Research writing with ChatGPT: A descriptive embodied practice framework

Q1 Arts and Humanities Computers and Composition Pub Date : 2024-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102830
Stacey Pigg
{"title":"Research writing with ChatGPT: A descriptive embodied practice framework","authors":"Stacey Pigg","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research approaches that emphasize embodied practice and value the idiosyncratic uptake of writing technologies should be central to how writing researchers process the early moment of generative AI's availability to public audiences. Based on a qualitative analysis of 35 publicly available videos depicting the use of ChatGPT and Bing, the study offers a framework of descriptive codes that identify practices early adopters enact when integrating these technologies into research writing processes. The research contributes three key categories of practice that describe research writers’ interaction with generative AI across research design, writing research genres, and proofreading and editing: <em>requesting, evaluating</em>, and <em>refining</em>. This study is significant for providing an early descriptive analysis of the uptake of ChatGPT in research writing, while also identifying how disparate uses of generative AI technologies emerge from conflicting beliefs about writing, research, and invention. In particular, the study describes how experts in writing and research portray uses of and attitudes toward these technologies that often differ from students who are learning to research and write in their respective fields.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 102830"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461524000069/pdfft?md5=a5e337637caea208755dc6e247c71fc0&pid=1-s2.0-S8755461524000069-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Composition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461524000069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research approaches that emphasize embodied practice and value the idiosyncratic uptake of writing technologies should be central to how writing researchers process the early moment of generative AI's availability to public audiences. Based on a qualitative analysis of 35 publicly available videos depicting the use of ChatGPT and Bing, the study offers a framework of descriptive codes that identify practices early adopters enact when integrating these technologies into research writing processes. The research contributes three key categories of practice that describe research writers’ interaction with generative AI across research design, writing research genres, and proofreading and editing: requesting, evaluating, and refining. This study is significant for providing an early descriptive analysis of the uptake of ChatGPT in research writing, while also identifying how disparate uses of generative AI technologies emerge from conflicting beliefs about writing, research, and invention. In particular, the study describes how experts in writing and research portray uses of and attitudes toward these technologies that often differ from students who are learning to research and write in their respective fields.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 ChatGPT 进行研究写作:描述性体现实践框架
强调具体实践和重视写作技术特异性吸收的研究方法应该成为写作研究人员如何处理生成式人工智能向公众提供的早期时刻的核心。本研究基于对 35 个公开视频的定性分析,这些视频描述了 ChatGPT 和 Bing 的使用情况,研究提供了一个描述性代码框架,以确定早期采用者在将这些技术整合到研究写作过程中时所采取的做法。该研究提供了三个关键的实践类别,描述了研究写作者与生成式人工智能在研究设计、研究类型写作以及校对和编辑方面的互动:请求、评估和完善。这项研究的重要意义在于,它对研究写作中使用 ChatGPT 的情况进行了早期描述性分析,同时还确定了生成式人工智能技术的不同用途是如何从关于写作、研究和发明的相互冲突的信念中产生的。特别是,本研究描述了写作和研究领域的专家如何使用这些技术,以及他们对这些技术的态度如何与在各自领域学习研究和写作的学生不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Composition
Computers and Composition Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Composition: An International Journal is devoted to exploring the use of computers in writing classes, writing programs, and writing research. It provides a forum for discussing issues connected with writing and computer use. It also offers information about integrating computers into writing programs on the basis of sound theoretical and pedagogical decisions, and empirical evidence. It welcomes articles, reviews, and letters to the Editors that may be of interest to readers, including descriptions of computer-aided writing and/or reading instruction, discussions of topics related to computer use of software development; explorations of controversial ethical, legal, or social issues related to the use of computers in writing programs.
期刊最新文献
Preparing for a new paradigm: A mixed-methods study of student experience in on-site, hybrid, and online writing courses Integrating generative AI into digital multimodal composition: A study of multicultural second-language classrooms Purposeful remixing with generative AI: Constructing designer voice in multimodal composing Student use of generative AI as a composing process supplement: Concerns for intellectual property and academic honesty Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1