Clinical utility of i-gel® and BlockBuster™ supraglottic devices for airway management in postburn injury contracture neck patients under general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.

Abstract

Background: Post burn injury contracture (PBC) neck patients pose a unique challenge for the anesthesiologists. The use of supraglottic device (SGDs) for managing such patients is being increasingly used. We compared i-gel^® and LMA BlockBuster™ in PBC adult patients under general anesthesia (GA).

Methods: The study included 63 subjects with mild/moderate PBC neck of either sex with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I and II under GA. Patients with intraoral pathology, mouth opening <2.5 cm, and severe contracture were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned to i-gel^® (I) and BlockBuster™ (B) groups. The primary objective of the study was the time for successful insertion. First attempt success rate, oropharyngeal leak pressures (OLP), and complications were also assessed.

Results: Mean insertion time was significantly less in Group I as compared to Group B (17.35 ± 1.43 vs. 21.32 ± 1.10 s; P < 0.001), OLP in Group B was significantly higher as compared to Group I (34.03 ± 1.33 vs. 25.23 ± 3.04 cm of H₂O; P < 0.001). Group I was found to be statistically easier to insert as compared to Group B (P = 0.011) with reduced requirement of airway maneuvering to insert the device (P = 0.017). Groups were similar in terms of complications.

Conclusion: SGDs are attractive option for airway management in mild/moderate degree of PBC neck. i-gel^® having shorter insertion time with easier insertion can be favorable at times of emergency while use of LMA BlockBuster™ can be preferred to reduce the risk of aspiration owing to higher OLP.