Do Analysts and Investors Efficiently Respond to Managerial Linguistic Complexity during Conference Calls?

Brian J. Bushee, Ying Huang
{"title":"Do Analysts and Investors Efficiently Respond to Managerial Linguistic Complexity during Conference Calls?","authors":"Brian J. Bushee, Ying Huang","doi":"10.2308/tar-2019-0358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper examines whether analysts and investors efficiently incorporate the informational signals from managerial linguistic complexity (e.g., Fog) into their forecasts and trading decisions. We predict that a manager’s Fog during a conference call provides a signal of their private information through their willingness to engage with analyst questions. We find that informative (obfuscatory) managerial Fog provides a positive (negative) signal of future earnings growth. We also find that analysts efficiently revise their forecasts to both positive and negative signals, whereas investors only correctly interpret obfuscation during the call; there is a delayed price reaction to informative Fog. However, when buy-side investors ask questions during a call, we find an efficient price reaction to informative Fog. Our findings highlight an important benefit of two-way interactive disclosures and underline the importance of active call participation for efficiently incorporating linguistic signals of managers’ private information.\n Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text.\n JEL Classifications: D82; G14; G20; M41.","PeriodicalId":503285,"journal":{"name":"The Accounting Review","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2019-0358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines whether analysts and investors efficiently incorporate the informational signals from managerial linguistic complexity (e.g., Fog) into their forecasts and trading decisions. We predict that a manager’s Fog during a conference call provides a signal of their private information through their willingness to engage with analyst questions. We find that informative (obfuscatory) managerial Fog provides a positive (negative) signal of future earnings growth. We also find that analysts efficiently revise their forecasts to both positive and negative signals, whereas investors only correctly interpret obfuscation during the call; there is a delayed price reaction to informative Fog. However, when buy-side investors ask questions during a call, we find an efficient price reaction to informative Fog. Our findings highlight an important benefit of two-way interactive disclosures and underline the importance of active call participation for efficiently incorporating linguistic signals of managers’ private information. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: D82; G14; G20; M41.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析师和投资者在电话会议中是否能有效地应对管理者的语言复杂性?
本文探讨了分析师和投资者是否能有效地将来自经理人语言复杂性(如 Fog)的信息信号纳入其预测和交易决策中。我们预测,经理人在电话会议中的 Fog 会通过其回答分析师问题的意愿提供其私人信息的信号。我们发现,信息性(模糊性)的经理人 "雾 "提供了未来盈利增长的积极(消极)信号。我们还发现,分析师对积极和消极信号都能有效地修正他们的预测,而投资者只能在电话会议中正确理解模糊信号;对信息雾的价格反应是延迟的。然而,当买方投资者在电话会议期间提出问题时,我们发现价格对信息性迷雾做出了有效反应。我们的研究结果凸显了双向互动披露的一个重要优势,并强调了积极参与电话会议对于有效纳入管理者私人信息语言信号的重要性。数据可用性:数据可从文中引用的公开来源获得。JEL 分类:D82; G14; G20D82;G14;G20;M41。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strategic Disclosure Incentives in a Multisegment Firm Is Customers’ Financial Reporting Quality Associated with Suppliers’ Decision to Contract? Classifying Forecasts The Effect of Financial Audits on Governance Practices: Evidence from the Nonprofit Sector Market Access and Retail Investment Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1