Rapid Start of Antiretroviral Therapy in a Large Urban Clinic in the US South: Impact on HIV Care Continuum Outcomes and Medication Adherence.

Jeremy Y Chow, Ang Gao, Chul Ahn, Ank E Nijhawan
{"title":"Rapid Start of Antiretroviral Therapy in a Large Urban Clinic in the US South: Impact on HIV Care Continuum Outcomes and Medication Adherence.","authors":"Jeremy Y Chow, Ang Gao, Chul Ahn, Ank E Nijhawan","doi":"10.1177/23259582241228164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid start of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been associated with improvement in several HIV-related outcomes in clinical trials as well as demonstration projects, but how regional and contextual differences may affect the effectiveness of this intervention necessitates further study. In this study of a large, urban, Southern US clinic-based retrospective cohort, we identified 544 patients with a new diagnosis of HIV during 2016 to 2019 and compared HIV care continuum outcomes for the first 12 months of care before and after rapid start implementation. Kaplan-Meier time-to-event curves were used to summarize time to virologic suppression, and stepwise Cox, linear, and logistic regression models were used to create multivariate models to evaluate the association between rapid start and time to virologic suppression, medication adherence, and retention in care and sustained virologic suppression, respectively. We found that rapid start was significantly associated with improved medication adherence scores (+15.37 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.36-21.39, <i>P</i> < .01) and retention in care (adjusted odds ratio = 1.51, 95% CI 1.05-2.19, <i>P</i> = .03). Time to virologic suppression (median 2.46 months before, 2.56 months after rapid start) and sustained virologic suppression were not associated with rapid start in our setting. Though rapid start was associated with improved medication adherence and retention in care, more support may be needed to achieve the same outcomes seen in other studies and sustained over the entire HIV care continuum, especially in settings with significant patient and systemic barriers to care such as unstable housing, lack of Medicaid expansion, and frequent coverage interruptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"23259582241228164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10832401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259582241228164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid start of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been associated with improvement in several HIV-related outcomes in clinical trials as well as demonstration projects, but how regional and contextual differences may affect the effectiveness of this intervention necessitates further study. In this study of a large, urban, Southern US clinic-based retrospective cohort, we identified 544 patients with a new diagnosis of HIV during 2016 to 2019 and compared HIV care continuum outcomes for the first 12 months of care before and after rapid start implementation. Kaplan-Meier time-to-event curves were used to summarize time to virologic suppression, and stepwise Cox, linear, and logistic regression models were used to create multivariate models to evaluate the association between rapid start and time to virologic suppression, medication adherence, and retention in care and sustained virologic suppression, respectively. We found that rapid start was significantly associated with improved medication adherence scores (+15.37 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.36-21.39, P < .01) and retention in care (adjusted odds ratio = 1.51, 95% CI 1.05-2.19, P = .03). Time to virologic suppression (median 2.46 months before, 2.56 months after rapid start) and sustained virologic suppression were not associated with rapid start in our setting. Though rapid start was associated with improved medication adherence and retention in care, more support may be needed to achieve the same outcomes seen in other studies and sustained over the entire HIV care continuum, especially in settings with significant patient and systemic barriers to care such as unstable housing, lack of Medicaid expansion, and frequent coverage interruptions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国南部一个大型城市诊所快速启动抗逆转录病毒疗法:对艾滋病连续治疗结果和用药依从性的影响》(HIV Care Continuum Results and Medication Adherence)。
在临床试验和示范项目中,抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的快速启动与多种艾滋病相关结果的改善有关,但地区和环境差异会如何影响这一干预措施的有效性,还需要进一步研究。在这项以美国南部大型城市诊所为基础的回顾性队列研究中,我们确定了 544 名在 2016 年至 2019 年期间新诊断出艾滋病的患者,并比较了快速启动实施前后前 12 个月的艾滋病护理连续性结果。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 时间到事件曲线来总结病毒学抑制时间,并使用逐步 Cox、线性和逻辑回归模型来创建多变量模型,分别评估快速启动与病毒学抑制时间、药物依从性、护理保留率和持续病毒学抑制之间的关联。我们发现,快速起始与用药依从性评分的提高有明显关系(+15.37 分,95% 置信区间 [CI] 9.36-21.39,P P = .03)。在我们的研究中,病毒学抑制时间(快速启动前的中位数为 2.46 个月,快速启动后为 2.56 个月)和持续病毒学抑制与快速启动无关。虽然快速启动与改善服药依从性和坚持治疗有关,但可能需要更多的支持才能取得与其他研究相同的结果,并在整个艾滋病治疗过程中持续保持,尤其是在患者和系统性治疗障碍严重的环境中,如住房不稳定、医疗补助计划缺乏扩展以及保险频繁中断等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Providers as Health Discussants on Black Women's Interest in PrEP for HIV Prevention. The Provider's Role in Retaining Black Women With HIV in Care: A Scoping Review. Rapid Start of Antiretroviral Therapy in a Large Urban Clinic in the US South: Impact on HIV Care Continuum Outcomes and Medication Adherence. Dissemination of the Women-Centred HIV Care Model: A Multimodal Process and Evaluation. Policy and Programming Towards Addressing Treatment Gaps in Adolescents Living with HIV: A Content Analysis of Policy and Programme Documents in Namibia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1