Fertilization, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes after IVF, rescue ICSI, and ICSI in unexplained infertility: A retrospective study

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1002/mrd.23734
Fenglong Qiu, Yanghua Zuo, Huiying Xue, Rongxue Zhang
{"title":"Fertilization, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes after IVF, rescue ICSI, and ICSI in unexplained infertility: A retrospective study","authors":"Fenglong Qiu,&nbsp;Yanghua Zuo,&nbsp;Huiying Xue,&nbsp;Rongxue Zhang","doi":"10.1002/mrd.23734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is not recommended for nonmale infertile patients to avoid fertilization failure (FF) in view of controversies regarding safety issues. Among the strategies that may help to promote the use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) for women with a high risk of FF, rescue ICSI (R-ICSI) has attracted attention. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of short-term insemination combined with early R-ICSI in the treatment of unexplained infertility. A total of 952 controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycles for unexplained infertility were divided into short-term IVF (short-term insemination without R-ICSI, <i>n</i> = 500), R-ICSI (short-term insemination with R-ICSI, <i>n</i> = 141), and ICSI (conventional ICSI, <i>n</i> = 311) groups. Patients underwent consecutive transfer cycles until live birth, or until all embryos from the first COS cycle were used. Laboratory data and clinical outcomes from short-term IVF, R-ICSI, and ICSI groups were compared. Short-term IVF and ICSI groups were superior to R-ICSI group in polyspermy rate, available embryo rate, and top-quality embryos rate. Short-term IVF, R-ICSI, and ICSI groups underwent 705 (500 fresh and 205 frozen-thawed cycles), 190 (141 fresh and 49 frozen-thawed cycles), and 445 (311 fresh and 134 frozen-thawed cycles) transfer cycles, resulting in 294, 76, and 190 live birth cycles, respectively. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes among these three groups demonstrated similar clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. There was no significant difference in the cumulative live birth rate among these three groups. R-ICSI group showed similar neonatal outcomes compared with short-term IVF and ICSI groups, including the rates of low birth weight, fetal macrosomia, small for gestational age and large for gestational age. Short-term insemination combined with early R-ICSI achieved satisfactory pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, albeit with a high polyspermy rate, which was an effective alternative to avoid excessive use of ICSI in unexplained infertility.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mrd.23734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is not recommended for nonmale infertile patients to avoid fertilization failure (FF) in view of controversies regarding safety issues. Among the strategies that may help to promote the use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) for women with a high risk of FF, rescue ICSI (R-ICSI) has attracted attention. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of short-term insemination combined with early R-ICSI in the treatment of unexplained infertility. A total of 952 controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycles for unexplained infertility were divided into short-term IVF (short-term insemination without R-ICSI, n = 500), R-ICSI (short-term insemination with R-ICSI, n = 141), and ICSI (conventional ICSI, n = 311) groups. Patients underwent consecutive transfer cycles until live birth, or until all embryos from the first COS cycle were used. Laboratory data and clinical outcomes from short-term IVF, R-ICSI, and ICSI groups were compared. Short-term IVF and ICSI groups were superior to R-ICSI group in polyspermy rate, available embryo rate, and top-quality embryos rate. Short-term IVF, R-ICSI, and ICSI groups underwent 705 (500 fresh and 205 frozen-thawed cycles), 190 (141 fresh and 49 frozen-thawed cycles), and 445 (311 fresh and 134 frozen-thawed cycles) transfer cycles, resulting in 294, 76, and 190 live birth cycles, respectively. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes among these three groups demonstrated similar clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. There was no significant difference in the cumulative live birth rate among these three groups. R-ICSI group showed similar neonatal outcomes compared with short-term IVF and ICSI groups, including the rates of low birth weight, fetal macrosomia, small for gestational age and large for gestational age. Short-term insemination combined with early R-ICSI achieved satisfactory pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, albeit with a high polyspermy rate, which was an effective alternative to avoid excessive use of ICSI in unexplained infertility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不明原因不孕症患者进行体外受精、抢救性卵胞浆内单精子显微注射和卵胞浆内单精子显微注射后的受精、妊娠和新生儿结局:回顾性研究
鉴于对安全性问题的争议,不建议非男性不育患者采用传统的卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)来避免受精失败(FF)。在有助于促进高受精失败风险妇女使用体外受精(IVF)的策略中,抢救性卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(R-ICSI)备受关注。本研究旨在评估短期人工授精联合早期R-ICSI治疗不明原因不孕症的疗效。共有952例不明原因不孕症的控制性卵巢刺激(COS)周期患者被分为短期IVF组(无R-ICSI的短期人工授精,n = 500)、R-ICSI组(有R-ICSI的短期人工授精,n = 141)和ICSI组(常规ICSI,n = 311)。患者接受连续的移植周期,直至活产或使用完第一个 COS 周期的所有胚胎。比较了短期试管婴儿组、R-ICSI 组和 ICSI 组的实验室数据和临床结果。短期体外受精组和卵胞浆内单精子显微注射组在多胚胎率、可用胚胎率和优质胚胎率方面均优于卵胞浆内单精子显微注射组。短期试管婴儿组、R-ICSI 组和 ICSI 组分别进行了 705 个(500 个新鲜周期和 205 个冷冻-解冻周期)、190 个(141 个新鲜周期和 49 个冷冻-解冻周期)和 445 个(311 个新鲜周期和 134 个冷冻-解冻周期)移植周期,结果分别产生了 294 个、76 个和 190 个活产周期。对这三组妊娠结果的比较显示,新鲜和冷冻解冻胚胎移植周期的临床妊娠率和活产率相似。三组的累积活产率没有明显差异。与短期试管婴儿和卵胞浆内单精子显微注射组相比,R-ICSI 组显示出相似的新生儿结局,包括低出生体重率、胎儿巨大儿率、胎龄小率和胎龄大率。尽管多胎畸形率较高,但短期人工授精结合早期R-ICSI取得了令人满意的妊娠和新生儿结局,这是在不明原因不孕症中避免过度使用ICSI的有效替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1