Regional Elective Day Procedure Centre Pilot- the solution to waiting lists and trainee deficit in the reshaping of services following COVID-19?

The Ulster medical journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-29
Rachael Coulson, Sarah Small, Robert Spence, Ian McAllister
{"title":"Regional Elective Day Procedure Centre Pilot- the solution to waiting lists and trainee deficit in the reshaping of services following COVID-19?","authors":"Rachael Coulson, Sarah Small, Robert Spence, Ian McAllister","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Consequences from the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in the secondary impact of cessation of elective surgical services, amplifying the waiting list problem with devastating patient and surgical training repercussions. With the introduction of the first regional inter-trust daycase elective care centre pilot in Northern Ireland, we aim to assess the impact of this pathway on elective inguinal hernia waiting lists, patient outcomes, and influence on surgical training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was collected prospectively over a 10-week pilot of consecutive elective day case hernia lists at a newly established regional day surgery centre. Key operative time points for each patient were collated via the Theatre Management System (TMS). Retrospective patient feedback was collected from participating patients via 26-question telephone survey at 6 weeks post-operatively. Trainees allocated to the participating units during this pilot received a retrospective electronic survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five patients underwent open unilateral elective inguinal hernia repair, 54% of cases were trainee led. Median trainee operating time of 53 minutes compared with 51 minutes for consultant led procedures, with no significant difference consultant vs non-consultant as primary operator (p>0.05). On completion of the pilot, waiting list numbers were reduced by a third, 75% of trainees feedback reported increased confidence with surgical operative exposure, and high levels of patient satisfaction reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inter-trust day surgery at a dedicated green site could successfully contribute to resuming and reforming surgical services, addressing the impact on mounting waiting lists with positive patient impact as well as providing an excellent training opportunity to narrow the observed training deficit.</p>","PeriodicalId":94250,"journal":{"name":"The Ulster medical journal","volume":"92 3","pages":"129-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10824138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Ulster medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Consequences from the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in the secondary impact of cessation of elective surgical services, amplifying the waiting list problem with devastating patient and surgical training repercussions. With the introduction of the first regional inter-trust daycase elective care centre pilot in Northern Ireland, we aim to assess the impact of this pathway on elective inguinal hernia waiting lists, patient outcomes, and influence on surgical training.

Methods: Data was collected prospectively over a 10-week pilot of consecutive elective day case hernia lists at a newly established regional day surgery centre. Key operative time points for each patient were collated via the Theatre Management System (TMS). Retrospective patient feedback was collected from participating patients via 26-question telephone survey at 6 weeks post-operatively. Trainees allocated to the participating units during this pilot received a retrospective electronic survey.

Results: Fifty-five patients underwent open unilateral elective inguinal hernia repair, 54% of cases were trainee led. Median trainee operating time of 53 minutes compared with 51 minutes for consultant led procedures, with no significant difference consultant vs non-consultant as primary operator (p>0.05). On completion of the pilot, waiting list numbers were reduced by a third, 75% of trainees feedback reported increased confidence with surgical operative exposure, and high levels of patient satisfaction reported.

Conclusion: Inter-trust day surgery at a dedicated green site could successfully contribute to resuming and reforming surgical services, addressing the impact on mounting waiting lists with positive patient impact as well as providing an excellent training opportunity to narrow the observed training deficit.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地区日间择期手术中心试点--在 COVID-19 之后的服务重塑中解决候诊名单和实习生不足的问题?
背景:COVID-19大流行的后果是导致择期手术服务停止的次要影响,扩大了候诊名单问题,对患者和手术培训造成了破坏性影响。随着北爱尔兰首个区域信托间日间病例择期治疗中心试点的推出,我们旨在评估该路径对择期腹股沟疝候诊名单、患者预后以及对外科培训的影响:方法:在一个新成立的地区日间手术中心,对连续的择期日间病例疝列表进行了为期 10 周的试点,并对数据进行了前瞻性收集。通过手术室管理系统(TMS)整理每位患者的关键手术时间点。术后 6 周时,通过 26 个问题的电话调查收集参与患者的反馈意见。试点期间分配到参与单位的受训人员也收到了一份回顾性电子调查:55名患者接受了开腹单侧腹股沟疝修补术,其中54%的病例由受训人员主导。受训人员手术时间中位数为 53 分钟,而顾问主导的手术时间中位数为 51 分钟,顾问与非顾问作为主要操作者的差异不大(P>0.05)。试点项目结束后,候诊人数减少了三分之一,75% 的受训人员反馈称对手术操作的信心有所增强,患者满意度也很高:结论:在专门的绿色基地开展信托间日间手术可成功促进外科服务的恢复和改革,解决候诊人数不断增加的问题,对患者产生积极影响,并提供绝佳的培训机会,缩小观察到的培训赤字。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Curiositas - Teenage Kicks. Current Practice and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection for Renal Cell Metastases to the Pancreas in Northern Ireland. Deeds not Words. Ethics - A matter of principle? First use of Bedaquiline, Linezolid, and Pretomanid (BPaL) in a family cluster of multi-drug resistant (MDR) TB infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1