Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide and Dapagliflozin on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism and Insulin Function in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Alternative therapies in health and medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01
Jie Ma, Jingzhi Fu, Ningning Guo, Zhongchao Liu
{"title":"Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide and Dapagliflozin on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism and Insulin Function in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.","authors":"Jie Ma, Jingzhi Fu, Ningning Guo, Zhongchao Liu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Observe the changes in clinical indicators of patients with early diabetic nephropathy treated with liraglutide or dapagliflozin, evaluate their clinical efficacy, and provide new ideas for the treatment of diabetic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, from January 2020 to January 2022, a total of 120 patients with early-stage type 2 diabetic nephropathy who met the inclusion criteria were selected. According to the order of treatment, the patients were randomly divided into traditional group, liraglutide group and dapagliflozin group, with 40 cases in each group. All patients continued their previous conventional hypoglycemic treatment, and the traditional group did not need to adjust the treatment plan; the liraglutide group: added liraglutide (average dose was 1.2 mg daily); the dapagliflozin group: added dapagliflozin (average dose was 10 mg daily). At the same time, all patients received dietary guidance and appropriate exercise intervention for a total of 12 weeks. The changes in blood sugar, blood lipids, pancreatic islet function, liver function, weight, body mass index (BMI) and other indicators before and after treatment were compared, and the adverse reactions that occurred during the medication of the three groups of patients were recorded. Standard doses of liraglutide and dapagliflozin were used in the treatment groups, 0.6 mg daily and 10 mg daily, respectively. These standard doses have been shown to be effective in a wide range of clinical practices and were therefore chosen in this study to ensure consistency and comparability. This helps readers better understand the study methods and results to evaluate these specific dosing options.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to treatment, there were no significant differences in the general data and indicators among the three groups, including FPG, 2hPG, HbA1c, TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, ALT, AST, HOMA-IR, FINS, and HOMA-β (all P > .05). In the conventional group, significant changes were observed in FPG, 2hPG, HbA1c, body weight, BMI, HDL-C, LDL-C, ALT, AST, HOMA-IR, FINS, and HOMA-β compared to the pre-treatment period, and these differences were statistically significant (all P < .05).Both the liraglutide and dagliflozin groups exhibited significant changes in FPG, 2hPG, HbA1c, TC, TG, LDL-C, HOMA-IR, FINS, HOMA-β, body weight, BMI, HDL-C, ALT, and AST when compared to the post-treatment period, and these changes were statistically significant (all P < .05). Post-treatment analysis revealed that in terms of blood glucose, FPG, 2hPG, and HbA1c decreased more significantly in the liraglutide and dagliflozin groups compared to the conventional group (all P < .05). Regarding lipids, TC, TG, and LDL-C decreased more significantly in the liraglutide and dagliflozin groups compared to the conventional group (all P < .05). For pancreatic islet function, HOMA-IR and HOMA-β decreased more significantly compared to the conventional group (all P < .05). Weight and BMI decreased more significantly in the liraglutide and dagliflozin groups compared to the conventional group (all P < .05). However, there were no significant differences in hepatic function among the three groups after treatment.Post-treatment comparisons between the liraglutide and dagliflozin groups revealed significant differences in FPG, HbA1c, body weight, and BMI (all P < .05). No adverse events occurred during the treatment period in any of the three groups, and there were no reported deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of liraglutide or dagliflozin to conventional hypoglycaemic drug therapy in early diabetic patients can not only bring blood glucose to a safe and faster standard, but also regulate blood lipids and glucose, and the therapeutic effect of liraglutide is obvious than that of dagliflozin in terms of blood glucose regulation. Study limitations include small sample size, short study duration, unspecified exclusion criteria, unclear randomization method, and the impact of patient compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Observe the changes in clinical indicators of patients with early diabetic nephropathy treated with liraglutide or dapagliflozin, evaluate their clinical efficacy, and provide new ideas for the treatment of diabetic patients.

Methods: In this study, from January 2020 to January 2022, a total of 120 patients with early-stage type 2 diabetic nephropathy who met the inclusion criteria were selected. According to the order of treatment, the patients were randomly divided into traditional group, liraglutide group and dapagliflozin group, with 40 cases in each group. All patients continued their previous conventional hypoglycemic treatment, and the traditional group did not need to adjust the treatment plan; the liraglutide group: added liraglutide (average dose was 1.2 mg daily); the dapagliflozin group: added dapagliflozin (average dose was 10 mg daily). At the same time, all patients received dietary guidance and appropriate exercise intervention for a total of 12 weeks. The changes in blood sugar, blood lipids, pancreatic islet function, liver function, weight, body mass index (BMI) and other indicators before and after treatment were compared, and the adverse reactions that occurred during the medication of the three groups of patients were recorded. Standard doses of liraglutide and dapagliflozin were used in the treatment groups, 0.6 mg daily and 10 mg daily, respectively. These standard doses have been shown to be effective in a wide range of clinical practices and were therefore chosen in this study to ensure consistency and comparability. This helps readers better understand the study methods and results to evaluate these specific dosing options.

