Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors in controlling ADHD symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Middle East Current Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1186/s43045-024-00400-1
Ramin Abdi Dezfouli, Ali Hosseinpour, Shera Ketabforoush, Elnaz Daneshzad
{"title":"Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors in controlling ADHD symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Ramin Abdi Dezfouli, Ali Hosseinpour, Shera Ketabforoush, Elnaz Daneshzad","doi":"10.1186/s43045-024-00400-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) in managing ADHD symptoms compared to placebo, stimulants, or compared as pre- and post-treatment. Clinical trials assessing the potency of SNRIs in treating ADHD patients were imported from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus (until February 2023). Data were extracted by two independent researchers. Random- and fixed- effect meta-analysis was performed to pool the data. Publication bias and study heterogeneity were assessed. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was utilized to determine the risk of bias. The certainty of outcomes was evaluated by the Grade criteria. Of the initial 830 studies, 13 were finally imported after two screening stages which two separate researchers carried out. The pooled standardized mean difference (95% CI) of reducing the score of different ADHD questionnaires (showing reduction in total inattentive and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms) by SNRIs, venlafaxine, and duloxetine were − 2.20 [− 3.00, − 1.40], − 1.86 [− 2.69, − 1.02], − 2.65 [− 3.35, − 1.96], respectively. While the most reported side effects were nausea, abdominal pain, and sedation, all studies reported that side effects were not serious and were well tolerated. Outcomes for the effectiveness of venlafaxine and duloxetine got high and moderate certainty, respectively. Duloxetine and venlafaxine can be administered to treat symptoms of ADHD while being well tolerated. It seems that duloxetine is more potent in reducing ADHD symptoms. It can also be concluded that venlafaxine is more effective in females, and is more effective on inattentive symptoms of ADHD rather than hyperactive symptoms.","PeriodicalId":38653,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Current Psychiatry","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Current Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-024-00400-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) in managing ADHD symptoms compared to placebo, stimulants, or compared as pre- and post-treatment. Clinical trials assessing the potency of SNRIs in treating ADHD patients were imported from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus (until February 2023). Data were extracted by two independent researchers. Random- and fixed- effect meta-analysis was performed to pool the data. Publication bias and study heterogeneity were assessed. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was utilized to determine the risk of bias. The certainty of outcomes was evaluated by the Grade criteria. Of the initial 830 studies, 13 were finally imported after two screening stages which two separate researchers carried out. The pooled standardized mean difference (95% CI) of reducing the score of different ADHD questionnaires (showing reduction in total inattentive and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms) by SNRIs, venlafaxine, and duloxetine were − 2.20 [− 3.00, − 1.40], − 1.86 [− 2.69, − 1.02], − 2.65 [− 3.35, − 1.96], respectively. While the most reported side effects were nausea, abdominal pain, and sedation, all studies reported that side effects were not serious and were well tolerated. Outcomes for the effectiveness of venlafaxine and duloxetine got high and moderate certainty, respectively. Duloxetine and venlafaxine can be administered to treat symptoms of ADHD while being well tolerated. It seems that duloxetine is more potent in reducing ADHD symptoms. It can also be concluded that venlafaxine is more effective in females, and is more effective on inattentive symptoms of ADHD rather than hyperactive symptoms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血清素-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂控制多动症症状的疗效、安全性和耐受性:系统回顾和荟萃分析
本研究旨在评估5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)与安慰剂、兴奋剂相比,或与治疗前后相比,在控制ADHD症状方面的有效性。从 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Scopus(截至 2023 年 2 月)中导入了评估 SNRIs 治疗多动症患者疗效的临床试验。数据由两名独立研究人员提取。对数据进行随机和固定效应荟萃分析。对发表偏倚和研究异质性进行了评估。利用 Cochrane 协作工具确定偏倚风险。结果的确定性按照等级标准进行评估。在最初的 830 项研究中,经过两名研究人员分别进行的两个筛选阶段后,最终输入了 13 项研究。SNRIs、文拉法辛和度洛西汀降低不同ADHD问卷得分(显示注意力不集中和多动/冲动症状总数的减少)的汇总标准化平均差(95% CI)分别为- 2.20 [- 3.00, - 1.40]、- 1.86 [- 2.69, - 1.02]、- 2.65 [- 3.35, - 1.96]。虽然报告最多的副作用是恶心、腹痛和镇静,但所有研究都表明副作用并不严重,而且耐受性良好。文拉法辛和度洛西汀疗效的确定性分别为高和中等。度洛西汀和文拉法辛可用于治疗多动症症状,且耐受性良好。看来度洛西汀在减轻多动症症状方面更有效。还可以得出结论,文拉法辛对女性更有效,对注意力不集中的多动症症状比多动症状更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Middle East Current Psychiatry
Middle East Current Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Virtual reality in telepsychiatry is a new horizon for immersive mental health therapy Status and sociodemographic correlates of pathological internet use among adolescents in Jordan: a cross-sectional study Post-traumatic stress disorder among nursing students at Palestine Polytechnique University during the Gaza war and the attack on the health care system Psychological assessment of violent behaviors in schizophrenic patients followed up in My EL Hassan health center of Kenitra, Morocco Burnout syndrome, anxiety, and depression symptoms among workers in radiation field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1