Long-term aspirin adherence following myocardial infarction and risk of cardiovascular events.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae009
Anna Meta Dyrvig Kristensen, Manan Pareek, Kristian Hay Kragholm, John William McEvoy, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Eva Bossano Prescott
{"title":"Long-term aspirin adherence following myocardial infarction and risk of cardiovascular events.","authors":"Anna Meta Dyrvig Kristensen, Manan Pareek, Kristian Hay Kragholm, John William McEvoy, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Eva Bossano Prescott","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Aspirin is considered mandatory after myocardial infarction (MI). However, its long-term efficacy has been questioned. This study investigated the effectiveness of long-term aspirin after MI.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients ≥40 years with MI from 2004 to 2017 who were adherent to aspirin 1 year after MI were included from Danish nationwide registries. At 2, 4, 6, and 8 years after MI, continued adherence to aspirin was evaluated. Absolute and relative risks of MI, stroke, or death at 2 years from each time point were calculated using multivariable logistic regression analysis with average treatment effect modelling standardized for age, sex, and comorbidities. Subgroup analyses were stratified by sex and age > and ≤65 years. Among 40 116 individuals included, the risk of the composite endpoint was significantly higher for non-adherent patients at all time points. The absolute risk was highest at 2-4 years after MI for both adherent [8.34%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.05-8.64%] and non-adherent patients (10.72%, 95% CI: 9.78-11.66%). The relative risk associated with non-adherence decreased from 4 years after index-MI and onwards: 1.41 (95% CI: 1.27-1.55) at 4-6 years and 1.21 (95% CI: 1.06-1.36) at 8-10 years (Ptrend = 0.056). Aspirin non-adherence in women and individuals >65 years was not associated with increased risk. Pinteraction at each of the time points: Age - <0.001, <0.001, 0.002, 0.51; Sex - 0.25, 0.02, 0.02, 0.82.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-adherence to long-term aspirin was associated with increased risk of MI, stroke, or death, but not in women or individuals >65 years. The risk decreased from 4 years after MI with near statistical significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"612-622"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Aspirin is considered mandatory after myocardial infarction (MI). However, its long-term efficacy has been questioned. This study investigated the effectiveness of long-term aspirin after MI.

Methods and results: Patients ≥40 years with MI from 2004 to 2017 who were adherent to aspirin 1 year after MI were included from Danish nationwide registries. At 2, 4, 6, and 8 years after MI, continued adherence to aspirin was evaluated. Absolute and relative risks of MI, stroke, or death at 2 years from each time point were calculated using multivariable logistic regression analysis with average treatment effect modelling standardized for age, sex, and comorbidities. Subgroup analyses were stratified by sex and age > and ≤65 years. Among 40 116 individuals included, the risk of the composite endpoint was significantly higher for non-adherent patients at all time points. The absolute risk was highest at 2-4 years after MI for both adherent [8.34%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.05-8.64%] and non-adherent patients (10.72%, 95% CI: 9.78-11.66%). The relative risk associated with non-adherence decreased from 4 years after index-MI and onwards: 1.41 (95% CI: 1.27-1.55) at 4-6 years and 1.21 (95% CI: 1.06-1.36) at 8-10 years (Ptrend = 0.056). Aspirin non-adherence in women and individuals >65 years was not associated with increased risk. Pinteraction at each of the time points: Age - <0.001, <0.001, 0.002, 0.51; Sex - 0.25, 0.02, 0.02, 0.82.

Conclusion: Non-adherence to long-term aspirin was associated with increased risk of MI, stroke, or death, but not in women or individuals >65 years. The risk decreased from 4 years after MI with near statistical significance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心肌梗死后长期服用阿司匹林与心血管事件风险。
背景和目的:阿司匹林被认为是心肌梗死(MI)后的必备药物。然而,阿司匹林的长期疗效一直受到质疑。本研究调查了心肌梗死后长期服用阿司匹林的有效性:2004-2017年期间,年龄≥40岁的心肌梗死患者在心肌梗死后一年内坚持服用阿司匹林。在心肌梗死后的 2、4、6 和 8 年,对是否继续坚持服用阿司匹林进行了评估。采用多变量逻辑回归分析法计算了每个时间点后 2 年的心肌梗死、中风或死亡的绝对风险和相对风险,并对年龄、性别和合并症进行了标准化的平均治疗效果建模。按性别和年龄大于或小于 65 岁进行了分组分析:结果:在纳入的 40 114 人中,不坚持治疗的患者在所有时间点的综合终点风险都明显较高。坚持治疗的患者(8.34%,95% 置信区间 [CI]:8.05-8.64%)和不坚持治疗的患者(10.72%,95% 置信区间:9.78-11.66%)在心肌梗死后 2-4 年的绝对风险最高。与不坚持治疗相关的相对风险从指数-MI 4 年后开始下降:4-6年为1.41(95% CI:1.27-1.55),8-10年为1.21(95% CI:1.06-1.36)(Ptrend = 0.056)。女性和 65 岁以上人群不坚持服用阿司匹林与风险增加无关。在每个时间点上都存在平特异性:年龄-结论:不坚持长期服用阿司匹林与心肌梗死、中风或死亡风险增加有关,但与女性或年龄大于 65 岁者无关。心肌梗死发生 4 年后风险降低,接近统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
期刊最新文献
Should we routinely measure patient quality of life after acute coronary syndrome? National health expenditure per capita is associated with CRT implantation practice: findings from the ESC CRT Survey II with 11 088 patients. Impact of intravascular ultrasound for coronary bifurcations treated with last generations stents: insights from the BIFURCAT-ULTRA registry. Treatment with PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies is associated with discontinuation of oral lipid lowering therapy. Quality indicators for improved cardiovascular care: learnings from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1