Situating language and music research in a domain-specific versus domain-general framework: A review of theoretical and empirical data

IF 2.8 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language and Linguistics Compass Pub Date : 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1111/lnc3.12509
Katerina Drakoulaki, Christina Anagnostopoulou, Maria Teresa Guasti, Barbara Tillmann, Spyridoula Varlokosta
{"title":"Situating language and music research in a domain-specific versus domain-general framework: A review of theoretical and empirical data","authors":"Katerina Drakoulaki,&nbsp;Christina Anagnostopoulou,&nbsp;Maria Teresa Guasti,&nbsp;Barbara Tillmann,&nbsp;Spyridoula Varlokosta","doi":"10.1111/lnc3.12509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While many theoretical proposals about the relationship between language and music processing have been proposed over the past 40 years, recent empirical advances have shed new light on this relationship. Many features are shared between language and music, inspiring research in the fields of linguistic theory, systematic musicology, and cognitive (neuro-)science. This research has led to many and diverse findings, making comparisons difficult. In the current review, we propose a framework within which to organise past research and conduct future research, suggesting that past research has assumed either domain-specificity or domain-generality for language and music. Domain-specific approaches theoretically and experimentally describe aspects of language and music processing assuming that there is shared (structure-building) processing. Domain-general approaches theoretically and experimentally describe how mechanisms such as cognitive control, attention or neural entrainment can explain language and music processing. Here we propose that combining elements from domain-specific and domain-general approaches can be beneficial for advances in theoretical and experimental work, as well as for diagnoses and interventions for atypical populations. We provide examples of past research which has implicitly merged domain-specific and domain-general assumptions, and suggest new experimental designs that can result from such a combination aiming to further our understanding of the human brain.</p>","PeriodicalId":47472,"journal":{"name":"Language and Linguistics Compass","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lnc3.12509","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Linguistics Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lnc3.12509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While many theoretical proposals about the relationship between language and music processing have been proposed over the past 40 years, recent empirical advances have shed new light on this relationship. Many features are shared between language and music, inspiring research in the fields of linguistic theory, systematic musicology, and cognitive (neuro-)science. This research has led to many and diverse findings, making comparisons difficult. In the current review, we propose a framework within which to organise past research and conduct future research, suggesting that past research has assumed either domain-specificity or domain-generality for language and music. Domain-specific approaches theoretically and experimentally describe aspects of language and music processing assuming that there is shared (structure-building) processing. Domain-general approaches theoretically and experimentally describe how mechanisms such as cognitive control, attention or neural entrainment can explain language and music processing. Here we propose that combining elements from domain-specific and domain-general approaches can be beneficial for advances in theoretical and experimental work, as well as for diagnoses and interventions for atypical populations. We provide examples of past research which has implicitly merged domain-specific and domain-general assumptions, and suggest new experimental designs that can result from such a combination aiming to further our understanding of the human brain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将语言和音乐研究置于特定领域与一般领域的框架中:理论和经验数据回顾
在过去的 40 年中,人们提出了许多关于语言和音乐处理之间关系的理论建议,而最近的实证研究进展则为这一关系带来了新的启示。语言和音乐之间有许多共同特征,激发了语言理论、系统音乐学和认知(神经)科学领域的研究。这些研究成果多种多样,因此很难进行比较。在本综述中,我们提出了一个框架来组织过去的研究和开展未来的研究,并指出过去的研究要么假定语言和音乐具有特定领域性,要么假定语言和音乐具有一般领域性。特定领域方法从理论上和实验上描述了语言和音乐处理的各个方面,假定存在共同的(结构构建)处理过程。通用领域方法则从理论和实验上描述了认知控制、注意力或神经统合等机制如何解释语言和音乐处理过程。在此,我们建议将特定领域方法和一般领域方法的要素结合起来,这将有利于理论和实验工作的进展,以及对非典型人群的诊断和干预。我们举例说明了过去将特定领域假设和一般领域假设暗中结合起来的研究,并提出了新的实验设计方案,旨在通过这种结合进一步加深我们对人类大脑的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Language and Linguistics Compass
Language and Linguistics Compass LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Unique in its range, Language and Linguistics Compass is an online-only journal publishing original, peer-reviewed surveys of current research from across the entire discipline. Language and Linguistics Compass publishes state-of-the-art reviews, supported by a comprehensive bibliography and accessible to an international readership. Language and Linguistics Compass is aimed at senior undergraduates, postgraduates and academics, and will provide a unique reference tool for researching essays, preparing lectures, writing a research proposal, or just keeping up with new developments in a specific area of interest.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Truthmaker Semantics and Natural Language Semantics The Semantics and Expression of Apprehensional Modality The Roles of Neural Networks in Language Acquisition Challenges and Strategies for Acquiring Adjectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1