Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for previously treated MSI-H/dMMR solid tumours in the UK.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2024.2311507
Grant McCarthy, Kate Young, Matthew Madin-Warburton, Tyler Mantaian, Elizabeth Brook, Kaylie Metcalfe, Jan Mikelson, Ruifeng Xu, Carl Seyla-Hammer, Raquel Aguiar-Ibáñez, Mayur Amonkar
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for previously treated MSI-H/dMMR solid tumours in the UK.","authors":"Grant McCarthy, Kate Young, Matthew Madin-Warburton, Tyler Mantaian, Elizabeth Brook, Kaylie Metcalfe, Jan Mikelson, Ruifeng Xu, Carl Seyla-Hammer, Raquel Aguiar-Ibáñez, Mayur Amonkar","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2311507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients with previously treated microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumours have limited chemotherapeutic treatment options. Pembrolizumab received approval from the EMA in 2022 for the treatment of colorectal, endometrial, gastric, small intestine, and biliary MSI-H/dMMR tumour types. This approval was supported by data from the KEYNOTE-164 and KEYNOTE-158 clinical trials. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab compared with standard of care (SoC) for previously treated MSI-H/dMMR solid tumours in line with the approved EMA label from a UK healthcare payer perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-tumour partitioned survival model was built consisting of pre-progression, progressed disease, and dead health states. Pembrolizumab survival outcomes were extrapolated using Bayesian hierarchical models (BHMs) fitted to pooled data from KEYNOTE-164 and KEYNOTE-158. Comparator outcomes were informed by published sources. Tumour sites were modelled independently and then combined, weighted by tumour site distribution. A SoC comparator was used to formulate the overall cost-effectiveness result with pembrolizumab as the intervention. SoC comprised a weighted average of the comparators by tumour site based on market share. Drug acquisition, administration, adverse events, monitoring, subsequent treatment, end-of-life costs, and testing costs were included. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed, including modelling pembrolizumab efficacy using standard parametric survival models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pembrolizumab, at list price, was associated with £129,469 in total costs, 8.30 LYs, and 3.88 QALYs across the pooled tumour sites. SoC was associated with £28,222 in total costs, 1.14 LYs, and 0.72 QALYs across the pooled tumour sites. This yields an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £32,085 per QALY. Results were robust to sensitivity and scenario analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This model demonstrates pembrolizumab provides a valuable new alternative therapy for UK patients with MSH-H/dMMR cancer at the cost of £32,085 per QALY, with confidential discounts anticipated to improve cost-effectiveness further.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"279-291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2311507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with previously treated microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumours have limited chemotherapeutic treatment options. Pembrolizumab received approval from the EMA in 2022 for the treatment of colorectal, endometrial, gastric, small intestine, and biliary MSI-H/dMMR tumour types. This approval was supported by data from the KEYNOTE-164 and KEYNOTE-158 clinical trials. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab compared with standard of care (SoC) for previously treated MSI-H/dMMR solid tumours in line with the approved EMA label from a UK healthcare payer perspective.

Methods: A multi-tumour partitioned survival model was built consisting of pre-progression, progressed disease, and dead health states. Pembrolizumab survival outcomes were extrapolated using Bayesian hierarchical models (BHMs) fitted to pooled data from KEYNOTE-164 and KEYNOTE-158. Comparator outcomes were informed by published sources. Tumour sites were modelled independently and then combined, weighted by tumour site distribution. A SoC comparator was used to formulate the overall cost-effectiveness result with pembrolizumab as the intervention. SoC comprised a weighted average of the comparators by tumour site based on market share. Drug acquisition, administration, adverse events, monitoring, subsequent treatment, end-of-life costs, and testing costs were included. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed, including modelling pembrolizumab efficacy using standard parametric survival models.

Results: Pembrolizumab, at list price, was associated with £129,469 in total costs, 8.30 LYs, and 3.88 QALYs across the pooled tumour sites. SoC was associated with £28,222 in total costs, 1.14 LYs, and 0.72 QALYs across the pooled tumour sites. This yields an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £32,085 per QALY. Results were robust to sensitivity and scenario analyses.

Conclusions: This model demonstrates pembrolizumab provides a valuable new alternative therapy for UK patients with MSH-H/dMMR cancer at the cost of £32,085 per QALY, with confidential discounts anticipated to improve cost-effectiveness further.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在英国,pembrolizumab 治疗既往接受过治疗的 MSI-H/dMMR 实体瘤的成本效益。
研究目的曾接受过治疗的微卫星不稳定性高(MSI-H)/错配修复缺陷(dMMR)肿瘤患者的化疗选择有限。Pembrolizumab 于 2022 年获得欧洲医学管理局(EMA)批准,用于治疗结直肠、子宫内膜、胃、小肠和胆道 MSI-H/dMMR 肿瘤类型。本研究从英国医疗支付方的角度评估了与标准疗法(SoC)相比,pembrolizumab治疗既往接受过治疗的MSI-H/dMMR实体瘤的成本效益:方法:建立了一个多肿瘤分区生存模型,包括疾病进展前、进展期和死亡健康状态。使用贝叶斯分层模型(BHMs)推断Pembrolizumab的生存结果,该模型与KEYNOTE-164和KEYNOTE-158的汇总数据相匹配。对照组结果参考了已发表的资料。肿瘤部位独立建模,然后根据肿瘤部位分布加权合并。使用SoC比较指标来计算以pembrolizumab为干预措施的总体成本效益结果。SoC包括根据市场份额按肿瘤部位加权平均的参照物。包括药物购买、管理、不良事件、监测、后续治疗、生命终期成本和检测成本。进行了敏感性分析和情景分析,包括使用标准参数生存模型对 Pembrolizumab 的疗效进行建模:按上市价格计算,Pembrolizumab 的总成本为 129,469 英镑,总生存年数为 8.30 年,总 QALY 为 3.88 年。SoC与总成本28,222英镑、1.14 LYs和0.72 QALYs相关,适用于所有肿瘤部位。由此得出每 QALY 的增量成本效益比 (ICER) 为 32,085 英镑。结果对敏感性分析和情景分析都是稳健的:该模型表明,pembrolizumab为英国MSH-H/dMMR癌症患者提供了一种有价值的新替代疗法,每QALY成本为32085英镑,预计保密折扣将进一步提高成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
期刊最新文献
The burden of venous thromboembolism in ten countries: a cost-of-illness Markov model on surgical and ICU patients. The impact of KRAS mutational status on patient-reported outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a cross sectional study in France and Germany. The indirect costs of five cancers in Egypt: years of life lost and productivity costs. Healthcare resource utilization and costs among treatment-naïve people with HIV in state Medicaids: analysis of multi-tablet vs. single-tablet antiretroviral regimen initiators with and without concurrent mental health disorders. Cost-utility analysis of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1