Determining whether biomechanical variables that describe common ‘safe lifting’ cues are associated with low back loads

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology Pub Date : 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2024.102867
Daniel P. Armstrong, Justin B. Davidson, Steven L. Fischer
{"title":"Determining whether biomechanical variables that describe common ‘safe lifting’ cues are associated with low back loads","authors":"Daniel P. Armstrong,&nbsp;Justin B. Davidson,&nbsp;Steven L. Fischer","doi":"10.1016/j.jelekin.2024.102867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lift technique training programs have been implemented to help reduce injury risk, but the underlying content validity of cues used within these programs is not clear. The objective of this study was to determine whether biomechanical variables, that commonly used lifting cues aim to elicit, are associated with resultant low back extensor moment exposures. A sample of 72 participants were recruited to perform 10 repetitions of a floor-to-waist height barbell lift while whole-body kinematics and ground reaction forces were collected. Kinematic, kinetic, and energetic variables representative of characteristics commonly targeted by lifting cues were calculated as predictor variables, while peak and cumulative low back moments were calculated as dependent measures. Multiple regression revealed that 56.6–59.2% of variance in low back moments was explained by predictor variables. From these regression models, generating motion with the legs (both greater hip and knee work), minimizing the horizontal distance of the body to the load, maintaining a stable body position, and minimizing lift time were associated with lower magnitudes of low back moments. These data support that using cues targeting these identified variables may be more effective at reducing peak low back moment exposures via lift training.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641124000117/pdfft?md5=331cb89065147b5e66587b1dbd11a54c&pid=1-s2.0-S1050641124000117-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641124000117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lift technique training programs have been implemented to help reduce injury risk, but the underlying content validity of cues used within these programs is not clear. The objective of this study was to determine whether biomechanical variables, that commonly used lifting cues aim to elicit, are associated with resultant low back extensor moment exposures. A sample of 72 participants were recruited to perform 10 repetitions of a floor-to-waist height barbell lift while whole-body kinematics and ground reaction forces were collected. Kinematic, kinetic, and energetic variables representative of characteristics commonly targeted by lifting cues were calculated as predictor variables, while peak and cumulative low back moments were calculated as dependent measures. Multiple regression revealed that 56.6–59.2% of variance in low back moments was explained by predictor variables. From these regression models, generating motion with the legs (both greater hip and knee work), minimizing the horizontal distance of the body to the load, maintaining a stable body position, and minimizing lift time were associated with lower magnitudes of low back moments. These data support that using cues targeting these identified variables may be more effective at reducing peak low back moment exposures via lift training.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定描述常见 "安全提升 "提示的生物力学变量是否与腰背负荷有关
为了帮助降低受伤风险,人们实施了举重技术培训计划,但这些计划中使用的提示语的基本内容有效性尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定常用举重提示所要引起的生物力学变量是否与由此产生的腰背伸肌力矩暴露有关。研究人员招募了 72 名参与者,让他们进行 10 次从地面到腰部高度的杠铃举重,同时收集全身运动学数据和地面反作用力数据。作为预测变量,计算了运动学、动力学和能量变量,这些变量代表了举重提示通常针对的特征;作为因变量,计算了峰值和累积腰背力矩。多元回归显示,56.6%-59.2% 的腰背力矩变异是由预测变量解释的。从这些回归模型来看,用腿部产生运动(加大髋关节和膝关节的工作)、尽量减少身体到负载的水平距离、保持稳定的身体姿势以及尽量缩短移位时间与较低的腰背力矩相关。这些数据表明,通过移位训练,使用针对这些变量的提示可能会更有效地降低峰值腰背力矩暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology is the primary source for outstanding original articles on the study of human movement from muscle contraction via its motor units and sensory system to integrated motion through mechanical and electrical detection techniques. As the official publication of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, the journal is dedicated to publishing the best work in all areas of electromyography and kinesiology, including: control of movement, muscle fatigue, muscle and nerve properties, joint biomechanics and electrical stimulation. Applications in rehabilitation, sports & exercise, motion analysis, ergonomics, alternative & complimentary medicine, measures of human performance and technical articles on electromyographic signal processing are welcome.
期刊最新文献
The effect of tongue-to-palate on deep neck flexor activity Do maximal isometric trunk tasks produce maximum activity in latissimus dorsi? Upper extremity neuromuscular function can distinguish between individuals with and without glenohumeral labral repair Effects of biofeedback and strength training interventions on neck-shoulder sensory-motor responses among visual display unit users. A narrative review High-density EMG reveals atypical spatial activation of the gastrocnemius during walking in adolescents with Cerebral Palsy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1