Assessing quadriceps strength in patellofemoral pain patients: A study on the reliability and validity of a low-cost load-cell for clinical practice

Germari Deysel, Mariaan van Aswegen, Mark Kramer
{"title":"Assessing quadriceps strength in patellofemoral pain patients: A study on the reliability and validity of a low-cost load-cell for clinical practice","authors":"Germari Deysel, Mariaan van Aswegen, Mark Kramer","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.01.24301977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nPatellofemoral pain (PFP) is a common knee complaint affecting diverse populations both acutely and chronically. Quadriceps muscle weakness is one possible aetiology, but current devices for measuring muscle strength (isokinetic dynamometer and hand-held dynamometers) are frequently too expensive for practitioners, especially in under-resourced settings. There is a need to evaluate a low-cost device to manage rehabilitation of people with PFP.\nMethods\nIsometric quadriceps strength of participants aged 18-35 years (total [n = 33], control group [n = 17] and PFP group [n = 16]) were evaluated on an isokinetic dynamometer and a low-cost load cell at baseline and after an 8-week non-standardised intervention for validity scores. Results\nThe load cell showed high absolute and relative reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89-0.99; typical error of measurement = 3.9-10.4%). Clinically meaningful difference scores (12.2-45 Nm) were greater than the typical error of measurement, implying sufficient sensitivity of the load cell to measure true changes in isometric quadricep strength. Strong to very strong correlations were evident between the load cell and isokinetic dynamometer torque measurements (r = 0.88-0.90, SEE = 0.05-0.07 Nm), but slope values (β = 0.65-0.77) indicated that torque from the load cell was typically lower than that obtained from the isokinetic dynamometer. An average systematic bias of 16.3-28.8 Nm was evident in favour of the isokinetic dynamometer, with no statistically significant between-group differences being noted between the baseline and follow-up testing.\nConclusion\nThe load cell is a reliable instrument, sensitive enough to detect clinically meaningful differences in quadriceps strength in healthy individuals and those with PFP. The load cell lacks validity and cannot replace isokinetic dynamometry. Given the low cost and excellent reliability, the load cell can be a valuable tool to assess quadriceps muscle deficits and track rehabilitation progress in people with PFP.","PeriodicalId":501453,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.01.24301977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a common knee complaint affecting diverse populations both acutely and chronically. Quadriceps muscle weakness is one possible aetiology, but current devices for measuring muscle strength (isokinetic dynamometer and hand-held dynamometers) are frequently too expensive for practitioners, especially in under-resourced settings. There is a need to evaluate a low-cost device to manage rehabilitation of people with PFP. Methods Isometric quadriceps strength of participants aged 18-35 years (total [n = 33], control group [n = 17] and PFP group [n = 16]) were evaluated on an isokinetic dynamometer and a low-cost load cell at baseline and after an 8-week non-standardised intervention for validity scores. Results The load cell showed high absolute and relative reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89-0.99; typical error of measurement = 3.9-10.4%). Clinically meaningful difference scores (12.2-45 Nm) were greater than the typical error of measurement, implying sufficient sensitivity of the load cell to measure true changes in isometric quadricep strength. Strong to very strong correlations were evident between the load cell and isokinetic dynamometer torque measurements (r = 0.88-0.90, SEE = 0.05-0.07 Nm), but slope values (β = 0.65-0.77) indicated that torque from the load cell was typically lower than that obtained from the isokinetic dynamometer. An average systematic bias of 16.3-28.8 Nm was evident in favour of the isokinetic dynamometer, with no statistically significant between-group differences being noted between the baseline and follow-up testing. Conclusion The load cell is a reliable instrument, sensitive enough to detect clinically meaningful differences in quadriceps strength in healthy individuals and those with PFP. The load cell lacks validity and cannot replace isokinetic dynamometry. Given the low cost and excellent reliability, the load cell can be a valuable tool to assess quadriceps muscle deficits and track rehabilitation progress in people with PFP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估髌骨股骨痛患者的股四头肌力量:一项关于用于临床实践的低成本称重传感器可靠性和有效性的研究
背景髌骨股骨痛(PFP)是一种常见的膝关节疾病,对不同人群都有急性和慢性影响。股四头肌无力是一种可能的病因,但目前测量肌肉力量的设备(等动测力计和手持式测力计)对于从业人员来说往往过于昂贵,尤其是在资源不足的环境中。方法使用等速测力计和低成本的称重传感器对 18-35 岁参与者(总计 [n = 33]、对照组 [n = 17] 和 PFP 组 [n = 16])的股四头肌肌力进行评估,并在基线和 8 周非标准化干预后进行有效性评分。结果称重传感器显示出较高的绝对和相对可靠性(类内相关系数 = 0.89-0.99;典型测量误差 = 3.9-10.4%)。有临床意义的差异分数(12.2-45 牛米)大于典型测量误差,这意味着称重传感器具有足够的灵敏度来测量等长股四头肌力量的真实变化。称重传感器和等动式测力计的扭矩测量值(r = 0.88-0.90,SEE = 0.05-0.07牛米)之间存在明显的强至极强相关性,但斜率值(β = 0.65-0.77)表明称重传感器测量的扭矩通常低于等动式测力计测量的扭矩。结论称重传感器是一种可靠的仪器,其灵敏度足以检测出健康人和 PFP 患者股四头肌力量中具有临床意义的差异。称重传感器缺乏有效性,不能取代等速肌力测定法。鉴于其低廉的成本和出色的可靠性,称重传感器可以成为评估股四头肌缺陷和跟踪 PFP 患者康复进展的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS: INTERPRETATION OF NON-STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT RESULTS IN RANDOMISED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS IN REHABILITATION Targeted deep brain stimulation of the motor thalamus improves speech and swallowing motor functions after cerebral lesions Normal feeding movements expressed by dimensionality reduction of whole-body joint motions using principal component analysis Impact of early postoperative ambulation on gait recovery after hip fracture surgery: A multicenter cohort study Backward Locomotor Treadmill Training on Walking and Balance Outcomes in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1