤ 0.05 and 95 % confidence interval (CI).

Results

The prevalence of LARC utilisation at the study site was 26.4 %. Couple discussion (AOR = 7.169;95 % CI:1.872–27.453), partner approval (AOR = 11.157; 95 % CI:3.039–40.960), history of unplanned pregnancy (AOR = 3.099; 95 % CI: 1.114–8.622), fear of unplanned pregnancy (AOR = 3.605;95 % CI:1.286–10.107), counselling on LARCs (AOR = 3.829; 95 % CI: 1.070–13.654), number of children (AOR = 1.504; 95 % CI:1.044–2.167) and waiting time at clinic (AOR = 0.315;95 % CI: 0.174–0.571) were identified as the determinants of LARC utilisation.

Conclusion

The study found low overall utilisation of LARCs. Strategies to increase LARCs utilisation should consider promoting men’s involvement in family planning (FP) activities and address health system related factors including long waiting time at clinic and strengthening counselling on LARC methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马拉维巴拉卡地区医院育龄妇女使用长效可逆避孕药的决定因素
目标对马拉维长效可逆避孕药(LARC)使用相关因素的研究有限。本研究旨在评估马拉维巴拉卡地区医院育龄妇女使用长效可逆避孕药具(LARC)的流行程度和决定因素。研究采用系统随机抽样技术,共选取了 216 名育龄妇女。数据收集是通过预先测试的结构化问卷进行面对面访谈。为研究自变量与 LARCs 使用情况之间的关系,进行了二元和多元逻辑回归。结果以调整后的几率比(AOR)表示,统计精度为 p ≤ 0.05 和 95 % 的置信区间(CI)。夫妻讨论(AOR = 7.169;95 % CI:1.872-27.453)、伴侣同意(AOR = 11.157;95 % CI:3.039-40.960)、意外怀孕史(AOR = 3.099;95 % CI:1.114-8.622)、对意外怀孕的恐惧(AOR = 3.605;95 % CI:1.286-10.107)、LARC 咨询(AOR = 3.829; 95 % CI: 1.070-13.654) 、孩子数量 (AOR = 1.504; 95 % CI:1.044-2.167) 和在诊所的等待时间 (AOR = 0.315;95 % CI: 0.174-0.571) 被确定为 LARC 使用的决定因素。提高 LARCs 使用率的策略应考虑促进男性参与计划生育 (FP) 活动,解决卫生系统相关因素,包括门诊等候时间过长和加强 LARC 方法咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences (IJANS) is an international scientific journal published by Elsevier. The broad-based journal was founded on two key tenets, i.e. to publish the most exciting research with respect to the subjects of Nursing and Midwifery in Africa, and secondly, to advance the international understanding and development of nursing and midwifery in Africa, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The fully refereed journal provides a forum for all aspects of nursing and midwifery sciences, especially new trends and advances. The journal call for original research papers, systematic and scholarly review articles, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing as related to nursing and midwifery in Africa, technical reports, and short communications, and which will meet the journal''s high academic and ethical standards. Manuscripts of nursing practice, education, management, and research are encouraged. The journal values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic significance for educators, practitioners, leaders and policy-makers of nursing and midwifery in Africa. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of nursing, and is also inviting international scholars who are engaged with nursing and midwifery in Africa to contribute to the journal. We will only publish work that demonstrates the use of rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of nursing and midwifery as it relates to the Africa context.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to ‘Factors affecting HIV disclosure among partners in Morogoro, Tanzania’ [International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences Volume 10, (2019) 49-54] Tracer study to assess the employability of graduates and quality of a nursing program: A descriptive cross-sectional survey Factors that influence the quality of work life in nursing departments: A management perspective Roles, perceptions, and context of nursing student clinical facilitation in sub-Saharan Africa: An integrative review Birth stories of South African mothers of children with albinism: A critical human rights analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1