CD, or not CD, that is the question: a digital interobserver agreement study in coeliac disease

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY BMJ Open Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001252
James Denholm, Benjamin A Schreiber, Florian Jaeckle, Mike N Wicks, Emyr W Benbow, Tim S Bracey, James Y H Chan, Lorant Farkas, Eve Fryer, Kishore Gopalakrishnan, Caroline A Hughes, Kathryn J Kirkwood, Gerald Langman, Betania Mahler-Araujo, Raymond F T McMahon, Khun La Win Myint, Sonali Natu, Andrew Robinson, Ashraf Sanduka, Katharine A Sheppard, Yee Wah Tsang, Mark J Arends, Elizabeth J Soilleux
{"title":"CD, or not CD, that is the question: a digital interobserver agreement study in coeliac disease","authors":"James Denholm, Benjamin A Schreiber, Florian Jaeckle, Mike N Wicks, Emyr W Benbow, Tim S Bracey, James Y H Chan, Lorant Farkas, Eve Fryer, Kishore Gopalakrishnan, Caroline A Hughes, Kathryn J Kirkwood, Gerald Langman, Betania Mahler-Araujo, Raymond F T McMahon, Khun La Win Myint, Sonali Natu, Andrew Robinson, Ashraf Sanduka, Katharine A Sheppard, Yee Wah Tsang, Mark J Arends, Elizabeth J Soilleux","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Coeliac disease (CD) diagnosis generally depends on histological examination of duodenal biopsies. We present the first study analysing the concordance in examination of duodenal biopsies using digitised whole-slide images (WSIs). We further investigate whether the inclusion of immunoglobulin A tissue transglutaminase (IgA tTG) and haemoglobin (Hb) data improves the interobserver agreement of diagnosis. Design We undertook a large study of the concordance in histological examination of duodenal biopsies using digitised WSIs in an entirely virtual reporting setting. Our study was organised in two phases: in phase 1, 13 pathologists independently classified 100 duodenal biopsies (40 normal; 40 CD; 20 indeterminate enteropathy) in the absence of any clinical or laboratory data. In phase 2, the same pathologists examined the (re-anonymised) WSIs with the inclusion of IgA tTG and Hb data. Results We found the mean probability of two observers agreeing in the absence of additional data to be 0.73 (±0.08) with a corresponding Cohen’s kappa of 0.59 (±0.11). We further showed that the inclusion of additional data increased the concordance to 0.80 (±0.06) with a Cohen’s kappa coefficient of 0.67 (±0.09). Conclusion We showed that the addition of serological data significantly improves the quality of CD diagnosis. However, the limited interobserver agreement in CD diagnosis using digitised WSIs, even after the inclusion of IgA tTG and Hb data, indicates the importance of interpreting duodenal biopsy in the appropriate clinical context. It further highlights the unmet need for an objective means of reproducible duodenal biopsy diagnosis, such as the automated analysis of WSIs using artificial intelligence. No data are available. The raw data, along with the code and instructions for reproducing all of the analysis and figures presented in this work are available in THIS GITLAB REPOSITORY (<https://gitlab.developers.cam.ac.uk/path/soilleux/soilleux-group/cd-inter-observer-agreement>). We are not at liberty to share the WSIs, however.","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"299 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Coeliac disease (CD) diagnosis generally depends on histological examination of duodenal biopsies. We present the first study analysing the concordance in examination of duodenal biopsies using digitised whole-slide images (WSIs). We further investigate whether the inclusion of immunoglobulin A tissue transglutaminase (IgA tTG) and haemoglobin (Hb) data improves the interobserver agreement of diagnosis. Design We undertook a large study of the concordance in histological examination of duodenal biopsies using digitised WSIs in an entirely virtual reporting setting. Our study was organised in two phases: in phase 1, 13 pathologists independently classified 100 duodenal biopsies (40 normal; 40 CD; 20 indeterminate enteropathy) in the absence of any clinical or laboratory data. In phase 2, the same pathologists examined the (re-anonymised) WSIs with the inclusion of IgA tTG and Hb data. Results We found the mean probability of two observers agreeing in the absence of additional data to be 0.73 (±0.08) with a corresponding Cohen’s kappa of 0.59 (±0.11). We further showed that the inclusion of additional data increased the concordance to 0.80 (±0.06) with a Cohen’s kappa coefficient of 0.67 (±0.09). Conclusion We showed that the addition of serological data significantly improves the quality of CD diagnosis. However, the limited interobserver agreement in CD diagnosis using digitised WSIs, even after the inclusion of IgA tTG and Hb data, indicates the importance of interpreting duodenal biopsy in the appropriate clinical context. It further highlights the unmet need for an objective means of reproducible duodenal biopsy diagnosis, such as the automated analysis of WSIs using artificial intelligence. No data are available. The raw data, along with the code and instructions for reproducing all of the analysis and figures presented in this work are available in THIS GITLAB REPOSITORY (). We are not at liberty to share the WSIs, however.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是 CD,还是不是 CD,这就是问题所在:一项关于乳糜泻的数字观察者间一致性研究
目的:乳糜泻(CD)的诊断通常取决于十二指肠活检组织学检查。我们首次利用数字化全切片图像(WSI)对十二指肠活检组织检查的一致性进行了分析。我们还进一步研究了加入免疫球蛋白 A 组织转谷氨酰胺酶(IgA tTG)和血红蛋白(Hb)数据是否能提高观察者之间的诊断一致性。设计 我们在完全虚拟的报告环境中使用数字化 WSI 对十二指肠活检组织学检查的一致性进行了一项大型研究。我们的研究分为两个阶段:在第一阶段,13 位病理学家在没有任何临床或实验室数据的情况下独立对 100 例十二指肠活检组织(40 例正常;40 例 CD;20 例不确定肠病)进行了分类。在第 2 阶段,同样的病理学家在加入 IgA tTG 和 Hb 数据后检查了(重新匿名的)WSI。结果 我们发现,在没有额外数据的情况下,两名观察者达成一致的平均概率为 0.73 (±0.08),相应的 Cohen's kappa 为 0.59 (±0.11)。我们进一步发现,加入额外数据后,一致性提高到 0.80 (±0.06),科恩卡帕系数为 0.67 (±0.09)。结论 我们的研究表明,加入血清学数据可显著提高 CD 诊断的质量。然而,即使在加入 IgA tTG 和 Hb 数据后,使用数字化 WSI 诊断 CD 的观察者间一致性仍然有限,这表明在适当的临床背景下解释十二指肠活检的重要性。这进一步凸显了对可重复十二指肠活检诊断客观方法的需求尚未得到满足,例如使用人工智能对 WSI 进行自动分析。无数据可用。原始数据、代码以及重现所有分析和图表的说明均可在本 GITLAB REPOSITORY () 中获取。不过,我们不能随意分享 WSI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Predictors for colectomy in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Qualitative service evaluation of a multimodal pilot service for early detection of liver disease in high-risk groups: 'Alright My Liver?' Development of a nomogram for predicting pancreatic portal hypertension in patients with acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study. Exploring the feasibility of home-delivered capsule endoscopy with 5G support: innovations and carbon footprint insights. Mixed-method Irish study exploring the role of diet in IBD based on an online questionnaire and a patient panel opinion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1