Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors Related to EMs Correlation in Ovarian Cancer Patients.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Alternative therapies in health and medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01
Qiaomei Zheng, Shaozhan Chen, Lihong Chen, Jinhua Wang
{"title":"Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors Related to EMs Correlation in Ovarian Cancer Patients.","authors":"Qiaomei Zheng, Shaozhan Chen, Lihong Chen, Jinhua Wang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in patients with endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 135 ovarian cancer patients admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to January 2018. Based on the presence of concomitant endometriosis (EMs), the patients were divided into two groups: the Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer (EAOC) group (n=64) and the non-EAOC (NEAOC) group (n=71). We compared the clinical characteristics of the two groups. Additionally, in the EAOC group, we followed up with patients for 5 years, categorized them into the survival group (n=40) and the deceased group (n=24) based on their prognosis, and conducted univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison to the NEAOC group, patients in the EAOC group exhibited higher rates of menopause occurrence, pathological stages I-II, vaginal bleeding, and history of cesarean section, with statistical significance (P < .05). They also had a lower incidence of dysmenorrhea, lymph node metastasis, and abdominal distension, as well as an earlier age of onset, all of which were statistically significant (P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences (P > .05) between the two groups in terms of parity, gravidity, tumor diameter, abdominal pain incidence, and body mass index. Based on prognosis, the patients were categorized into a survival group (n=40) and a deceased group (n=24). Comparison between the two groups showed statistically significant differences (P < .05) in terms of postoperative residue, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and lymph node metastasis. In contrast, there were no statistically significant differences (P > .05) in terms of tumor laterality, histological type, tumor stage, differentiation degree, and vaginal bleeding. The variables with P < .05 were assigned as independent variables, with the prognosis of death as the dependent variable. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that epithelial-mesenchymal transition and lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors for mortality in EAOC patients (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical characteristics of EAOC patients show significant differences, with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and lymph node metastasis being identified as independent adverse prognostic factors associated with poor outcomes in EAOC patients. However, this study has limitations such as a relatively small sample size, and further research is therefore necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in patients with endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer.

Methods: In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 135 ovarian cancer patients admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to January 2018. Based on the presence of concomitant endometriosis (EMs), the patients were divided into two groups: the Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer (EAOC) group (n=64) and the non-EAOC (NEAOC) group (n=71). We compared the clinical characteristics of the two groups. Additionally, in the EAOC group, we followed up with patients for 5 years, categorized them into the survival group (n=40) and the deceased group (n=24) based on their prognosis, and conducted univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify influencing factors.

Results: In comparison to the NEAOC group, patients in the EAOC group exhibited higher rates of menopause occurrence, pathological stages I-II, vaginal bleeding, and history of cesarean section, with statistical significance (P < .05). They also had a lower incidence of dysmenorrhea, lymph node metastasis, and abdominal distension, as well as an earlier age of onset, all of which were statistically significant (P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences (P > .05) between the two groups in terms of parity, gravidity, tumor diameter, abdominal pain incidence, and body mass index. Based on prognosis, the patients were categorized into a survival group (n=40) and a deceased group (n=24). Comparison between the two groups showed statistically significant differences (P < .05) in terms of postoperative residue, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and lymph node metastasis. In contrast, there were no statistically significant differences (P > .05) in terms of tumor laterality, histological type, tumor stage, differentiation degree, and vaginal bleeding. The variables with P < .05 were assigned as independent variables, with the prognosis of death as the dependent variable. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that epithelial-mesenchymal transition and lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors for mortality in EAOC patients (P < .05).

Conclusion: Clinical characteristics of EAOC patients show significant differences, with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and lymph node metastasis being identified as independent adverse prognostic factors associated with poor outcomes in EAOC patients. However, this study has limitations such as a relatively small sample size, and further research is therefore necessary.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卵巢癌患者的临床特征及与EMs相关的预后因素分析
目的:探讨子宫内膜异位症相关卵巢癌患者的临床特征和预后因素:研究子宫内膜异位症相关卵巢癌患者的临床特征和预后因素:在这项研究中,我们回顾性分析了我院自 2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月收治的 135 例卵巢癌患者的病历。根据是否合并子宫内膜异位症(EMs),将患者分为两组:子宫内膜异位症相关卵巢癌(EAOC)组(n=64)和非EAOC(NEAOC)组(n=71)。我们比较了两组患者的临床特征。此外,我们对EAOC组患者进行了为期5年的随访,根据预后情况将其分为生存组(40人)和死亡组(24人),并进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定影响因素:与 NEAOC 组相比,EAOC 组患者绝经、病理分期 I-II 期、阴道出血和剖宫产史的发生率更高,差异有统计学意义(P < .05)。他们的痛经、淋巴结转移和腹胀发生率也较低,发病年龄也较早,这些差异均有统计学意义(P < .05)。两组患者在胎次、孕期、肿瘤直径、腹痛发生率和体重指数方面的差异无统计学意义(P > .05)。根据预后,患者被分为生存组(40 人)和死亡组(24 人)。两组患者在术后残留物、上皮-间质转化和淋巴结转移方面的差异有统计学意义(P < .05)。相比之下,两组患者在肿瘤侧位、组织学类型、肿瘤分期、分化程度和阴道出血方面的差异无统计学意义(P > .05)。P<0.05的变量被定为自变量,死亡预后为因变量。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,上皮-间质转化和淋巴结转移是EAOC患者死亡的独立危险因素(P < .05):结论:EAOC患者的临床特征显示出显著差异,上皮-间质转化和淋巴结转移是与EAOC患者不良预后相关的独立不良预后因素。然而,这项研究存在样本量相对较小等局限性,因此有必要开展进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alternative therapies in health and medicine
Alternative therapies in health and medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.
期刊最新文献
Complete Resolution of Plantar Psoriasis With Ayurveda, A Case Report. Humor and Laughter in Health Promotion Interventions and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Disciplinary Narrative Review. Low Concentrations of Wyethia Helenioides-derived Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory Against Allergic Rhinitis. The Effects of Fisetin on Reducing Biological Aging: A Pilot Study. Circular RNA Pum_0014 Targets miR-146a-5p/NF2 Axis to Regulate VEGF/PAK1 Pathway and Reduce H2O2-induced Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1