Process over product: associations among math anxiety, feelings about math, and instructional beliefs in early childhood preservice teachers

IF 2.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1007/s10857-023-09613-3
Amber Beisly, Samantha Evans, Laura Latta
{"title":"Process over product: associations among math anxiety, feelings about math, and instructional beliefs in early childhood preservice teachers","authors":"Amber Beisly, Samantha Evans, Laura Latta","doi":"10.1007/s10857-023-09613-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Providing high-quality mathematics instruction is vital for children because early mathematics skills are a strong predictor of later academic success. Unfortunately, not all early childhood preservice teachers (PSTs) have positive attitudes toward mathematics and, as a group, report one of the highest levels of mathematics anxiety (Bates, A. B., Latham, N. I., and Kim, J. A. (2013). Do I have to teach math? Early childhood preservice teachers' fears of teaching mathematics. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 5. www.k-12prep.mathematics.ttu.edu; Beilock, S. L., and Maloney, E. A. (2015). Math anxiety: A factor in math achievement not to be ignored. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 4–12. 10.1177/2372732215601438). Nonetheless, very few studies have looked at early childhood mathematics teachers as a group with specific knowledge, skills, and beliefs (Parks and Wager, Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 36:124–141, 2015). This study investigated associations among teacher characteristics (e.g., age, educational level), mathematics anxiety, beliefs, pedagogy, and attitudes toward mathematics. Significant differences were found in teachers’ mathematics anxiety by PSTs’ age but not level of education. The level of education was able to predict PSTs reform-based beliefs and positive attitudes toward mathematics. In light of these findings, it is essential to support both positive attitudes and inquiry-based instructional methods in PSTs to encourage the development of teachers who are confident and competent in teaching mathematics (Lake &amp; Kelly, Lake and Kelly, Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 35:262–275, 2014).</p>","PeriodicalId":47442,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education","volume":"160 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09613-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Providing high-quality mathematics instruction is vital for children because early mathematics skills are a strong predictor of later academic success. Unfortunately, not all early childhood preservice teachers (PSTs) have positive attitudes toward mathematics and, as a group, report one of the highest levels of mathematics anxiety (Bates, A. B., Latham, N. I., and Kim, J. A. (2013). Do I have to teach math? Early childhood preservice teachers' fears of teaching mathematics. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 5. www.k-12prep.mathematics.ttu.edu; Beilock, S. L., and Maloney, E. A. (2015). Math anxiety: A factor in math achievement not to be ignored. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 4–12. 10.1177/2372732215601438). Nonetheless, very few studies have looked at early childhood mathematics teachers as a group with specific knowledge, skills, and beliefs (Parks and Wager, Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 36:124–141, 2015). This study investigated associations among teacher characteristics (e.g., age, educational level), mathematics anxiety, beliefs, pedagogy, and attitudes toward mathematics. Significant differences were found in teachers’ mathematics anxiety by PSTs’ age but not level of education. The level of education was able to predict PSTs reform-based beliefs and positive attitudes toward mathematics. In light of these findings, it is essential to support both positive attitudes and inquiry-based instructional methods in PSTs to encourage the development of teachers who are confident and competent in teaching mathematics (Lake & Kelly, Lake and Kelly, Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 35:262–275, 2014).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过程重于结果:幼儿职前教师的数学焦虑、数学感受和教学信念之间的联系
提供高质量的数学教学对儿童至关重要,因为早期数学技能是日后学业成功的有力 预测因素。遗憾的是,并非所有的幼儿职前教师(PSTs)都对数学抱有积极的态度,作为一个群体,他们的数学焦虑程度是最高的(Bates, A. B., Latham, N. I., and Kim, J. A. (2013)。我必须教数学吗?幼儿职前教师对数学教学的恐惧》。www.k-12prep.mathematics.ttu.edu; Beilock, S. L., and Maloney, E. A. (2015).数学焦虑:数学焦虑:数学成绩不容忽视的因素。来自行为和脑科学的政策见解》,2(1),4-12。10.1177/2372732215601438).然而,很少有研究将幼儿数学教师作为一个具有特定知识、技能和信念的群体来研究(Parks and Wager, Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 36:124-141, 2015)。本研究调查了教师特征(如年龄、教育水平)、数学焦虑、信念、教学法和对数学的态度之间的关联。研究发现,教师的数学焦虑与 PST 的年龄存在显著差异,但与教育水平无关。教育水平能够预测 PST 基于改革的信念和对数学的积极态度。鉴于这些研究结果,必须支持幼儿教师的积极态度和探究式教学方法,以鼓励培养有信心和有能力教授数学的教师(Lake & Kelly, Lake and Kelly, Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 35:262-275, 2014)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education (JMTE) is devoted to research into the education of mathematics teachers and development of teaching that promotes students'' successful learning of mathematics. JMTE focuses on all stages of professional development of mathematics teachers and teacher-educators and serves as a forum for considering institutional, societal and cultural influences that impact on teachers'' learning, and ultimately that of their students. Critical analyses of particular programmes, development initiatives, technology, assessment, teaching diverse populations and policy matters, as these topics relate to the main focuses of the journal, are welcome. All papers are rigorously refereed. Papers may be submitted to one of three sections of JMTE as follows: Research papers: these papers should reflect the main focuses of the journal identified above and should be of more than local or national interest. Mathematics Teacher Education Around the World: these papers focus on programmes and issues of national significance that could be of wider interest or influence. Reader Commentary: these are short contributions; for example, offering a response to a paper published in JMTE or developing a theoretical idea. Authors should state clearly the section to which they are submitting a paper. As general guidance, papers should not normally exceed the following word lengths: (1) 10,000 words; (2) 5,000 words; (3) 3,000 words. Maximum word lengths exclude references, figures, appendices, etc. Critiques of reports or books that relate to the main focuses of JMTE appear as appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Mathematics teacher educators’ navigational expertise when designing multimodal representations of practice: a semiotic analysis Publishing mathematics education research in English: amplifying voices from the field Profiling mathematics teacher educators' readiness for digital technology integration: evidence from Zambia Research-based design of coaching for ambitious mathematics instruction Learning through teaching: novice mathematics teacher educators coping with unfamiliarity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1