P266 Predictive tissue-based biomarkers in treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease with biologicals and small molecules: a systematic review

A. Mookhoek, D. Sönmez, L. Kovacic, P. Juillerat, B. Misselwitz, H. Dawson
{"title":"P266 Predictive tissue-based biomarkers in treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease with biologicals and small molecules: a systematic review","authors":"A. Mookhoek, D. Sönmez, L. Kovacic, P. Juillerat, B. Misselwitz, H. Dawson","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The treatment landscape of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has changed in the past decade with introduction of new drug classes. For most drugs, only 30% of patients achieve long-term remission. Clinical implementation of predictive biomarkers to support precision medicine is lacking. As the interactions of immune system and microbiome in the colonic mucosa may hold the key to the prediction problem, we performed a systematic review to assess the status of tissue-based biomarkers in the era of biological and small molecule therapies.\n \n \n \n A literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of science and the ECCO abstract database in July 2023. Papers were considered eligible when reporting on biomarkers, extracted from biopsies obtained during colonoscopy, that had predictive value regarding therapy success of a specific non-TNFα biological or small molecule. Two authors independently assessed eligibility and extracted the data.\n \n \n \n From 10,141 screened records with 155 papers assessed for eligibility, a total of 43 studies were included. The majority was published in the last 5 years (87%). Data on the clinical history of patients and the interval between biopsy and therapy onset was often lacking, in part while 49% of studies were published as conference abstracts. Heterogeneity in therapy success assessment regarding modality (clinical, endoscopic, and/or histologic) and interval (4-58 weeks) was striking. With 28 studies, vedolizumab is the best investigated drug. Of the 16 studies reporting on gene expression, 7 used data from the GEMINI-I/LTS trials. These studies reported a range from a single predictive gene such as TREM1 and OSM to a classifier of 267 differentially expressed genes. Studies looking at the protein level (n=7) focused mostly on target engagement. In 7 studies, biomarker discovery was performed through histological evaluation, mainly looking at mucosal eosinophil counts. One study looking at the microbiome did not find differences between responders and non-responders of vedolizumab.\n \n \n \n Our systematic review shows that tissue-based predictive biomarker discovery in IBD is a young and dynamic field of research. This is reflected by the heterogeneity in how and when therapy success is assessed. Moreover, the various methods to analyze gene expression data yield vastly different results when applied to the same dataset. We therefore propose guideline development to support clinical implementation of predictive biomarkers.\n","PeriodicalId":15453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","volume":"23 92","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The treatment landscape of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has changed in the past decade with introduction of new drug classes. For most drugs, only 30% of patients achieve long-term remission. Clinical implementation of predictive biomarkers to support precision medicine is lacking. As the interactions of immune system and microbiome in the colonic mucosa may hold the key to the prediction problem, we performed a systematic review to assess the status of tissue-based biomarkers in the era of biological and small molecule therapies. A literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of science and the ECCO abstract database in July 2023. Papers were considered eligible when reporting on biomarkers, extracted from biopsies obtained during colonoscopy, that had predictive value regarding therapy success of a specific non-TNFα biological or small molecule. Two authors independently assessed eligibility and extracted the data. From 10,141 screened records with 155 papers assessed for eligibility, a total of 43 studies were included. The majority was published in the last 5 years (87%). Data on the clinical history of patients and the interval between biopsy and therapy onset was often lacking, in part while 49% of studies were published as conference abstracts. Heterogeneity in therapy success assessment regarding modality (clinical, endoscopic, and/or histologic) and interval (4-58 weeks) was striking. With 28 studies, vedolizumab is the best investigated drug. Of the 16 studies reporting on gene expression, 7 used data from the GEMINI-I/LTS trials. These studies reported a range from a single predictive gene such as TREM1 and OSM to a classifier of 267 differentially expressed genes. Studies looking at the protein level (n=7) focused mostly on target engagement. In 7 studies, biomarker discovery was performed through histological evaluation, mainly looking at mucosal eosinophil counts. One study looking at the microbiome did not find differences between responders and non-responders of vedolizumab. Our systematic review shows that tissue-based predictive biomarker discovery in IBD is a young and dynamic field of research. This is reflected by the heterogeneity in how and when therapy success is assessed. Moreover, the various methods to analyze gene expression data yield vastly different results when applied to the same dataset. We therefore propose guideline development to support clinical implementation of predictive biomarkers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P266 生物制剂和小分子药物治疗炎症性肠病的组织预测性生物标志物:系统综述
过去十年间,随着新药种类的引入,炎症性肠病(IBD)的治疗格局发生了变化。对于大多数药物而言,只有 30% 的患者能获得长期缓解。临床上缺乏支持精准医疗的预测性生物标志物。结肠粘膜中免疫系统和微生物组的相互作用可能是解决预测问题的关键,因此我们进行了一项系统性综述,以评估生物和小分子疗法时代基于组织的生物标志物的现状。 我们于 2023 年 7 月在 Medline、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of science 和 ECCO 摘要数据库中进行了文献检索。从结肠镜检查活检中提取的生物标记物对特定非TNFα生物制剂或小分子制剂的治疗成功率具有预测价值的论文被认为符合条件。两位作者独立评估了申请资格并提取了数据。 从 10,141 条筛选记录和 155 篇评估合格的论文中,共纳入了 43 项研究。大部分研究发表于最近 5 年(87%)。由于49%的研究是以会议摘要的形式发表的,因此往往缺乏有关患者临床病史以及活组织检查和开始治疗之间间隔时间的数据。在治疗成功率评估方面,有关模式(临床、内窥镜和/或组织学)和间隔时间(4-58 周)的异质性非常明显。在28项研究中,维多珠单抗是研究最多的药物。在报告基因表达的 16 项研究中,有 7 项使用了来自 GEMINI-I/LTS 试验的数据。这些研究报告的范围从 TREM1 和 OSM 等单一预测基因到 267 个差异表达基因的分类器。针对蛋白质水平的研究(7 项)主要侧重于靶点参与。在 7 项研究中,生物标志物的发现是通过组织学评估进行的,主要是观察粘膜嗜酸性粒细胞计数。一项观察微生物组的研究没有发现维多珠单抗应答者和非应答者之间的差异。 我们的系统综述显示,基于组织的 IBD 预测性生物标记物发现是一个年轻而充满活力的研究领域。这体现在评估治疗成功的方式和时间存在差异。此外,各种分析基因表达数据的方法在应用于同一数据集时产生的结果也大相径庭。因此,我们建议制定指南,以支持预测性生物标记物的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prolonged time to diagnosis of Crohn’s disease in patients with perianal fistulas negatively affects long-term outcomes Oxidized polyunsaturated fatty acid promotes colitis and colitis-associated tumorigenesis in mice Prevalence, characteristics, management, and outcomes of difficult-to-treat inflammatory bowel disease IL23R-specific CAR Tregs for the treatment of Crohn’s disease Colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: a review of the role of gut microbiota and bacterial biofilms in disease pathogenesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1