Is a severe preoperative condition a contraindication for aortic valve-sparing reimplantation in type A aortic dissection?

Joël Lapeze, Jacques Robin, Jean Ninet, Jean-François Obadia, Fadi Farhat
{"title":"Is a severe preoperative condition a contraindication for aortic valve-sparing reimplantation in type A aortic dissection?","authors":"Joël Lapeze, Jacques Robin, Jean Ninet, Jean-François Obadia, Fadi Farhat","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.24.12638-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) surgical management is still under debate. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of the aortic valve-sparing root reconstruction (AVSR) procedure in 92 consecutive patients operated for TAAD, even when preoperative condition was severe (malperfusion, shock or both).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our hospital database was reviewed to identify all patients who underwent an AVSR procedure for TAAD over 14 years. From May 2000 to June 2014, 92 consecutive patients were studied regarding to their preoperative condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age (61±13 years) and logistic Euroscore (23.4±15.3%) as well as cross-clamping (113±39 min), cardiopulmonary bypass (142±49 min) and circulatory arrest (22±13 min) times were collected. Hospital mortality was 16.3%. Mean follow-up was complete for a mean period of 27.6 months. One patient had early reoperation for aortic insufficiency. Actuarial survival at 1 year was 82.5%. The analysis of each group showed comparable mortality and morbidity in between patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based upon our experience in the management of TAAD, a reimplantation procedure could be performed regardless preoperative malperfusion or shock, with an acceptable postoperative over mortality or morbidity. A word of caution should be brought to patients over 70 years old.</p>","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"69-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.24.12638-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) surgical management is still under debate. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of the aortic valve-sparing root reconstruction (AVSR) procedure in 92 consecutive patients operated for TAAD, even when preoperative condition was severe (malperfusion, shock or both).

Methods: Our hospital database was reviewed to identify all patients who underwent an AVSR procedure for TAAD over 14 years. From May 2000 to June 2014, 92 consecutive patients were studied regarding to their preoperative condition.

Results: Age (61±13 years) and logistic Euroscore (23.4±15.3%) as well as cross-clamping (113±39 min), cardiopulmonary bypass (142±49 min) and circulatory arrest (22±13 min) times were collected. Hospital mortality was 16.3%. Mean follow-up was complete for a mean period of 27.6 months. One patient had early reoperation for aortic insufficiency. Actuarial survival at 1 year was 82.5%. The analysis of each group showed comparable mortality and morbidity in between patients.

Conclusions: Based upon our experience in the management of TAAD, a reimplantation procedure could be performed regardless preoperative malperfusion or shock, with an acceptable postoperative over mortality or morbidity. A word of caution should be brought to patients over 70 years old.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A 型主动脉夹层患者术前病情严重是否是主动脉瓣保留再植术的禁忌症?
背景:A 型主动脉夹层(TAAD)的手术治疗仍存在争议。本研究旨在证明在 92 例连续接受主动脉瓣根部重建术(AVSR)的 TAAD 患者中,即使术前情况严重(灌注不良、休克或两者兼有),主动脉瓣根部重建术的可行性和安全性:我们对医院数据库进行了审查,以确定 14 年来因 TAAD 而接受 AVSR 手术的所有患者。结果:年龄(61±13 岁)、血压、心率、血氧饱和度、心率、血氧饱和度、血氧饱和度、血氧饱和度、血氧饱和度、血氧饱和度、血氧饱和度、血氧饱和度、血氧饱和度、血氧饱和度结果:收集了年龄(61±13 岁)、Logistic Euroscore(23.4±15.3%)、交叉钳夹时间(113±39 分钟)、心肺旁路时间(142±49 分钟)和循环停止时间(22±13 分钟)。住院死亡率为 16.3%。平均随访时间为 27.6 个月。一名患者因主动脉瓣关闭不全而提前再次手术。1年的精算存活率为82.5%。对每组患者的分析表明,他们的死亡率和发病率相当:根据我们治疗 TAAD 的经验,无论术前有无灌注不良或休克,都可以进行再植手术,术后死亡率或发病率均可接受。需要提醒的是,70 岁以上的患者要慎重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Systematic review and meta-analysis on the incidence and prognosis of sac regression after endovascular aneurysm repair. Operative time and outcome after carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. Surgical thrombus removal in acute pulmonary embolism. Where do we stand today? Device dislodgement in ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm: the case for early surgical conversion. Risk stratification in pulmonary embolism: current evidence and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1