Results: Prior to treatment, there were no significant differences in the general data and indicators among the three groups, including FPG, 2hPG, HbA1c, TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, ALT, AST, HOMA-IR, FINS, and HOMA-β (all P > .05). In the conventional group, significant changes were observed in FPG, 2hPG, HbA1c, body weight, BMI, HDL-C, LDL-C, ALT, AST, HOMA-IR, FINS, and HOMA-β compared to the pre-treatment period, and these differences were statistically significant (all P < .05).Both the liraglutide and dagliflozin groups exhibited significant changes in FPG, 2hPG, HbA1c, TC, TG, LDL-C, HOMA-IR, FINS, HOMA-β, body weight, BMI, HDL-C, ALT, and AST when compared to the post-treatment period, and these changes were statistically significant (all P < .05). Post-treatment analysis revealed that in terms of blood glucose, FPG, 2hPG, and HbA1c decreased more significantly in the liraglutide and dagliflozin groups compared to the conventional group (all P < .05). Regarding lipids, TC, TG, and LDL-C decreased more significantly in the liraglutide and dagliflozin groups compared to the conventional group (all P < .05). For pancreatic islet function, HOMA-IR and HOMA-β decreased more significantly compared to the conventional group (all P < .05). Weight and BMI decreased more significantly in the liraglutide and dagliflozin groups compared to the conventional group (all P < .05). However, there were no significant differences in hepatic function among the three groups after treatment.Post-treatment comparisons between the liraglutide and dagliflozin groups revealed significant differences in FPG, HbA1c, body weight, and BMI (all P < .05). No adverse events occurred during the treatment period in any of the three groups, and there were no reported deaths.

Conclusion: The addition of liraglutide or dagliflozin to conventional hypoglycaemic drug therapy in early diabetic patients can not only bring blood glucose to a safe and faster standard, but also regulate blood lipids and glucose, and the therapeutic effect of liraglutide is obvious than that of dagliflozin in terms of blood glucose regulation. Study limitations include small sample size, short study duration, unspecified exclusion criteria, unclear randomization method, and the impact of patient compliance.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利拉鲁肽和达帕格列非洛嗪对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖、血脂代谢和胰岛素功能的临床疗效和安全性。
目的观察利拉鲁肽或达帕格列净治疗早期糖尿病肾病患者的临床指标变化,评价其临床疗效,为糖尿病患者的治疗提供新思路:本研究自2020年1月至2022年1月,共选取120例符合纳入标准的早期2型糖尿病肾病患者。按照治疗顺序,将患者随机分为传统组、利拉鲁肽组和达帕格列净组,每组40例。所有患者均继续之前的常规降糖治疗,传统组无需调整治疗方案;利拉鲁肽组:加用利拉鲁肽(平均剂量为每天1.2毫克);达帕格列净组:加用达帕格列净(平均剂量为每天10毫克)。与此同时,所有患者都接受了为期 12 周的饮食指导和适当的运动干预。比较治疗前后血糖、血脂、胰岛功能、肝功能、体重、体重指数(BMI)等指标的变化,并记录三组患者用药期间出现的不良反应。治疗组采用标准剂量的利拉鲁肽和达帕格列净,分别为每天0.6毫克和每天10毫克。这些标准剂量已在多种临床实践中证明有效,因此本研究选择了这些剂量,以确保一致性和可比性。这有助于读者更好地理解评估这些特定剂量选择的研究方法和结果:治疗前,三组患者的一般数据和指标无显著差异,包括 FPG、2hPG、HbA1c、TC、TG、HDL-C、LDL-C、ALT、AST、HOMA-IR、FINS 和 HOMA-β(所有 P > .05)。在常规组中,与治疗前相比,FPG、2hPG、HbA1c、体重、BMI、HDL-C、LDL-C、ALT、AST、HOMA-IR、FINS 和 HOMA-β 均发生了显著变化,且这些差异具有统计学意义(所有 P 均小于 0.05)。与治疗后相比,利拉鲁肽组和达格列净组的 FPG、2hPG、HbA1c、TC、TG、LDL-C、HOMA-IR、FINS、HOMA-β、体重、BMI、HDL-C、ALT 和 AST 均有显著变化,且这些变化均有统计学意义(均 P < .05)。治疗后分析显示,在血糖方面,利拉鲁肽组和达格列净组的FPG、2hPG和HbA1c与常规组相比下降更明显(均P < .05)。在血脂方面,与常规组相比,利拉鲁肽组和达格列净组的 TC、TG 和 LDL-C 下降更明显(均 P < .05)。在胰岛功能方面,与常规组相比,HOMA-IR 和 HOMA-β 下降更明显(均 P < .05)。与常规组相比,利拉鲁肽组和达格列净组的体重和体重指数下降更明显(均为 P < .05)。利拉鲁肽组和达格列净组治疗后的比较显示,FPG、HbA1c、体重和 BMI 均有显著差异(均 P < .05)。三组患者在治疗期间均未发生不良反应,也没有死亡报告:结论:早期糖尿病患者在常规降糖药物治疗的基础上加用利拉鲁肽或达格列净,不仅能使血糖安全快速达标,还能调节血脂和血糖,且在血糖调节方面,利拉鲁肽的疗效明显优于达格列净。研究局限性包括样本量小、研究时间短、未明确排除标准、随机方法不明确以及患者依从性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alternative therapies in health and medicine
Alternative therapies in health and medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.
期刊最新文献
Complete Resolution of Plantar Psoriasis With Ayurveda, A Case Report. Humor and Laughter in Health Promotion Interventions and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Disciplinary Narrative Review. Low Concentrations of Wyethia Helenioides-derived Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory Against Allergic Rhinitis. The Effects of Fisetin on Reducing Biological Aging: A Pilot Study. Circular RNA Pum_0014 Targets miR-146a-5p/NF2 Axis to Regulate VEGF/PAK1 Pathway and Reduce H2O2-induced Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1