The effect of online company responses on app review quality

IF 2.7 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Consumer Marketing Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1108/jcm-06-2023-6098
Qiuli Su, Aidin Namin, Seth Ketron
{"title":"The effect of online company responses on app review quality","authors":"Qiuli Su, Aidin Namin, Seth Ketron","doi":"10.1108/jcm-06-2023-6098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to investigate textual characteristics of customer reviews that motivate companies to respond (sentiment negativity and sentiment deviation) and how aspects of these company responses (response intensity, length and tailoring) affect subsequent customer review quality (comprehensiveness and readability) over time.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Leveraging a large data set from a leading app website (Shopify), the authors combine text mining, natural language processing (NLP) and big data analysis to examine the antecedents and outcomes of online company responses to reviews.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>This study finds that companies are more likely to respond to reviews with more negative sentiment and higher sentiment deviation scores. Furthermore, while longer company responses improve review comprehensiveness over time, they do not have a significant influence on review readability; meanwhile, more tailored company responses improve readability but not comprehensiveness over time. In addition, the intensity (volume) of company responses does not affect subsequent review quality in either comprehensiveness or readability.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper expands on the understanding of online company responses within the digital marketplace – specifically, apps – and provides a new and broader perspective on the motivations and effects of online company responses to customer reviews. The study also extends beyond the short-term focus of prior works and adds to literature on long-term effects of online company responses to subsequent reviews. The findings provide valuable insights for companies (especially those with apps) to enhance their online communication strategies and customer engagement.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":35923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-06-2023-6098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to investigate textual characteristics of customer reviews that motivate companies to respond (sentiment negativity and sentiment deviation) and how aspects of these company responses (response intensity, length and tailoring) affect subsequent customer review quality (comprehensiveness and readability) over time.

Design/methodology/approach

Leveraging a large data set from a leading app website (Shopify), the authors combine text mining, natural language processing (NLP) and big data analysis to examine the antecedents and outcomes of online company responses to reviews.

Findings

This study finds that companies are more likely to respond to reviews with more negative sentiment and higher sentiment deviation scores. Furthermore, while longer company responses improve review comprehensiveness over time, they do not have a significant influence on review readability; meanwhile, more tailored company responses improve readability but not comprehensiveness over time. In addition, the intensity (volume) of company responses does not affect subsequent review quality in either comprehensiveness or readability.

Originality/value

This paper expands on the understanding of online company responses within the digital marketplace – specifically, apps – and provides a new and broader perspective on the motivations and effects of online company responses to customer reviews. The study also extends beyond the short-term focus of prior works and adds to literature on long-term effects of online company responses to subsequent reviews. The findings provide valuable insights for companies (especially those with apps) to enhance their online communication strategies and customer engagement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线公司回复对应用程序评论质量的影响
目的 本文旨在研究促使公司做出回应的客户评论的文本特征(情感负面性和情感偏差),以及这些公司回应的各个方面(回应强度、长度和定制)如何随着时间的推移影响后续的客户评论质量(全面性和可读性)。设计/方法/途径作者利用一个领先应用网站(Shopify)的大型数据集,结合文本挖掘、自然语言处理(NLP)和大数据分析,研究了在线公司对评论做出回应的前因后果。此外,随着时间的推移,较长的公司回复会提高评论的全面性,但对评论的可读性没有显著影响;同时,随着时间的推移,更有针对性的公司回复会提高可读性,但不会提高全面性。此外,公司回复的强度(数量)不会影响后续评论质量的全面性或可读性。 原创性/价值 本文拓展了人们对数字市场(特别是应用程序)中在线公司回复的理解,并为在线公司回复客户评论的动机和效果提供了一个新的、更广阔的视角。本研究还超越了以往研究的短期关注点,为有关在线公司对后续评论的长期影响的文献提供了补充。研究结果为公司(尤其是拥有应用程序的公司)提供了宝贵的见解,有助于他们加强在线沟通策略和客户参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Consumer Marketing
Journal of Consumer Marketing Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: ■Consumer behaviour ■Customer policy and service ■Practical case studies to illustrate concepts ■The latest thinking and research in marketing planning ■The marketing of services worldwide
期刊最新文献
Generation Z’s intention to use digital fashion items in the Metaverse Conspicuous compensatory consumption: scale development and initial validation The adoption of smart services: do privacy concerns, trust in benevolence and usage experience matter? In smartness we trust: consumer experience, smart device personalization and privacy balance Examining process mechanism of celebrity attributes on brand advocacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1