Effectiveness and predictors of group cognitive behaviour therapy outcome for generalised anxiety disorder in an out-patient hospital setting.

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1017/S1352465823000632
B L Malivoire, K E Stewart, D Cameron, K Rowa, R E McCabe
{"title":"Effectiveness and predictors of group cognitive behaviour therapy outcome for generalised anxiety disorder in an out-patient hospital setting.","authors":"B L Malivoire, K E Stewart, D Cameron, K Rowa, R E McCabe","doi":"10.1017/S1352465823000632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is an empirically supported treatment for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Little is known about the effectiveness of CBT for GAD in real-world treatment settings.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigated the effectiveness of group CBT and predictors of treatment response in an out-patient hospital clinic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 386) with GAD participated in 12 sessions of group CBT at an out-patient clinic. Of those who provided at least partial data (<i>n</i> = 326), 84.5% completed treatment. Most questionnaires were completed at pre- and post-treatment; worry severity was assessed weekly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group CBT led to improvements in chronic worry (<i>d =</i> -0.91, <i>n =</i> 118), depressive symptoms (<i>d =</i> -1.22, <i>n</i> = 172), GAD symptom severity (<i>d</i> = -0.65, <i>n</i> = 171), intolerance of uncertainty (IU; <i>d =</i> -0.46, <i>n =</i> 174) and level of functional impairment (<i>d =</i> -0.35, <i>n =</i> 169). Greater pre-treatment GAD symptom severity (<i>d</i> = -0.17, <i>n</i> = 293), chronic worry (<i>d</i> = -0.20, <i>n</i> = 185), functional impairment (<i>d</i> = -0.12, <i>n</i> = 292), and number of comorbid diagnoses (<i>d</i> = -0.13, <i>n =</i> 299) predicted greater improvement in past week worry over treatment. Biological sex, age, depression symptom severity, number of treatment sessions attended, and IU did not predict change in past week worry over time.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings provide support for the effectiveness of group CBT for GAD and suggest the outcomes are robust and are either not impacted or are slightly positively impacted by several demographic and clinical factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":47936,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465823000632","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is an empirically supported treatment for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Little is known about the effectiveness of CBT for GAD in real-world treatment settings.

Aim: This study investigated the effectiveness of group CBT and predictors of treatment response in an out-patient hospital clinic.

Method: Participants (n = 386) with GAD participated in 12 sessions of group CBT at an out-patient clinic. Of those who provided at least partial data (n = 326), 84.5% completed treatment. Most questionnaires were completed at pre- and post-treatment; worry severity was assessed weekly.

Results: Group CBT led to improvements in chronic worry (d = -0.91, n = 118), depressive symptoms (d = -1.22, n = 172), GAD symptom severity (d = -0.65, n = 171), intolerance of uncertainty (IU; d = -0.46, n = 174) and level of functional impairment (d = -0.35, n = 169). Greater pre-treatment GAD symptom severity (d = -0.17, n = 293), chronic worry (d = -0.20, n = 185), functional impairment (d = -0.12, n = 292), and number of comorbid diagnoses (d = -0.13, n = 299) predicted greater improvement in past week worry over treatment. Biological sex, age, depression symptom severity, number of treatment sessions attended, and IU did not predict change in past week worry over time.

Discussion: These findings provide support for the effectiveness of group CBT for GAD and suggest the outcomes are robust and are either not impacted or are slightly positively impacted by several demographic and clinical factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在医院门诊环境中对广泛性焦虑症进行集体认知行为治疗的效果和预测因素。
背景:认知行为疗法(CBT认知行为疗法(CBT)是一种得到经验支持的治疗广泛性焦虑症(GAD)的方法。本研究调查了医院门诊中团体 CBT 的有效性以及治疗反应的预测因素:方法:患有 GAD 的参与者(n = 386)在门诊诊所参加了 12 个疗程的团体 CBT。在至少提供了部分数据的参与者(n = 326)中,84.5%完成了治疗。大多数调查问卷都是在治疗前和治疗后完成的;担心的严重程度每周评估一次:小组 CBT 改善了慢性担忧(d = -0.91,n = 118)、抑郁症状(d = -1.22,n = 172)、GAD 症状严重程度(d = -0.65,n = 171)、不确定性不容忍(IU;d = -0.46,n = 174)和功能障碍程度(d = -0.35,n = 169)。治疗前 GAD 症状严重程度(d = -0.17,n = 293)、长期担忧(d = -0.20,n = 185)、功能障碍(d = -0.12,n = 292)和合并诊断数量(d = -0.13,n = 299)越大,预示治疗后过去一周担忧的改善程度越大。生物性别、年龄、抑郁症状严重程度、接受治疗的疗程数和 IU 并不能预测过去一周担忧情绪随时间的变化:讨论:这些研究结果证明了小组 CBT 治疗严重抑郁强迫症的有效性,并表明其结果是可靠的,不会受到一些人口统计学和临床因素的影响,或者会受到轻微的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal aimed primarily at members of the helping and teaching professions. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy features original research papers, covering both experimental and clinical work, that contribute to the theory, practice and evolution of cognitive and behaviour therapy. The journal aims to reflect and influence the continuing changes in the concepts, methodology, and techniques of behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy. A particular feature of the journal is its broad ranging scope - both in terms of topics and types of study covered. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy encompasses most areas of human behaviour and experience, and represents many different research methods, from randomized controlled trials to detailed case studies.
期刊最新文献
'Flashforward' mental imagery in adolescents: exploring developmental differences and associations with mental health. Influential Relationship Questionnaire (IRQ): psychometric characteristics of an abbreviated Spanish version. The outcomes of imagery-focused interventions in relation to distress in people with delusions: a systematic literature review. The relationship between perfectionism and self-esteem in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis Telehealth-delivered recovery-orientated well-being plan group program for bipolar disorder: a pilot randomised feasibility and acceptability study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1