Psychosocial Health Outcomes of Children Following Family Reunification: Longitudinal Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trial Data

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Child and Family Studies Pub Date : 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1007/s10826-023-02773-z
Eddy J. Walakira, Helen P. M. Natukunda, Jaffer Byawaka, Francis Kato, Nanmathi Manian, Lucie Cluver, Lorraine Sherr, Karen Megazzini, Lindsey Lange, Daniel Oliver
{"title":"Psychosocial Health Outcomes of Children Following Family Reunification: Longitudinal Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trial Data","authors":"Eddy J. Walakira, Helen P. M. Natukunda, Jaffer Byawaka, Francis Kato, Nanmathi Manian, Lucie Cluver, Lorraine Sherr, Karen Megazzini, Lindsey Lange, Daniel Oliver","doi":"10.1007/s10826-023-02773-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This longitudinal study examined the psychosocial health trajectories of children following reunification from residential care and the associated contextual factors. Data were drawn from a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effects of a parenting programme on the successful reunification and reintegration of 1–13-year-old children with their families, in nine districts in Uganda. Families were randomised to receive either a basic reintegration package consisting of a reunification grant and case management (standard intervention) or an enhanced package consisting of the basic package plus 13 bi-weekly training sessions of a parenting programme (enhanced intervention). Data were collected from caregivers at home and the residential care facilities, as well as the children (n = 55 dyadic pairs) through prospective interviews at baseline (before reunification), and at 6- and 12-months post-reunification. Predictive growth curve analyses assessed longitudinal changes in child psychosocial problems (externalizing, internalizing, total behavioural problems) and associated contextual factors. In age, sex, and study arm stratified analyses, we found declining linear trajectories in children’s psychosocial problem scores at 6 and 12 months post-reunification. Taking covariates into account, persistent externalizing, internalizing, and total behavioural problems at endline were associated with children’s depressive symptoms, caregiver characteristics and quality of caregiving. Our findings suggest that children who are reunified from residential to family-based care have fewer psychosocial problems post-reunification compared to their time in residential care. These findings did not differ by age and sex of the child or type of reintegration package received. Although findings from our small single study have limited generalizability and should be interpreted with caution for policy and programming, they underscore the potential benefits of reunification programmes for children’s psychosocial well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":48362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child and Family Studies","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child and Family Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-023-02773-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This longitudinal study examined the psychosocial health trajectories of children following reunification from residential care and the associated contextual factors. Data were drawn from a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effects of a parenting programme on the successful reunification and reintegration of 1–13-year-old children with their families, in nine districts in Uganda. Families were randomised to receive either a basic reintegration package consisting of a reunification grant and case management (standard intervention) or an enhanced package consisting of the basic package plus 13 bi-weekly training sessions of a parenting programme (enhanced intervention). Data were collected from caregivers at home and the residential care facilities, as well as the children (n = 55 dyadic pairs) through prospective interviews at baseline (before reunification), and at 6- and 12-months post-reunification. Predictive growth curve analyses assessed longitudinal changes in child psychosocial problems (externalizing, internalizing, total behavioural problems) and associated contextual factors. In age, sex, and study arm stratified analyses, we found declining linear trajectories in children’s psychosocial problem scores at 6 and 12 months post-reunification. Taking covariates into account, persistent externalizing, internalizing, and total behavioural problems at endline were associated with children’s depressive symptoms, caregiver characteristics and quality of caregiving. Our findings suggest that children who are reunified from residential to family-based care have fewer psychosocial problems post-reunification compared to their time in residential care. These findings did not differ by age and sex of the child or type of reintegration package received. Although findings from our small single study have limited generalizability and should be interpreted with caution for policy and programming, they underscore the potential benefits of reunification programmes for children’s psychosocial well-being.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭团聚后儿童的社会心理健康结果:随机对照试验数据的纵向分析
这项纵向研究考察了儿童与寄宿家庭团聚后的社会心理健康轨迹以及相关的环境因素。研究数据来自一项随机对照试验,该试验评估了乌干达九个地区的一项亲职教育计划对 1-13 岁儿童与家人成功团聚和重返社会的影响。这些家庭被随机分配接受由团聚补助金和个案管理组成的基本重返社会方案(标准干预),或由基本方案加上每两周 13 次的育儿计划培训课程组成的强化方案(强化干预)。通过基线(团聚前)、团聚后 6 个月和 12 个月的前瞻性访谈,从家庭和寄宿护理机构的照顾者以及儿童(n = 55 对父母)那里收集了数据。预测成长曲线分析评估了儿童心理社会问题(外化、内化、总行为问题)和相关环境因素的纵向变化。通过对年龄、性别和研究机构进行分层分析,我们发现儿童在与父母团聚后 6 个月和 12 个月的社会心理问题得分呈线性下降趋势。考虑到协变因素,终点时持续存在的外化、内化和总体行为问题与儿童的抑郁症状、照顾者特征和照顾质量有关。我们的研究结果表明,与寄宿照料相比,从寄宿照料转为家庭照料的儿童在重新团聚后出现的社会心理问题更少。这些结果并未因儿童的年龄、性别或所接受的重返社会方案类型而有所不同。虽然我们的小型单项研究结果的普遍性有限,在解释政策和计划时应谨慎,但这些结果强调了团聚计划对儿童心理社会福祉的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: Journal of Child and Family Studies (JCFS) international, peer-reviewed forum for topical issues pertaining to the behavioral health and well-being of children, adolescents, and their families. Interdisciplinary and ecological in approach, the journal focuses on individual, family, and community contexts that influence child, youth, and family well-being and translates research results into practical applications for providers, program implementers, and policymakers. Original papers address applied and translational research, program evaluation, service delivery, and policy matters that affect child, youth, and family well-being. Topic areas include but are not limited to: enhancing child, youth/young adult, parent, caregiver, and/or family functioning; prevention and intervention related to social, emotional, or behavioral functioning in children, youth, and families; cumulative effects of risk and protective factors on behavioral health, development, and well-being; the effects both of exposure to adverse childhood events and assets/protective factors; child abuse and neglect, housing instability and homelessness, and related ecological factors influencing child and family outcomes.
期刊最新文献
An Archival Study of the Relationship Between Treatment Duration, Functioning, and Out-of-Home Placement for Youth with Serious Emotional Disturbance in a State-Wide Intensive In-Home Family Treatment Program Sibling-Mediated Early Start Denver Model Support for Young Autistic Children How the COVID-19 Pandemic Influenced Veteran Parents’ Harsh Parenting: Do Parental PTSD and Parental Role Matter? Video Games, Violence Justification and Child-to-Parent Violence The Protective Role of Supportive Relationships in Mitigating Bullying Victimization and Psychological Distress in Adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1