Building MLR, ANN and FL models to predict the strength of problematic clayey soil stabilized with a combination of nano lime and nano pozzolan of natural sources for pavement construction

IF 2.6 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL International Journal of Geo-Engineering Pub Date : 2024-02-03 DOI:10.1186/s40703-023-00201-1
Aref M. Al-Swaidani, Ayman Meziab, Waed T. Khwies, Mohamad Al-Bali, Tarek Lala
{"title":"Building MLR, ANN and FL models to predict the strength of problematic clayey soil stabilized with a combination of nano lime and nano pozzolan of natural sources for pavement construction","authors":"Aref M. Al-Swaidani, Ayman Meziab, Waed T. Khwies, Mohamad Al-Bali, Tarek Lala","doi":"10.1186/s40703-023-00201-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current study aims at predicting the strength of the problematic clayey soils treated with combinations of pozzolan of natural sources and lime powder when added as soil additives at a nano scale. Multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural networks (ANN) and fuzzy logic (FL) tools were employed in the analytical study. The variables of the present study include the following: nano pozzoaln of natural source (NNP) content, nano lime content (NL), median particle size of NNP, active silica content of NNP (SiO<sub>2active</sub>), Initial liquid limit (ILL) and initial plastic limit (IPL) of the investigated soils. NNP was added at five percentages, i.e. 0%, 0.5%, 1%, 1.5% and 2%, while NL was added at five percentages, i.e. 0%, 0.3%, 0.6%, 0.9% and 1.2%. Three median particle sizes namely 50, 100 and 500 nm size were studied. Based on the different investigated soils and combinations, 120 soil mixtures were prepared and tested. California bearing ratio (CBR) and plasticity index (PI) were particularly examined. CBR tests were conducted at a soaked condition on specimens compacted to a maximum dry density (MDD) at the optimum moisture content (OMC). PI values were obtained following the Atterberg limits test. Based on the results of the performance criteria of the developed predictive models, it can be concluded that the CBR and PI of the expansive clayey soils can be effectively predicted using ANN and FL techniques. The results obtained by MLR were far from those obtained by both ANN &amp; FL. In addition, ANN tool was slightly more accurate than FL as far as prediction of CBR and PI is concerned. The higher capability of ANN &amp; FL models in predicting CBR &amp; PI values, which generally obtained through time-consuming and expensive tests, could be useful for geotechnical engineers to assess or design a new pavement project. Further, it is recommended to do a re-evaluation of the current study in future, particularly when more data is available in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":44851,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geo-Engineering","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geo-Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-023-00201-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study aims at predicting the strength of the problematic clayey soils treated with combinations of pozzolan of natural sources and lime powder when added as soil additives at a nano scale. Multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural networks (ANN) and fuzzy logic (FL) tools were employed in the analytical study. The variables of the present study include the following: nano pozzoaln of natural source (NNP) content, nano lime content (NL), median particle size of NNP, active silica content of NNP (SiO2active), Initial liquid limit (ILL) and initial plastic limit (IPL) of the investigated soils. NNP was added at five percentages, i.e. 0%, 0.5%, 1%, 1.5% and 2%, while NL was added at five percentages, i.e. 0%, 0.3%, 0.6%, 0.9% and 1.2%. Three median particle sizes namely 50, 100 and 500 nm size were studied. Based on the different investigated soils and combinations, 120 soil mixtures were prepared and tested. California bearing ratio (CBR) and plasticity index (PI) were particularly examined. CBR tests were conducted at a soaked condition on specimens compacted to a maximum dry density (MDD) at the optimum moisture content (OMC). PI values were obtained following the Atterberg limits test. Based on the results of the performance criteria of the developed predictive models, it can be concluded that the CBR and PI of the expansive clayey soils can be effectively predicted using ANN and FL techniques. The results obtained by MLR were far from those obtained by both ANN & FL. In addition, ANN tool was slightly more accurate than FL as far as prediction of CBR and PI is concerned. The higher capability of ANN & FL models in predicting CBR & PI values, which generally obtained through time-consuming and expensive tests, could be useful for geotechnical engineers to assess or design a new pavement project. Further, it is recommended to do a re-evaluation of the current study in future, particularly when more data is available in the literature.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立 MLR、ANN 和 FL 模型,预测使用天然来源的纳米石灰和纳米沸石组合稳定的问题粘性土的强度,用于路面建设
本研究的目的是预测在纳米级土壤添加剂中加入天然来源的水青石和石灰粉组合处理的问题粘性土壤的强度。分析研究采用了多元线性回归(MLR)、人工神经网络(ANN)和模糊逻辑(FL)工具。本研究的变量包括:天然来源的纳米石灰粉(NNP)含量、纳米石灰含量(NL)、NNP 的中值粒径、NNP 的活性二氧化硅含量(SiO2active)、调查土壤的初始液限(ILL)和初始塑限(IPL)。NNP 的添加比例为 0%、0.5%、1%、1.5% 和 2%,而 NL 的添加比例为 0%、0.3%、0.6%、0.9% 和 1.2%。研究了三种中值粒径,即 50、100 和 500 nm。根据不同的研究土壤和组合,制备并测试了 120 种土壤混合物。其中特别考察了加州承载比(CBR)和塑性指数(PI)。CBR 测试是在最佳含水量(OMC)下,在浸泡状态下对压实至最大干密度(MDD)的试样进行的。PI 值是根据阿特伯格极限试验得出的。根据所开发预测模型的性能标准结果,可以得出结论:使用 ANN 和 FL 技术可以有效预测膨胀性粘性土的 CBR 和 PI。用 MLR 得出的结果与 ANN 和 FL 得出的结果相差甚远。此外,就预测 CBR 和 PI 而言,ANN 工具的准确性略高于 FL。ANN & FL 模型预测 CBR & PI 值的能力较强,而这些值通常是通过耗时且昂贵的试验获得的,这对岩土工程师评估或设计新的路面项目非常有用。此外,建议今后对当前的研究进行重新评估,特别是当文献中提供更多数据时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Geo-Engineering
International Journal of Geo-Engineering ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Enhancing marl soil stability: nanosilica’s role in mitigating ettringite formation A fungus-based soil improvement using Rhizopus oryzae inoculum ANN-based evaluation system for erosion resistant highway shoulder rocks A neural network approach for the reliability analysis on failure of shallow foundations on cohesive soils Exploring the viability of Bentonite-amended blends incorporating marble dust, sand, and fly ash for the creation of an environmentally sustainable landfill liner system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1