Effects of physical exercise interventions on balance, postural stability and general mobility in Parkinson's disease: a network meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.2340/jrm.v56.10329
Patricia Lorenzo-García, Iván Cavero-Redondo, Sergio Núñez de Arenas-Arroyo, María José Guzmán-Pavón, Susana Priego-Jiménez, Celia Álvarez-Bueno
{"title":"Effects of physical exercise interventions on balance, postural stability and general mobility in Parkinson's disease: a network meta-analysis.","authors":"Patricia Lorenzo-García, Iván Cavero-Redondo, Sergio Núñez de Arenas-Arroyo, María José Guzmán-Pavón, Susana Priego-Jiménez, Celia Álvarez-Bueno","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v56.10329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess which type of physical exercise intervention has the most beneficial effects on balance, postural stability and general mobility in patients with Parkinson's disease. These parameters were assessed using the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (MiniBESTest) and Timed Up and Go Test (TUG).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases were searched up to August 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials on the effects of physical exercise interventions on balance, postural stability, and general mobility. The network meta-analysis included pairwise and indirect comparisons of results on the ABC scale, BBS, MiniBESTest, and TUG across 8 categories of physical exercise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-six studies with a total of 4,693 patients were included. For the ABC scale, the indirect comparison showed that the highest effect size was observed for balance vs sensorimotor training without including endurance interventions (0.62; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.06, 1.17). The highest effect sizes for BBS were observed for alternative exercises (1.21; 95% CI 0.62, 1.81), body-weight supported (BWS) interventions (1.31; 95% CI 0.57, 2.05), dance (1.18; 95% CI 0.33, 2.03) and sensorimotor training, including endurance interventions (1.10; 95% CI 0.46, 1.75) vs control groups. Indirect comparisons showed that the highest effect size for the MiniBESTest were observed for balance (0.75; 95% CI 0.46, 1.04) and resistance (0.58; 95% CI 0.10, 1.07) vs control groups. For the TUG, comparisons showed a significant effect size for alternative exercises (-0.54; 95% CI -0.82, -0.26), balance (-0.42; 95% CI -0.75, -0.08), resistance (-0.60; 95% CI -0.89, -0.31), and sensorimotor training including endurance interventions (-0.61; 95% CI -0.95, -0.27) vs control comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Balance interventions improve balance, postural stability, and general mobility in people with Parkinson's disease. Moreover, alternative exercises, dance, BWS interventions, resistance, and sensorimotor training, including and not including endurance interventions, are also effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10847976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.10329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess which type of physical exercise intervention has the most beneficial effects on balance, postural stability and general mobility in patients with Parkinson's disease. These parameters were assessed using the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (MiniBESTest) and Timed Up and Go Test (TUG).

Design: Network meta-analysis.

Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases were searched up to August 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials on the effects of physical exercise interventions on balance, postural stability, and general mobility. The network meta-analysis included pairwise and indirect comparisons of results on the ABC scale, BBS, MiniBESTest, and TUG across 8 categories of physical exercise.

Results: Eighty-six studies with a total of 4,693 patients were included. For the ABC scale, the indirect comparison showed that the highest effect size was observed for balance vs sensorimotor training without including endurance interventions (0.62; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.06, 1.17). The highest effect sizes for BBS were observed for alternative exercises (1.21; 95% CI 0.62, 1.81), body-weight supported (BWS) interventions (1.31; 95% CI 0.57, 2.05), dance (1.18; 95% CI 0.33, 2.03) and sensorimotor training, including endurance interventions (1.10; 95% CI 0.46, 1.75) vs control groups. Indirect comparisons showed that the highest effect size for the MiniBESTest were observed for balance (0.75; 95% CI 0.46, 1.04) and resistance (0.58; 95% CI 0.10, 1.07) vs control groups. For the TUG, comparisons showed a significant effect size for alternative exercises (-0.54; 95% CI -0.82, -0.26), balance (-0.42; 95% CI -0.75, -0.08), resistance (-0.60; 95% CI -0.89, -0.31), and sensorimotor training including endurance interventions (-0.61; 95% CI -0.95, -0.27) vs control comparisons.

Conclusion: Balance interventions improve balance, postural stability, and general mobility in people with Parkinson's disease. Moreover, alternative exercises, dance, BWS interventions, resistance, and sensorimotor training, including and not including endurance interventions, are also effective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育锻炼干预对帕金森病患者平衡能力、姿势稳定性和一般活动能力的影响:网络荟萃分析。
目的评估哪种类型的体育锻炼干预对帕金森病患者的平衡能力、姿势稳定性和一般活动能力最有益。这些参数通过特定活动平衡信心量表(ABC)、伯格平衡量表(BBS)、迷你平衡评估系统测试(MiniBESTest)和定时起立行走测试(TUG)进行评估:设计:网络荟萃分析:对截至 2022 年 8 月的 PubMed、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 和 Web of Science 数据库进行检索,以确定体育锻炼干预对平衡、姿势稳定性和一般活动能力影响的随机对照试验。网络荟萃分析包括对8类体育锻炼的ABC量表、BBS、MiniBESTest和TUG结果进行配对和间接比较:结果:共纳入了 86 项研究,涉及 4693 名患者。就 ABC 量表而言,间接比较显示,在不包括耐力干预措施的情况下,平衡与感觉运动训练的效应大小最高(0.62;95% 置信区间 (95% CI) 0.06,1.17)。替代运动(1.21;95% 置信区间 0.62,1.81)、体重支持(BWS)干预(1.31;95% 置信区间 0.57,2.05)、舞蹈(1.18;95% 置信区间 0.33,2.03)和包括耐力干预的感觉运动训练(1.10;95% 置信区间 0.46,1.75)与对照组相比,BBS 的效应大小最大。间接比较结果显示,MiniBESTest 的最高效应大小出现在平衡组(0.75;95% CI 0.46,1.04)和阻力组(0.58;95% CI 0.10,1.07)与对照组的比较中。就 TUG 而言,与对照组相比,替代运动(-0.54;95% CI -0.82,-0.26)、平衡(-0.42;95% CI -0.75,-0.08)、阻力(-0.60;95% CI -0.89,-0.31)和包括耐力干预在内的感觉运动训练(-0.61;95% CI -0.95,-0.27)的比较显示出显著的效应大小:结论:平衡干预可改善帕金森病患者的平衡、姿势稳定性和一般活动能力。此外,替代运动、舞蹈、BWS 干预、阻力和感觉运动训练(包括和不包括耐力干预)也很有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year. Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy observation of combined transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on gait in 169 subacute stroke patients. Ambulation recovery prediction after hip fracture surgery using the Hip Fracture Short-Term Ambulation Prediction tool. Screening cutoff values to identify the risk of falls after stroke: A scoping review. Risk-taking behaviour and executive functions, a major component of the risk of fall factors after recent stroke. The effects of rehabilitation potential on activities of daily living in patients with stroke in Taiwan: a prospective longitudinal study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1