Variation in approach for midsize (4-6cm) ventral hernias across a statewide quality improvement collaborative

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Surgery in practice and science Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100235
Anne P. Ehlers , Alex K. Hallway , Sean M. O'Neill , Brian T. Fry , Ryan A. Howard , Jenny M. Shao , Michael J. Englesbe , Justin B Dimick , Dana A Telem , Grace J Kim
{"title":"Variation in approach for midsize (4-6cm) ventral hernias across a statewide quality improvement collaborative","authors":"Anne P. Ehlers ,&nbsp;Alex K. Hallway ,&nbsp;Sean M. O'Neill ,&nbsp;Brian T. Fry ,&nbsp;Ryan A. Howard ,&nbsp;Jenny M. Shao ,&nbsp;Michael J. Englesbe ,&nbsp;Justin B Dimick ,&nbsp;Dana A Telem ,&nbsp;Grace J Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Repair of midsize (4–6 cm) ventral hernias is challenging given lack of guidelines. Within this context, we sought to characterize surgical approach among patients undergoing repair of midsize ventral hernias within the only population-level, clinically-nuanced hernia registry in the US.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ventral hernia repair in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative Core Optimization Hernia Registry (MSQC<img>COHR). MSQC<img>COHR is the only US population-level registry that captures clinically-nuanced data pertaining to patient hernia characteristics. We included patients who underwent repair of a 4–6 cm hernia from January 1, 2020-June 30, 2022. We stratified repair type as open or minimally invasive and used a multivariable logistic regression model to identify factors associated with MIS approach. Secondary outcomes included complications rate.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 771 patients, mean hernia width (SD) was 4.7 cm (0.8) and 339 (44 %) underwent MIS approach. Patients with MIS approach had lower BMI (33.5 vs 34.8, <em>p</em> = 0.02) and less often were ASA class III (47.5% vs 54.6 %, <em>p</em> = 0.02) or ASA class IV (2.4% vs 4.2 %, <em>p</em> = 0.02). MIS approach was associated with smaller mean hernia width (4.71 cm vs 4.84 cm, <em>p</em> = 0.02) and was used more often in the elective setting (94.4% vs 84.0 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). In the multivariable logistic regression model, higher BMI (aOR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.94–0.99) and urgent/emergent surgery (aOR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.24–0.79) were associated with lower odds of MIS. We found no significant association between MIS and risk of complications (aOR 0.62, 95 % CI 0.37–1.04). Among patients undergoing MIS, more than half (<em>n</em> = 236, 69.6 %) had a robotic approach but there were few patient factors associated with this.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Among patients with midsize hernias, few patient-level factors are associated with approach. This may indicate that surgeon preference factors largely into this decision.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000020/pdfft?md5=61bbd733875b6999ed02afb740eb4712&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262024000020-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262024000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Repair of midsize (4–6 cm) ventral hernias is challenging given lack of guidelines. Within this context, we sought to characterize surgical approach among patients undergoing repair of midsize ventral hernias within the only population-level, clinically-nuanced hernia registry in the US.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ventral hernia repair in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative Core Optimization Hernia Registry (MSQCCOHR). MSQCCOHR is the only US population-level registry that captures clinically-nuanced data pertaining to patient hernia characteristics. We included patients who underwent repair of a 4–6 cm hernia from January 1, 2020-June 30, 2022. We stratified repair type as open or minimally invasive and used a multivariable logistic regression model to identify factors associated with MIS approach. Secondary outcomes included complications rate.

Results

Among 771 patients, mean hernia width (SD) was 4.7 cm (0.8) and 339 (44 %) underwent MIS approach. Patients with MIS approach had lower BMI (33.5 vs 34.8, p = 0.02) and less often were ASA class III (47.5% vs 54.6 %, p = 0.02) or ASA class IV (2.4% vs 4.2 %, p = 0.02). MIS approach was associated with smaller mean hernia width (4.71 cm vs 4.84 cm, p = 0.02) and was used more often in the elective setting (94.4% vs 84.0 %, p < 0.01). In the multivariable logistic regression model, higher BMI (aOR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.94–0.99) and urgent/emergent surgery (aOR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.24–0.79) were associated with lower odds of MIS. We found no significant association between MIS and risk of complications (aOR 0.62, 95 % CI 0.37–1.04). Among patients undergoing MIS, more than half (n = 236, 69.6 %) had a robotic approach but there were few patient factors associated with this.

Conclusion

Among patients with midsize hernias, few patient-level factors are associated with approach. This may indicate that surgeon preference factors largely into this decision.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全州质量改进合作组织在治疗中等大小(4-6 厘米)腹股沟疝气方法上的差异
导言:由于缺乏相关指南,中型(4-6 厘米)腹股沟疝的修补具有挑战性。在这种情况下,我们试图在美国唯一的人口级临床平衡疝气登记处对接受中型腹股沟疝修补术的患者的手术方法进行特征分析。方法对密歇根州外科质量协作核心优化疝气登记处(MSQCCOHR)中接受腹股沟疝修补术的患者进行回顾性队列研究。MSQCCOHR 是美国唯一的人口级注册机构,可获取与患者疝气特征相关的临床平衡数据。我们纳入了 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日期间接受 4-6 厘米疝修补术的患者。我们将修复类型分为开放式和微创式,并使用多变量逻辑回归模型确定与微创式方法相关的因素。结果771名患者中,疝的平均宽度(标清)为4.7厘米(0.8),339人(44%)接受了MIS方法。采用 MIS 方法的患者体重指数较低(33.5 vs 34.8,P = 0.02),ASA III 级(47.5% vs 54.6%,P = 0.02)或 ASA IV 级(2.4% vs 4.2%,P = 0.02)的患者较少。MIS 方法与疝的平均宽度较小(4.71 厘米 vs 4.84 厘米,p = 0.02)有关,且更多用于择期手术(94.4% vs 84.0%,p <0.01)。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,较高的体重指数(aOR 0.97,95 % CI 0.94-0.99)和紧急/急诊手术(aOR 0.43,95 % CI 0.24-0.79)与较低的 MIS 几率相关。我们发现 MIS 与并发症风险(aOR 0.62,95 % CI 0.37-1.04)之间无明显关联。在接受 MIS 的患者中,半数以上(n = 236,69.6%)采用了机器人手术方法,但与此相关的患者因素很少。结论在中型疝气患者中,患者层面的因素很少与手术方式相关,这可能表明外科医生的偏好在很大程度上影响了患者的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
期刊最新文献
Surgical sharp debridement alongside maggot debridement therapy (MDT) for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs): A systematic review of case reports. Is there an impact of surgeon's experience on in-hospital outcome in patients with operatively treated proximal humerus and humerus shaft fractures? The CRP/PAB ratio outperforms the LRINEC score in early diagnosis of Fournier's gangrene. Operating room times differ for surgical fixation of metacarpal fractures: An analysis of two principally different techniques. Higher compliance with the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol improves postoperative recovery and 6-month mortality in upper gastrointestinal surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1