Rehabilitative effects of electrical stimulation on gait performance in stroke patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/NRE-230360
Sujin Hwang, Chiang-Soon Song
{"title":"Rehabilitative effects of electrical stimulation on gait performance in stroke patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Sujin Hwang, Chiang-Soon Song","doi":"10.3233/NRE-230360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electrical stimulation techniques are widely utilized for rehabilitation management in individuals with stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aims to summarize the rehabilitative effects of electrical stimulation therapy on gait performance in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review included randomized controlled trials (RCT) investigating the therapeutic effects of electrical stimulation in stroke patients throughout five databases. This review qualitatively synthesized 20 studies and quantitatively analyzed 11 RCTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Functional electrical stimulation (FES) was the most commonly used electrical stimulation type to improve postural stability and gait performance in stroke patients. The clinical measurement tools commonly used in the three studies to assess the therapeutic effects of FES were Berg balance scale (BBS), 10-meter walk test (10MWT), 6-minute walk test (6mWT), and gait velocity. The BBS score and gait velocity had positive effects in the FES group compared with the control group, but the 10MWT and 6mWT showed the same effects between the two groups. The heterogeneity of BBS scores was also high.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this review suggest that electrical stimulation shows little evidence of postural stability and gait performance in stroke patients, although some electrical stimulations showed positive effects on postural stability and gait performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-230360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electrical stimulation techniques are widely utilized for rehabilitation management in individuals with stroke patients.

Objectives: This review aims to summarize the rehabilitative effects of electrical stimulation therapy on gait performance in stroke patients.

Methods: This review included randomized controlled trials (RCT) investigating the therapeutic effects of electrical stimulation in stroke patients throughout five databases. This review qualitatively synthesized 20 studies and quantitatively analyzed 11 RCTs.

Results: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) was the most commonly used electrical stimulation type to improve postural stability and gait performance in stroke patients. The clinical measurement tools commonly used in the three studies to assess the therapeutic effects of FES were Berg balance scale (BBS), 10-meter walk test (10MWT), 6-minute walk test (6mWT), and gait velocity. The BBS score and gait velocity had positive effects in the FES group compared with the control group, but the 10MWT and 6mWT showed the same effects between the two groups. The heterogeneity of BBS scores was also high.

Conclusion: The results of this review suggest that electrical stimulation shows little evidence of postural stability and gait performance in stroke patients, although some electrical stimulations showed positive effects on postural stability and gait performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电刺激对中风患者步态表现的康复作用:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
背景:电刺激技术被广泛用于脑卒中患者的康复治疗:电刺激技术被广泛用于脑卒中患者的康复治疗:本综述旨在总结电刺激疗法对中风患者步态表现的康复效果:本综述包括五个数据库中调查电刺激对中风患者治疗效果的随机对照试验(RCT)。本综述对 20 项研究进行了定性综述,对 11 项随机对照试验进行了定量分析:结果:功能性电刺激(FES)是最常用的改善中风患者姿势稳定性和步态表现的电刺激类型。三项研究中常用于评估 FES 治疗效果的临床测量工具包括伯格平衡量表(BBS)、10 米步行测试(10MWT)、6 分钟步行测试(6mWT)和步速。与对照组相比,FES 组的 BBS 评分和步速具有积极效果,但 10 米步行测试和 6 分钟步行测试在两组之间显示出相同的效果。BBS 评分的异质性也很高:本综述的结果表明,虽然某些电刺激对脑卒中患者的姿势稳定性和步态表现有积极影响,但电刺激对脑卒中患者的姿势稳定性和步态表现几乎没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Attention and processing speed tests: Normative data for Spanish-Speaking adults in the United States. MDMA for treatment of PTSD and neurorehabilitation in military populations. Methodology for the generation of normative data for the U.S. adult Spanish-speaking population: A Bayesian approach. Newly developed neuropsychological norms for the evaluation of Spanish-speaking adults in the United States. Evaluation of YouTube videos as a source of information on facial paralysis exercises.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1