Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients With Long COVID

Lotte Sørensen PhD , Camilla Lundgren Pedersen PT , Mads Jønsson Andersen MD, PhD , Johannes Martin Schmid MD, PhD , Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard PhD , Berit Schiøttz-Christensen MD , Søren Sperling MD
{"title":"Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients With Long COVID","authors":"Lotte Sørensen PhD ,&nbsp;Camilla Lundgren Pedersen PT ,&nbsp;Mads Jønsson Andersen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Johannes Martin Schmid MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard PhD ,&nbsp;Berit Schiøttz-Christensen MD ,&nbsp;Søren Sperling MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2024.100036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>After COVID-19, some patients present with ongoing symptoms (eg, breathlessness, exercise limitations), even after mild acute infection.</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>What is the exercise capacity of patients diagnosed with long COVID and does it change from baseline to 1-year follow-up?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><p>This retrospective case series included patients with persistent symptoms after a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Exercise capacity was examined by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), and parameters related to performance, ventilation, circulation, and gas exchange were compared with predicted values. A subgroup of patients was retested 1 year after baseline, and self-reported physical fitness was assessed at follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 169 patients completed baseline CPET and 41 patients completed 1-year follow-up. Mean maximum workload was 172 W (95% CI, 161-182), with 19% not achieving at least 84% predicted workload. Mean peak oxygen uptake was 24.4 mL/kg/min (95% CI, 23.1-25.7), and 36% had a value below % predicted. Oxygen uptake/workload slope below the normal threshold of 8.4 mL/min/W was observed in 54% of patients. The 1-year follow-up results showed no statistically significant changes in any of the CPET parameters, which correspond to lack of improvement in self-reported physical fitness.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Patients with long COVID demonstrated lowered peak oxygen uptake, oxygen uptake/workload slope, and/or ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide, but different parameters were lowered in different patients, illustrating a heterogeneous study population. No improvements in any parameters were found at 1-year follow-up.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100036"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789224000023/pdfft?md5=9e470b0313c45124451b2141b1a32449&pid=1-s2.0-S2949789224000023-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789224000023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

After COVID-19, some patients present with ongoing symptoms (eg, breathlessness, exercise limitations), even after mild acute infection.

Research Question

What is the exercise capacity of patients diagnosed with long COVID and does it change from baseline to 1-year follow-up?

Study Design and Methods

This retrospective case series included patients with persistent symptoms after a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Exercise capacity was examined by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), and parameters related to performance, ventilation, circulation, and gas exchange were compared with predicted values. A subgroup of patients was retested 1 year after baseline, and self-reported physical fitness was assessed at follow-up.

Results

In total, 169 patients completed baseline CPET and 41 patients completed 1-year follow-up. Mean maximum workload was 172 W (95% CI, 161-182), with 19% not achieving at least 84% predicted workload. Mean peak oxygen uptake was 24.4 mL/kg/min (95% CI, 23.1-25.7), and 36% had a value below % predicted. Oxygen uptake/workload slope below the normal threshold of 8.4 mL/min/W was observed in 54% of patients. The 1-year follow-up results showed no statistically significant changes in any of the CPET parameters, which correspond to lack of improvement in self-reported physical fitness.

Interpretation

Patients with long COVID demonstrated lowered peak oxygen uptake, oxygen uptake/workload slope, and/or ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide, but different parameters were lowered in different patients, illustrating a heterogeneous study population. No improvements in any parameters were found at 1-year follow-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长 COVID 患者的心肺运动测试:评估功能能力和运动限制
背景COVID-19后,一些患者会出现持续症状(如呼吸困难、运动受限),即使是在轻度急性感染后也是如此。研究问题确诊为长COVID的患者的运动能力如何,从基线到1年随访期间运动能力是否会发生变化?通过心肺运动测试(CPET)检查患者的运动能力,并将与运动能力、通气、循环和气体交换相关的参数与预测值进行比较。结果共有 169 名患者完成了基线 CPET,41 名患者完成了为期 1 年的随访。平均最大工作量为 172 W(95% CI,161-182),19% 的患者未达到至少 84% 的预测工作量。平均峰值摄氧量为 24.4 mL/kg/min(95% CI,23.1-25.7),36% 的摄氧量低于预测值。54%的患者的摄氧量/工作量斜率低于正常阈值 8.4 毫升/分钟/瓦。长 COVID 患者的峰值摄氧量、摄氧量/工作负荷斜率和/或二氧化碳通气当量均有所降低,但不同患者的参数降低程度不同,这说明研究对象具有异质性。在为期一年的随访中,没有发现任何参数有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Male Sex With Worse Right Ventricular Function and Survival in Pulmonary Hypertension in the Redefining Pulmonary Hypertension Through Pulmonary Vascular Disease Phenomics Cohort Adapting the Tools of Our Trade Dynamic Digital Radiography Pulmonary Function Testing Annual Adherence of Asian American Individuals in a Lung Cancer Screening Program Compared With Other Racial Groups Strategies for the Management of a Pulmonary Function Laboratory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1