Trusted Information Sources About the COVID-19 Vaccine Vary in Underserved Communities.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Community Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1007/s10900-023-01319-0
Brian R Benson, Syed A Rahman, Jacob Bleasdale, Shunlei Win, Kaylyn Townsend-Kensinger, Matthew Cole, Kabir Jalal, Jihnhee Yu, Gene D Morse, James L Mohler, Rolanda L Ward
{"title":"Trusted Information Sources About the COVID-19 Vaccine Vary in Underserved Communities.","authors":"Brian R Benson, Syed A Rahman, Jacob Bleasdale, Shunlei Win, Kaylyn Townsend-Kensinger, Matthew Cole, Kabir Jalal, Jihnhee Yu, Gene D Morse, James L Mohler, Rolanda L Ward","doi":"10.1007/s10900-023-01319-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic was one of the deadliest global public health events. In the United States, over 1.1 million individuals have died, and now COVID-19 is the third leading cause of death (CDC, 2023). Vaccine uptake has stalled among different demographics. Vaccine hesitancy, a delay in accepting or refusing vaccines, poses a significant challenge regardless of the availability of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines. This study aimed to identify disparate COVID-19 vaccine uptake among individuals in Western New York. The primary objective was to identify the factors contributing to lower rates of COVID-19 vaccination within this population.Data were collected from 585 adults recruited from 20 Niagara and Erie Counties sites using a self-administered survey on vaccine hesitancy, vaccination status, and COVID-19-related characteristics. The survey included the adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (aVHS) and acquired information on demographic characteristics and COVID-19 impact, knowledge, and information sources. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, a chi-squared test, a Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and a logistic regression model.Findings suggest that unvaccinated participants (n = 35) were concerned about vaccine side effects (48.6%). For vaccinated/unboosted participants (n = 52), they (40.0%) reported clinical concerns. After adjusting for gender and age, healthcare provider guidance and family guidance remained significant predictors of vaccination status, while clinical research studies were significant predictors of booster status. Findings from this study suggest public health interventions that target vaccine education and facilitate well-informed decisions about COVID-19 vaccines lead to less vaccine hesitancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11306264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-023-01319-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic was one of the deadliest global public health events. In the United States, over 1.1 million individuals have died, and now COVID-19 is the third leading cause of death (CDC, 2023). Vaccine uptake has stalled among different demographics. Vaccine hesitancy, a delay in accepting or refusing vaccines, poses a significant challenge regardless of the availability of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines. This study aimed to identify disparate COVID-19 vaccine uptake among individuals in Western New York. The primary objective was to identify the factors contributing to lower rates of COVID-19 vaccination within this population.Data were collected from 585 adults recruited from 20 Niagara and Erie Counties sites using a self-administered survey on vaccine hesitancy, vaccination status, and COVID-19-related characteristics. The survey included the adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (aVHS) and acquired information on demographic characteristics and COVID-19 impact, knowledge, and information sources. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, a chi-squared test, a Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and a logistic regression model.Findings suggest that unvaccinated participants (n = 35) were concerned about vaccine side effects (48.6%). For vaccinated/unboosted participants (n = 52), they (40.0%) reported clinical concerns. After adjusting for gender and age, healthcare provider guidance and family guidance remained significant predictors of vaccination status, while clinical research studies were significant predictors of booster status. Findings from this study suggest public health interventions that target vaccine education and facilitate well-informed decisions about COVID-19 vaccines lead to less vaccine hesitancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在医疗服务不足的社区,有关 COVID-19 疫苗的可信信息来源各不相同。
COVID-19 大流行是最致命的全球公共卫生事件之一。在美国,已有 110 多万人死亡,COVID-19 现在已成为第三大死亡原因(美国疾病预防控制中心,2023 年)。不同人群的疫苗接种率停滞不前。无论是否有安全有效的 COVID-19 疫苗,疫苗犹豫不决(延迟接受或拒绝接受疫苗)都是一个重大挑战。本研究旨在确定纽约州西部不同人群对 COVID-19 疫苗接种情况的差异。数据收集自尼亚加拉县和伊利县的 20 个地点招募的 585 名成年人,采用自填式调查方式,调查内容包括疫苗接种犹豫、疫苗接种状况以及 COVID-19 疫苗相关特征。调查内容包括成人疫苗接种犹豫量表 (aVHS),以及有关人口特征、COVID-19 影响、知识和信息来源的信息。调查结果显示,未接种者(35 人)担心疫苗的副作用(48.6%)。已接种/未加强接种的参与者(n = 52)中,他们(40.0%)报告了临床担忧。在对性别和年龄进行调整后,医疗保健提供者的指导和家庭的指导仍然是疫苗接种状况的重要预测因素,而临床研究则是加强接种状况的重要预测因素。本研究结果表明,针对疫苗教育和促进对 COVID-19 疫苗做出知情决定的公共卫生干预措施可减少疫苗接种犹豫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
1.70%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Health is a peer-reviewed publication that offers original articles on research, teaching, and the practice of community health and public health. Coverage includes public health, epidemiology, preventive medicine, health promotion, disease prevention, environmental and occupational health, health policy and management, and health disparities. The Journal does not publish articles on clinical medicine. Serving as a forum for the exchange of ideas, the Journal features articles on research that serve the educational needs of public and community health personnel.
期刊最新文献
Psychiatrists' Perceptions of the Role of Journalists in Suicide Reporting and Prejudices about Mental Illnesses in Portugal. The Association of Sexual Minority Status with the Prevalence, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Depression among NYC Adults. Association of National Identity and Trust in Government with COVID-19 Vaccination and Brand Choice in Taiwan. The Influence of the COVID 19 Pandemic on Food Insecurity Among Cancer Survivors Across New York State. Zika Virus Infection Knowledge and Communication Preferences Among Women of Reproductive Age in Central Brooklyn, New York: A Thematic Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1