A comprehensive framework for landslide risk assessment of archaeological sites in Gujarat, India

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ejrs.2024.01.002
Haritha Kadapa
{"title":"A comprehensive framework for landslide risk assessment of archaeological sites in Gujarat, India","authors":"Haritha Kadapa","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrs.2024.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Landslides, even shallow ones, can displace and destroy the fragile archaeological record. Therefore, it is essential to develop a comprehensive risk assessment and predict the sites at risk before a disaster, which this study aims to provide for 508 archaeological sites associated with Indus civilization and regional Chalcolithic cultures in Gujarat, India. As a hazard inventory for the study area is not available, this study integrates multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), satellite remote sensing, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) first to generate a landslide susceptibility map and then to use it for assessing the landslide risk of archaeological sites. Fifteen parameters, viz., elevation, slope, aspect, curvature, average rainfall, drainage density, Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Stream Power Index (SPI), lithology, soil type, geomorphology, distance from lineaments, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Land Use Land Cover (LULC), and distance from roads were selected to determine susceptibility. The weights of each parameter were derived using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The novelty of this study lies in the spatial overlay of the area of the sites and landslide susceptibility to measure the value loss of the archaeological sites. The results revealed that three of the 508 sites studied are at high risk, and 214 are at medium risk of landslides. With this proposed methodology, this study generates a new dataset on landslide susceptibility for the study area. In addition, it attempts to provide an integrated risk assessment framework for the archaeological sites in India that aids in identifying and mitigating risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110982324000024/pdfft?md5=0c4950b768128efca5e9042488a6e09d&pid=1-s2.0-S1110982324000024-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110982324000024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Landslides, even shallow ones, can displace and destroy the fragile archaeological record. Therefore, it is essential to develop a comprehensive risk assessment and predict the sites at risk before a disaster, which this study aims to provide for 508 archaeological sites associated with Indus civilization and regional Chalcolithic cultures in Gujarat, India. As a hazard inventory for the study area is not available, this study integrates multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), satellite remote sensing, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) first to generate a landslide susceptibility map and then to use it for assessing the landslide risk of archaeological sites. Fifteen parameters, viz., elevation, slope, aspect, curvature, average rainfall, drainage density, Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Stream Power Index (SPI), lithology, soil type, geomorphology, distance from lineaments, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Land Use Land Cover (LULC), and distance from roads were selected to determine susceptibility. The weights of each parameter were derived using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The novelty of this study lies in the spatial overlay of the area of the sites and landslide susceptibility to measure the value loss of the archaeological sites. The results revealed that three of the 508 sites studied are at high risk, and 214 are at medium risk of landslides. With this proposed methodology, this study generates a new dataset on landslide susceptibility for the study area. In addition, it attempts to provide an integrated risk assessment framework for the archaeological sites in India that aids in identifying and mitigating risks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度古吉拉特考古遗址滑坡风险评估综合框架
山体滑坡,即使是浅层滑坡,也会使脆弱的考古记录移位和毁坏。因此,必须制定全面的风险评估,并在灾害发生前预测面临风险的遗址,本研究旨在为印度古吉拉特邦与印度河文明和地区性的旧石器文化相关的 508 个考古遗址提供这样的评估。由于没有研究地区的灾害清单,本研究首先整合了多重标准决策(MCDM)、卫星遥感和地理信息系统(GIS),生成滑坡易发性地图,然后利用该地图评估考古遗址的滑坡风险。为确定易滑坡性,选择了 15 个参数,即海拔、坡度、坡向、曲率、平均降雨量、排水密度、地形湿润指数 (TWI)、溪流动力指数 (SPI)、岩性、土壤类型、地貌、与线状物的距离、归一化差异植被指数 (NDVI)、土地利用土地覆盖 (LULC) 和与道路的距离。每个参数的权重都是通过层次分析法(AHP)得出的。本研究的新颖之处在于将遗址面积与滑坡易发性进行空间叠加,以衡量考古遗址的价值损失。研究结果表明,在所研究的 508 处遗址中,有 3 处处于高风险状态,214 处处于中度滑坡风险状态。这项研究利用所提出的方法,为研究区域生成了一个新的滑坡易发性数据集。此外,它还试图为印度考古遗址提供一个综合风险评估框架,以帮助识别和减轻风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1