Predictive Value of the Duke Anesthesia Resistance Scale in Postoperative Delirium among Elderly Patients with Hip Fractures.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Alternative therapies in health and medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01
Zhen Lei, Ling Zhang, Jingjing Yang, Li Ye, Linzhi Xia
{"title":"Predictive Value of the Duke Anesthesia Resistance Scale in Postoperative Delirium among Elderly Patients with Hip Fractures.","authors":"Zhen Lei, Ling Zhang, Jingjing Yang, Li Ye, Linzhi Xia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of the Duke Anesthesia Resistance Scale (DARS) for postoperative delirium in elderly patients following hip fracture surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 90 elderly patients with hip fractures who underwent surgical treatment from January 2018 to January 2021. Patients were categorized into delirium (n=22) and non-delirium (n=68) groups based on postoperative delirium occurrence. Qualitative and quantitative variables were compared between the groups to identify primary risk factors for postoperative delirium. The ability of DARS to predict postoperative delirium was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in age, number of underlying diseases, surgical blood loss, and DARS scores were observed between the delirium and non-delirium groups (P < .05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that DARS scores (OR=2.321), age (OR=2.476), number of underlying diseases (OR=2.209), surgical blood loss (OR=2.267), and postoperative pain (OR=2.287) were significant predictors of postoperative delirium (P < .05). Pearson correlation analysis revealed a negative correlation between DARS scores and age, number of underlying diseases, and surgical blood loss (P < .05). The ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the area under the curve (AUC) for DARS in predicting postoperative delirium was 0.8255 (95% CI: 0.726~0.924). At a DARS cutoff score of 38, the specificity was 80.28%, and the sensitivity was 81.45%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DARS score is a valuable tool for predicting postoperative delirium in elderly patients with hip fractures, with an optimal threshold of 38 points. The use of DARS in predicting postoperative delirium could significantly benefit healthcare providers and improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of the Duke Anesthesia Resistance Scale (DARS) for postoperative delirium in elderly patients following hip fracture surgery.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 90 elderly patients with hip fractures who underwent surgical treatment from January 2018 to January 2021. Patients were categorized into delirium (n=22) and non-delirium (n=68) groups based on postoperative delirium occurrence. Qualitative and quantitative variables were compared between the groups to identify primary risk factors for postoperative delirium. The ability of DARS to predict postoperative delirium was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results: Significant differences in age, number of underlying diseases, surgical blood loss, and DARS scores were observed between the delirium and non-delirium groups (P < .05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that DARS scores (OR=2.321), age (OR=2.476), number of underlying diseases (OR=2.209), surgical blood loss (OR=2.267), and postoperative pain (OR=2.287) were significant predictors of postoperative delirium (P < .05). Pearson correlation analysis revealed a negative correlation between DARS scores and age, number of underlying diseases, and surgical blood loss (P < .05). The ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the area under the curve (AUC) for DARS in predicting postoperative delirium was 0.8255 (95% CI: 0.726~0.924). At a DARS cutoff score of 38, the specificity was 80.28%, and the sensitivity was 81.45%.

Conclusion: The DARS score is a valuable tool for predicting postoperative delirium in elderly patients with hip fractures, with an optimal threshold of 38 points. The use of DARS in predicting postoperative delirium could significantly benefit healthcare providers and improve patient care.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
杜克麻醉阻力量表对老年髋部骨折患者术后谵妄的预测价值
研究目的本研究旨在探讨杜克麻醉阻力量表(DARS)对老年髋部骨折手术患者术后谵妄的预测价值:对2018年1月至2021年1月期间接受手术治疗的90例老年髋部骨折患者进行回顾性研究。根据术后谵妄发生情况将患者分为谵妄组(22 人)和非谵妄组(68 人)。比较两组之间的定性和定量变量,以确定术后谵妄的主要风险因素。使用接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)评估了 DARS 预测术后谵妄的能力:谵妄组和非谵妄组在年龄、基础疾病数量、手术失血量和 DARS 评分方面存在显著差异(P < .05)。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,DARS 评分(OR=2.321)、年龄(OR=2.476)、基础疾病数量(OR=2.209)、手术失血量(OR=2.267)和术后疼痛(OR=2.287)是术后谵妄的重要预测因素(P < .05)。皮尔逊相关分析显示,DARS 评分与年龄、基础疾病数量和手术失血量呈负相关(P < .05)。ROC 曲线分析显示,DARS 预测术后谵妄的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.8255(95% CI:0.726~0.924)。当 DARS 临界值为 38 时,特异性为 80.28%,灵敏度为 81.45%:DARS 评分是预测老年髋部骨折患者术后谵妄的重要工具,最佳临界值为 38 分。使用 DARS 预测术后谵妄可使医护人员受益匪浅,并改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alternative therapies in health and medicine
Alternative therapies in health and medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.
期刊最新文献
Complete Resolution of Plantar Psoriasis With Ayurveda, A Case Report. Humor and Laughter in Health Promotion Interventions and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Disciplinary Narrative Review. Low Concentrations of Wyethia Helenioides-derived Flavonoids as Anti-Inflammatory Against Allergic Rhinitis. The Effects of Fisetin on Reducing Biological Aging: A Pilot Study. Circular RNA Pum_0014 Targets miR-146a-5p/NF2 Axis to Regulate VEGF/PAK1 Pathway and Reduce H2O2-induced Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1