Reflection in teaching: Goals, techniques, contradictions

N. Maklakova, I. Maklakov
{"title":"Reflection in teaching: Goals, techniques, contradictions","authors":"N. Maklakova, I. Maklakov","doi":"10.20339/am.01-24.084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents an analysis of the current state of reflexive teaching process (RTP), which today receives serious attention in domestic and foreign theory and practice of teaching due to the fact that improving the quality of education requires special attention to the personality of the teacher as the central link of the entire educational process, its system-forming component. An original interpretation of this concept is proposed through the understanding of RTP as a crosscutting pedagogical practice that accompanies the teacher throughout his/her professional activity, which allows overcoming the existing diversity of approaches to its interpretation in the context of actual goals and objectives. Special attention is paid to reflexive teaching (RT). The subject of RT is a teacher who evaluates his/ her own teaching practice, studies the effectiveness of his/her choice of curricula, materials, methods and techniques, taking into account feedback from students and colleagues and making changes to the teaching process to increase its productivity. Whereas the subject of reflexive learning is a student reflecting on his/her learning experience, studying his/her own learning strategies and making adjustments to improve his/her own results. The techniques of RT and the problems faced by teachers in the process of its implementation in practice are investigated. Based on the analysis, contradictions in the theory and practice of RT underlying these problems are revealed.","PeriodicalId":179308,"journal":{"name":"Alma mater. Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly","volume":"7 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alma mater. Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20339/am.01-24.084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents an analysis of the current state of reflexive teaching process (RTP), which today receives serious attention in domestic and foreign theory and practice of teaching due to the fact that improving the quality of education requires special attention to the personality of the teacher as the central link of the entire educational process, its system-forming component. An original interpretation of this concept is proposed through the understanding of RTP as a crosscutting pedagogical practice that accompanies the teacher throughout his/her professional activity, which allows overcoming the existing diversity of approaches to its interpretation in the context of actual goals and objectives. Special attention is paid to reflexive teaching (RT). The subject of RT is a teacher who evaluates his/ her own teaching practice, studies the effectiveness of his/her choice of curricula, materials, methods and techniques, taking into account feedback from students and colleagues and making changes to the teaching process to increase its productivity. Whereas the subject of reflexive learning is a student reflecting on his/her learning experience, studying his/her own learning strategies and making adjustments to improve his/her own results. The techniques of RT and the problems faced by teachers in the process of its implementation in practice are investigated. Based on the analysis, contradictions in the theory and practice of RT underlying these problems are revealed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教学反思:目标、技巧、矛盾
文章对反思性教学过程(RTP)的现状进行了分析。由于提高教育质量需要特别关注作为整个教育过程中心环节的教师个性及其系统形成部分,反思性教学过程(RTP)如今在国内外教学理论和实践中受到了高度重视。通过将 RTP 理解为伴随教师整个职业活动的横向教学实践,对这一概念提出了新颖的解释,从而克服了在实际目标和目的背景下解释这一概念的现有方法的多样性。反思性教学(RT)受到特别关注。反思性教学的主体是对自己的教学实践进行评估的教师,研究其选择的课程、教材、方法和技巧的有效性,同时考虑学生和同事的反馈意见,并对教学过程进行修改,以提高教学效率。而反思性学习的主体是学生,他/她反思自己的学习经历,研究自己的学习策略,并做出调整以提高自己的学习成绩。本文研究了 RT 的技术以及教师在实践中实施 RT 的过程中所面临的问题。在分析的基础上,揭示了这些问题背后所隐含的 RT 理论与实践的矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modern educational and methodological support for the educational process in foreign language classes in digitalization of society “Open University”: Conceptualization and Schematization of University 3.0 from the perspective of a System-Thinking-Activity (STA) approach (Part 2) Sixty years in the service of the Fatherland: Vocation — military pedagogy Activities of Khoresm women on the fronts of the World War II Generalization of the best educational practices in higher education (based on the results of a survey of finalists of the RANEPA Pedagogical Excellence Competition)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1