Phonetics–phonology mapping in the generalization of perceptual learning

IF 1.9 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Phonetics Pub Date : 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101295
Wei Lai , Meredith Tamminga
{"title":"Phonetics–phonology mapping in the generalization of perceptual learning","authors":"Wei Lai ,&nbsp;Meredith Tamminga","doi":"10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous studies on whether perceptual learning generalizes across multiple speakers have produced inconsistent results between generalization and speaker-specificity. A prior proposal is that the critical phonemes produced by two different speakers need to be phonetically similar for perceptual learning to generalize. To test this account, we investigated the perceptual generalization of sibilants across two pairs of speakers. In both cases, sibilants of the same male speaker were manipulated to induce either an /s/-favoring perceptual bias or an /ʃ/-favoring one in a training phase. We then examined whether the perceptual biases would generalize in a test phase to the /s/-/ʃ/ continua of two different female speakers, one resembling the training speaker and the other differing from the training speaker in the spectral frequency distributions of their sibilants. We found that generalization of perceptual learning occurred in both /s/-favoring and /ʃ/-favoring conditions between the speaker pair with similar sibilant productions. For the speaker pair with different sibilants, we found perceptual generalization in the /s/-favoring training condition but not in the /ʃ/-favoring condition, which is not predicted by the phonetic similarity account. To explain these unexpected results, we offer a novel phonetics–phonology mismatch account as a refinement of our understanding of when and why perceptual generalization might be blocked. The results shed light on the constant influence of the mapping between phonetics and phonology during the learning and generalization of phonetic variability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phonetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447024000019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies on whether perceptual learning generalizes across multiple speakers have produced inconsistent results between generalization and speaker-specificity. A prior proposal is that the critical phonemes produced by two different speakers need to be phonetically similar for perceptual learning to generalize. To test this account, we investigated the perceptual generalization of sibilants across two pairs of speakers. In both cases, sibilants of the same male speaker were manipulated to induce either an /s/-favoring perceptual bias or an /ʃ/-favoring one in a training phase. We then examined whether the perceptual biases would generalize in a test phase to the /s/-/ʃ/ continua of two different female speakers, one resembling the training speaker and the other differing from the training speaker in the spectral frequency distributions of their sibilants. We found that generalization of perceptual learning occurred in both /s/-favoring and /ʃ/-favoring conditions between the speaker pair with similar sibilant productions. For the speaker pair with different sibilants, we found perceptual generalization in the /s/-favoring training condition but not in the /ʃ/-favoring condition, which is not predicted by the phonetic similarity account. To explain these unexpected results, we offer a novel phonetics–phonology mismatch account as a refinement of our understanding of when and why perceptual generalization might be blocked. The results shed light on the constant influence of the mapping between phonetics and phonology during the learning and generalization of phonetic variability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感知学习泛化中的语音-音素映射
以往关于知觉学习是否能在多个说话者之间泛化的研究,在泛化和说话者特异性之间产生了不一致的结果。之前的一项提议是,两个不同说话者发出的关键音素必须在语音上相似,感知学习才能泛化。为了验证这一观点,我们研究了两对说话者对咝声母的感知泛化。在这两种情况下,同一男性说话者的咝声都会在训练阶段被操纵,以诱发/s/偏爱或/ʃ/偏爱的知觉偏差。然后,我们研究了在测试阶段感知偏差是否会泛化到两个不同女性说话者的/s/-/ʃ/连续音上,其中一个与训练说话者相似,另一个则在咝声的频谱频率分布上与训练说话者不同。我们发现,在/s/偏好和/ʃ/偏好条件下,感知学习的泛化发生在咝声发音相似的一对说话者之间。而对于发音咝声不同的一对说话者,我们发现在/s/偏好的训练条件下出现了知觉泛化,但在/ʃ/偏好的条件下却没有出现,这与语音相似性理论所预测的结果不符。为了解释这些出乎意料的结果,我们提出了一个新的语音-语调不匹配的解释,以完善我们对知觉泛化何时以及为何会受阻的理解。研究结果揭示了在语音变异的学习和泛化过程中,语音学和音系学之间的映射所产生的持续影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
26.30%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of Phonetics publishes papers of an experimental or theoretical nature that deal with phonetic aspects of language and linguistic communication processes. Papers dealing with technological and/or pathological topics, or papers of an interdisciplinary nature are also suitable, provided that linguistic-phonetic principles underlie the work reported. Regular articles, review articles, and letters to the editor are published. Themed issues are also published, devoted entirely to a specific subject of interest within the field of phonetics.
期刊最新文献
Talker variability versus variability of vowel context in training naïve learners on an unfamiliar class of foreign language contrasts Effects of syllable position and place of articulation on secondary dorsal contrasts: An ultrasound study of Irish On the target of phonetic convergence: Acoustic and linguistic aspects of pitch accent imitation Effects of word-level structure on oral stop realization in Hawaiian Lexically-guided perceptual recalibration from acoustically unambiguous input in second language learners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1